Yahoo, Google Sued For Trademark Infringement For Blogs And Mail Groups
from the would-you-like-to-rethink-this-lawsuit? dept
There really ought to be a term for suing a big company that has absolutely nothing to do with the dispute at hand, just because they have a lot of money. Whenever I hear about such cases they remind me of an old Bloom County comic, where the lawyer character, Steve Dallas, tries to figure out who to sue after the actor Sean Penn beats him up for snapping his photo. In the end, he decides to sue Nikon, the camera maker, for not putting a warning on the cameras... and because it's a big company with lots of money. These "Steve Dallas" cases seem to be hitting Google all too frequently these days. The latest involves the International Information Systems Security Certifications Consortium ("ISC2"), who offers "Certified Information Systems Security Professional," or "CISSP" designations for security professionals. The organization is suing a guy who was, at one time, CISSP certified, but lost it. Rather than just lie about still being certified, the guy started describing himself as a Chief Information Security Systems Practitioner, which just so happens to spell out CISSP. That seems like a pretty clear trademark problem. However, the organization is then also suing both Google and Yahoo, claiming that both are guilty of trademark infringement because Google had some blogs with CISSP in the name and Yahoo had some YahooGroups with CISSP in the name. Unless those groups or blogs are representing themselves as being officially connected to ISC2 or the CISSP program, it's hard to see what the problem is. In fact, it seems clear that a few of the groups are to criticize CISSP, which should be perfectly legal (suggesting that ISC2 is simply trying to silence critics). As Eric Goldman notes in the link above, it's hard to believe that ISC2 stands much of a chance in these lawsuits, but why let that stop you? In the world of Steve Dallas, you always sue the big companies.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"It's worth a try"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WOW!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: WOW!
Signed,
Coca-Cola, Inc. Legal Dept.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: WOW!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: WOW!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: WOW!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dig deeper...
I'm not saying I agree with that tactic or that I think they have a snowball's chance- but I am saying a little investigation into the circumstances and the screwed up nature of trademark law makes it easy to understand how things like this happen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Embarrassed...
Makes you wonder how other cert exams can give you instant scores?
I may let mine expire. The more I hear, the more I don't like this group.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh, frak
Upside is: I have no money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Idiot
Sue-happy
Shyster
Pricks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As an attorney . . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Solution
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'mute
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Acronym
[ link to this | view in chronology ]