Vonage Settles AT&T Patent Suit; Anyone Else Want To Squeeze Free Money Out Of Vonage?
from the just-find-a-voip-patent-and-sue dept
The various patent lawsuits against Vonage have been a perfect example of almost everything that's wrong with the patent system. Vonage was the clear leader in this space -- being the first to successfully get this type of product to a widespread audience, even as the idea had been talked for years. Vonage's success had nothing to do with its technology acumen. The concepts behind VoIP services were widely known and widely discussed. The problem facing the space had always been an inability by any company to package it up in a way that people would buy it. Vonage figured that out. And for it, it got sued into oblivion by all the companies who were unable or unwilling to figure out. Just the fact that there were so many patents covering the basic concepts of "VoIP" (even when there was so much prior art) should have been a warning sign that perhaps most of those patents were bogus. However, once Vonage's investors started pressuring Vonage to just settle the cases, things only got worse. Vonage settled with Verizon and Sprint and even with some small patent holder very few people had heard of. With Vonage quickly trying to settle any such lawsuit, you can bet that plenty of companies went hunting through their patent portfolios, looking to see if they had anything related to VoIP which they could use to sue Vonage over. AT&T quickly found something and sued Vonage, knowing the company would quickly cough up some money. And, cough it up, it did. Vonage has agreed to pay AT&T $39 million. Anyone else have a VoIP patent? Might as well sue while Vonage's wallet is wide open...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: patent thicket, patents, voip
Companies: at&t, sprint, verizon, vonage
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
AT&T vs Vonage
They were too afraid of VOip because it requires REAL Customer Service instead of lies and lip service. And it allows "portability that AT&T will Never Tolerate!
Go Vonage! At least it happened now while AT&T is too busy ripping off it's new celular customers to figure out what VOip is really worth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: AT&T vs Vonage
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
First is First
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: First is First
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: First is First
lawyers are the new terrorists. none of this should be happening in a free country.
It still blows my mind that the patent system put in place to give the small inventor a fighting change against large established competitors is the same one being used for exactly the opposite today. Deep pockets abuse the system to prevent any small startups from having a chance. But it is all because the patent system allows it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Junk patents
See:
"the fact that there were so many patents covering the basic concepts of "VoIP" (even when there was so much prior art) should have been a warning sign that perhaps most of those patents were bogus"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Meaningless, like chasing the wind...
Who had the guts to go to market with it?
Is that worthless?
Read my previous posts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about the "Others"?
Disclaimer- I've been a happy Vonage customer since Aug 2005. As an example, I use the forwarding options to ring all of my US and UK mobiles and desk phones, I answer the one I can get to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What about the "Others"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thank You Vonage.
So, thank you Vonage for doing what no one else could do...forcing cash-hungry telcos to realize that their "the customer doesn't have a choice" business model no longer works and to make them actually have to compete. The underdog always reshapes the competitive landscape.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thank You Vonage.
Vonage wasn't trying to rip anyone off, when was the last time you could say that about any of the telcos? When I first got vonage I was paying $14.99 a month, exactly what they advertised. That price didn't rise until after Verizon forced the universal service fund onto them. I even got an E-Mail from Vonage explaining why that was added. The price went up again after Verizon sued.
Verizon only offers their VoIP service to those who have their FiOS. I know nothing about Sprint's or AT&T's, probably similar limitations.
So, taking all this into account, how will this cause anyone to compete?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm just glad I don't have AT&T.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't think their "wallet" is the only thing wide open.
They might want to see a specialist about that anal leakage.
But I agree with the above comment that Vonage has survived just about every financial / patent hit and still has funding. If they (and their investors) are willing to make that kind of 'up front' payment, they must see a huge potential for payoff by staying in the market. Perhaps they could spin it as 'buying a piece of the infrastructure'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sue vonage
I returned their equipment,told them I couldn't use the service.
I was charged over $477.00. Had to cancel my credit card.
I never used their service one day!
I've spoken to 20 "Supervisors". None of whom speak English.
They are even charging me for the equipment I returned!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Make Money
Take five minutes to read this and it WILL change your life.
I just read an article in an internet newsgroup describing how to make
$50,000.00 in only one month from a $5.00 investment.
Of course I thought this was ridiculous, or some type of pyramid. I
talked it over with my family, an attorney, and my friends, and they
all agreed it was some sort of scam. I hate scams because usually
someone gets burned, and I didn't want it to be me! I blew it off for
a few weeks then saw another one in a newsgroup I go a lot and
thought, " maybe this is legitimate", besides whats $5.00 , I spend
more than that in the morning on my way to work on coffee and cigs for
the day!
