Advertising: The Revolution Won't Be Through Friend Requests
from the skip-this-step dept
Yesterday Facebook announced its long-awaited advertising program. This was inevitable: if you're going to justify a valuation just shy of Iceland's GDP, you've got to eventually propose a means of generating revenue. Facebook will no doubt earn quite a bit of money at the ad game. But the initiatives disclosed yesterday are likely to be a mixed bag — and not at all as innovative as founder Mark Zuckerberg would have you to believe.The most straightforward of the new offerings is Facebook's contextual advertising system. Drawing on the vast amounts of data provided by its users and supplying metrics and query capabilities will no doubt prove to be lucrative. Much has been made of Facebook's particularly rich user data — perhaps too much. Although that data is likely to be better structured and therefore easier to leverage, it's not obvious that Facebook will be able to target ads to its users more precisely than, say, Google does within Gmail. Still, it's hard to imagine these ads being anything less than a huge financial success.
The same can't be said for Facebook Pages, which will provide brands with profiles on Facebook. Facebook has already tried this approach with Wal-Mart, and the results were disastrous. Not only did the nominally back-to-school-oriented page fill up with complaints about the retailer's business practices, but — perhaps more tellingly — many users attacked Wal-Mart and Facebook for bringing corporate shilling to their beloved social network. MySpace's brand profiles have met with a similarly lackluster response: An Inconvenient Truth's MySpace page was something of a marketing coup, but once the novelty wore off the practice failed to produce anything of significance. Although other companies will attract less ire than Wal-Mart, it's hard to imagine users being any more keen to engage with them (except, perhaps, for already-elite brands like Apple or Nike).
The final and most interesting prong of Facebook's strategy is Beacon, a system that will allow partner sites to post users' actions back to Facebook. Having your Amazon purchases or Netflix selections displayed in your mini-feed are the sorts of applications that are being hyped. As you might imagine, Beacon carries privacy concerns, as well as worries that the move will result in a further dilution of Facebook's already annoyingly low signal:noise ratio.
But to my mind the biggest unknown is whether the new data will be considered meaningful by consumers. There's no question that endorsement of a product by a peer is the most effective form of advertising available. Beacon is built with the hope that there are many marginal cases in which users would be willing to recommend the products they're consuming, but can't be bothered to take deliberate action to do so. But does purchasing a product necessarily mean a user wants to endorse it? Or do consumers prefer to curate their public purchases, picking and choosing the brands that they want to use to define their online identity?
It's not clear what the answer is, but I think there's reason to be skeptical of any initiative that attempts to automate individual peer recommendation. After all, genuine human enthusiasm is the sole reason why such recommendations are so effective.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertising, brands, endorsements, privacy, social networks
Companies: facebook
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I don't think ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't think ...
It'd be foolish to think that Facebook isn't considering these issues and taking steps to assuage concerns about privacy. But just because there'll doubtless be some sort of control given to the user doesn't mean that there aren't privacy implications -- witness the furor over the introduction of the mini-feed, which exposed no non-public information but dramatically changed the way user information is provided, detected and consumed by other users.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hate the idea
Beacon's plan sounds like the ultimate in exploiting consumers privacy. It doesn't even sound legal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Same info as Gmail?
For the last few days I've been seeing a lot of wedding related advertising and well as some jobs in my local area.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Same info as Gmail?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Same info as Gmail?
How would google know the difference between my life partner or my business partner? How does it tell my wife from my friend's wife?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
facebook
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fazed book
The danger of giving Facebook too much power, is that FB becomes a single point of misuse, at least this time arrested early (with egg in Mark's freckled face)...
,ominous of the original Web implosion, you can't declare a value too many rungs above reality -- i think it will be an iminent struggle for Facebook and the other Web2lings to find the real $ to support its presumed $.
what is context ? - it must be the user's intended
well.. google pretty much brings you to the merchant that has paid them the most and optimized to frivolous keywords.
- this is far from 'semantic' closeness
Facebook is going to be a massive web pollution in the making - if not thought through properly.
to me the damage has already been done
[ link to this | view in chronology ]