Microsoft Wants A Patent For Saying 'Goodbye'
from the bye-now dept
theodp writes "Demonstrating its commitment to high-quality U.S. patents, Microsoft has submitted a just-published patent application to the USPTO for Automatic Goodbye Messages. By automatically sending messages like 'Have a great afternoon!', 'Sorry, I have got to go!', 'Have a terrific day!', 'Ciao, Harry!', or even a simple 'Bye!' at the end of an IM session, Microsoft explains, one avoids insulting a converser with whom a conversation is ended. Hopefully the USPTO will give this one the quick buh-bye it deserves."Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: patents
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Been done
Prior art, pointless application.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
buh-bye
Problem is, I'm not joking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the sad thing is...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now to patent the next obvious idea...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Now to patent the next obvious idea...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Now to patent the next obvious idea...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Now to patent the next obvious idea...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Microsoft Deserves an Orwell Award for Newspeak
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Insult
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Insult
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How companies come up with some of these patents
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hello!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hello!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The inevitable evolution of this technology...
[22:11] foo: blah blah blah blah
[22:11] bar: hey, I'm trying to get some work done here
[22:12] foo: yeah, i know but blah blah blah blah
[22:12] foo: i mean seriously, blah blah blah blah
[22:12] bar: IM IN YR IM SESSION TERMINATING YR CONVERSATION
[22:12] bar: KTHXBYE
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thomas Edison Never Got a Microsoft Goodbye
If anything, they could be allowed simply to prevent big corporate targets from massive, frivolous, infringement liability.
Creatively-stoned college students just don't have the legal resources to file and defend their originality. Or the time--where does it go? Microsoft's crazy baldheads are getting chased out of town anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
IRC already had, but.....
Because of that, I would not be surprised if this is approved. It would be another example of the shining stupidity of government bureaucracy......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patent reform
Or, better yet, go back to requiring all applications to include a working model. No more theoretical crap. Prove your idea works.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why they do this...
It's important for all of these companies to continually file new patents so that none of the companies get too far ahead of the other ones, and thus would have a leg up in a legal battle. Think of it like the cold war. And I'm serious -- this is why all these companies file for seemingly stupid patents all the time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why they do this...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they made a patent for sarcasm ....
but then again sarcasm online doesnt work out as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: If they made a patent for sarcasm ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wrong Career
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wrong Career
Nah, because as horrible as they may be, even the new ones knew which words to use get that far...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SYNOPSIS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
funny
What's next on their agenda?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Common Sense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Umm... can anyone say "AOL"???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Proposed Solution
[ link to this | view in chronology ]