Well, two weeks later, I began receiving money in the mail!, I
couldn't believe it!
Not just a little, I mean big bucks!!. At first only a few hundred
dollars, then a week later a couple of thousand, then BOOM., By the
end of the fourth week, I had received nearly $47,000.00. It came from
all over the world. And every bit of it perfectly legal and on the up
and up. I've been able to pay off all my bills and still had enough
left over for a nice vacation for me and my family.
Not only does it work for me, it works for other folks as well. Marcus
Valppu says he made $57,883 in four weeks, Dave Manning claims he made
$53,664 in the same amount of time. Dan Shepstone says it was only
$17,000.00 for him. Do I know these
Folks?. No, but when I read how they say they did it, it made sense to
me. Enough sense that I'm taking a similar chance with $5 of my own
money. Not a big chance, I admit-but one with incredible potential,
because $5 is all anyone ever invests in this system. Period. That's
all Markus, Dave or Dan invested, yet their $5 netted them tens of
thousands of dollars each, in a safe, legal and completely legitimate
way. Here's how it works in 3 easy steps:
STEP 1.
Invest your $5 by writing your name and address on five separate
pieces of paper along with the words, " PLEASE ADD ME TO YOUR MAILING
LIST".
(In this way, you're not just sending a dollar to someone; you're
paying for a legitimate service). Fold a $1 dollar bill, money order,
or bank note inside each paper, and mail them by standard U.S. Mail to
the following five addressees:
1) Marco Monet
409 NE 107 St
Miami Fl 33161
2) Alain Renaud
2638 Augustin Cantin
Montreal QC Canada
H3K 1E1
3) J.R. Arnold
14777 Wunderlich Dr. 2212
Houston, Texas 77069
4) Leila Khalil
309 E Rand Rd 302
Arlington Heights IL 60004
5) Robert del Rosario
3313 Ashby Field Avenue
North Las Vegas, Nevada 89031
Step 2.
Now remove the top name from the list, and move the other names up.
This way , #5 becomes #4 and so on. Put your name in as the fifth one
on the list.
Step 3.
Post the article to at least 200 newsgroups. There are at least 17000
newsgroups at any given moment in time. Try posting to as many
newsgroups as you can. Remember the more groups you post to, the more
people will see your article and send you cash!
Step 4.
You are now in business for yourself, and should start seeing returns
within 7 to 14 days!!. Remember, the internet is new and huge!. There
is no way you can loose.
Now here is how and why this system works:
Out of every block of 200 posts I made, I got back 5 responces.
Yes, that's right. Only 5. You make $5.00 in cash, not checks or money
orders, but real cash with your name at #5.
Each additional person who sent you $1.00 now also makes 200
additional postings with your name at #4, 1000 postings. On average
then, 50 people will send you $1.00 with your name at #4, ... $50.00 in
your pocket!!
Now these 50 new people will make 200 postings with your name at #3 or
10,000 postings. Average return, 500 people = $500., they make 200
postings with your name at #2 = 100,00 postings = 5000 returns at
$1.00 each that's
$5,000.00 in cash!!
Finally, 5,000 people make 200 postings each with your name at #1 and
you get a return of $50,000 before your name drops off the list. And
that's only
If everyone down the line makes only 200 postings each! Your total
income for this one cycle is $55,000.00
>From time to time when you see your name is no longer on the list, you
take the latest posting you can find and start all over again.
So that's it. Pretty simple sounding stuff, huh? But believe me it
works!
There are millions of people surfing the net everyday, all day, all
over the world. And 100,000 new people get on the net every day. You
know it, you've seen the stories in the papers. So, my friend, read
and follow the simple instructions and play fair. That's the key, and
that's all there is to it.
Print this out right now so you can refer back to this article easily.
Try to keep an eye on all the postings you made to make sure everyone
is playing fairly. You know where your name should be.
Note: Keep in mind that this has been circulating for over a year, so do not be surprised if some of the addresses are outdated…It won’t matter, because you KNOW your address is correct and since you are starting the process again, all the addresses added by the others will be fresh !!
REMEMBER.... HONESTY IS THE BEST POLICY. YOU DON'T NEED TO CHEAT THE BASIC IDEA TO MAKE MONEY!
GOOD LUCK TO ALL, AND PLEASE PLAY FAIR AND YOU WILL WIN
AND MAKE SOME REAL INSTANT FREE CASH!!
Remember "What Goes Around, Comes Around"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
vonage sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
vonage sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
vonage sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
vonage sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
vonage sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
vonage sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]