Wrong IP Address Puts Man In Prison For 50 Days
from the sorry-about-that dept
As many companies would still like to believe that an IP address is all you need to identify a person using a computer, it's worth remembering that not only does an IP address not definitively identify who was using a computer, but it can easily get mixed up. A year ago, we had the story of someone whose house got incorrectly raided (by Shaquille O'Neal, for some unexplained reason) for child porn after an ISP gave investigators the wrong IP address info. It sounds like something similar has happened in India, where a man spent 50 days in prison for posting insulting pictures to Orkut. The only problem was that the guy had nothing to do with it. His ISP handed over the wrong information. This was only discovered once police found and arrested the people who actually uploaded the image. We won't even get into the question of why people are being arrested for uploading insulting photos, but this should serve as a warning to anyone who thinks that relying on an IP address as the sole piece of evidence is reasonable.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ip address
Companies: airtel, google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Interesting
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Big Problem
If something is not done this could become a big problem in protecting our rights.
Not even getting to the legality of such a practice, why wouldn't the authorities investigate further once they thought they had the correct IP address? Relying on this information alone is beyond comprehension.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why is this surprising?
Bureaucracies, large and small, will do what they want and then say they're sorry. Or maybe not. Once it's done, it can't be undone. "Forgiveness is easier to get than permission."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Two words...
It's India. They don't have the luxury of free speech (extending, obviously, into the internet realm, now).
And DF: You claim that data was fabricated. But, fabricated or not, if we hadn't invaded, and they ended up ACTUALLY having WMDs, and we got hit with one such WMD, everyone would be screaming about how the government sucks because we didn't take any action. D a m n e d if you do, d a m n e d if you don't.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ok, should have been one word.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Two words...
That is the most stupid logic I've heard in quite a while. That basically allows your government to go around invading any country they like.
Ever thought how much hatred these actions cause? Maybe one day a country that already has WMD will get so pissed they'll nuke you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Big Problem
What rights? Haven't you heard about the global war on terrorism? There are no rights in a time of war.
Again, because it helps make convictions easier.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Two words...
That's right and that's why the US must invade every country on the face of the earth. Can you imagine the uproar if someday Canada suddenly attacks us with some hidden WMD's that we didn't know they had? We should invade them now, before it's too late. Better safe than sorry, you know.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Two words...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
gotta agree
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nothing to see here ...
You did not read any story about how IPs are not good evidence. You have seen nothing. You heard nothing. Do not think for yourself.
we know who you are. all your IPs are belong to us. go away and wait for our extortion letter to arrive in your mailbox.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
um
"50 days to riches , how I earned 10 million dollars with no work."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: interesting by Ajay
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Two words...
Those who scream that we have no right to be there would scream bloody murder had they attacked us with WMDs. It doesn't make the administration's actions right, but it makes you an insufferable moron.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Two words...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Two words...
WTF? The Bush admin didn't use Iraqi WMDs as a justification to invade? Man, you're a real joke.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: interesting by Ajay
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"It's India. They don't have the luxury of free speech (extending, obviously, into the internet realm, now)."
largest democracy, right?
so funny is this comment that I'd love to get inside your mind, how exactly do you seperate India from her other south asian counterparts unless your whole concept of south asia begins from military ruled Pakistan and the communist China. Jesus Christ I'd love to see more guys like this one on here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Internet, like Democracy, Freedom, and Good Will towards Humanity, is *American*. So all foreign Users, and therefore the IP addresses they have the privilege of using, should be controlled at OUR discretion.
WE should decide who can be raided and/or sent to jail for using OUR property. Either *with* or *without* trial or due process.
USA and Jesus forever.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Regardless...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Dumbass.
P.S. I love stupid American "we're the greatest" bluster like this - nothing is stupider or easier to laugh at. If I were you, I'd have a look at who actually invented Democracy (the Greeks), Freedom (erm... actually that's a natural thing that nobody invented) and Good Will towards Humanity (depends on who you ask, but if you're Christian, that would be a Jewish carpenter living in the Middle East).
Americans had nothing to do with any of these.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
We also never said we were the greatest.
I believe, perhaps, that this discussion could go on forever.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lock down your PC.
The fact is, if your a man, you have to watch your back. You have to lock down your PC. I have seen "evidence" used against men months after they were kicked out of the house during a divorce.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The police rely on it because they WANT that arrest, they WANT to get that "predator" off the street "for the good of the children". That is paramount. In the India case it was those "insulting" pictures, in Florida it was child porn. They ignore any possibility that they should verify the information and consider if it's actually valid as it is.
Other's (like *cough* RIAA, MPAA *cough*) don't really care whether the person is actually guiltly of what ever infraction-du-jour may have been committed. They want the results of "proving guilty" anyone. Stopping the offense is not the real goal it's the publicity of "got another one" that's the goal.
In both cases the potential consequences to the people who are actually innocent are ignored or minimized. In most cases the innocent party is told "oh, sorry. Well, have a nice day". Until there are REAL consequences to the people who are actually doing this there will continue to be stories like this, with the victims just shoved out the door to make way for the next time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I'm pretty positive that patriott was being sarcastic, so there's likely no reason to get in an uproar. I know the internet doesn't allow sarcasm to translate too well, but I think patriott's words were pretty obvious.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Oh, wait, gotta wipe these tears away ...
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahah ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahaha
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
No more, no more ...
Been a long time since I had such a good laugh.
Priceless .....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Two words...
* A womans' right to choose
* (how u 'hate' GWB)
* gay marriage
* (how u 'hate' GWB)
* legalizing marijuana
* (how u 'hate' GWB)
* The WTO
and...and...
Oh also, how this relates to IP addresses????
Logic? Ha, what me worry? No way..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ok
go the Aussies, greatest country in the word,
by the way the French are a joke ( have they ever defended there country successfully?), America is a joke for having such a huge poverty to rich gap and turning a blind eye, the Greeks democracy was flawed and unjust and susceptible to corruption and religion and humans are imperfect just like me! so we all make mistakes and we are pretty much powerless.
chow chumps
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Two words...
[ link to this | view in thread ]