New Report Claims Violent Video Games A Huge Public Safety Threat... But Fails To Actually Provide Evidence
from the not-this-again dept
Some psychologists are getting a bunch of press today for putting out a report claiming that violent video games and TV are the greatest threat to public safety, short of cigarettes. Of course, we've been seeing claims about the threats of violent video games for years, but every time you dig into the research, you find that what the research actually found isn't at all what's being claimed. Most of the research claiming that violent video games leads to more violence has been dismantled as it usually shows that while people are playing a violent video game, they're likely to be more aggressive and emotional -- but that makes sense. You are aggressive and emotional because you're tied up in the game and you're channeling that aggression and emotion towards the game. What none of the studies seem to show is that this aggression and emotion then carry over into violent acts after the game is done. Some studies suggest people become desensitized to seeing more violence -- but again, that doesn't mean they go out and commit violent acts. In fact, as we've noted repeatedly, as violent video games have become increasingly popular, we've actually seen violent acts dropping. That, alone, isn't enough to say there's no impact, but it certainly raises questions about anyone claiming that violent video games are a threat to society.So is this new research that has finally found a link? Unfortunately, not at all. This is simply a psychologist who has published some of the dismantled research above claiming that he's "reviewed" all of the research on the topic (apparently, much of which is his own research) and declared that the sum of all that research means violent video media are the number two threat to public safety. That's pretty hard to take seriously. Basically, he's cherry picking research, much of which has already been shown not to say what he thinks it says, and then jumping to a conclusion that doesn't appear to be supported by the research. But, of course, it generates plenty of headlines.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: research, rowell huesmann, violent video games
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Exactly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Exactly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Forgot the name but
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Forgot the name but
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Right on
Idiotic psychologist's reports are a major threat to public safety and common sense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LAN Events
If the threat was as severe as suggested, then these events should be almost as dangerous as a modern warzone is for an unarmed civilian.
I fear this is not the case.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dungeons and Dragons
I imagine some of this research is well-intentioned, but most is politicians and researchers taking the safe route and protecting their interests.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dungeons and Dragons
PS: hey Dorpus, long time no see
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Depends on the game.
http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=105&oid=032&a id=0000251534
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As old as time
Given the fact that despite all the great minds that have pondered these issues, no ones every been able to fully explain the effects, and I doubt ever will.
The thing that is important to remember is that games should never be considered in a vacume, and that violent imagery on TV or in Movies will always have an equal (if not greater) effect on society.
Also, no end of government legislation or guidance is ever really going to be a replacement for good parenting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cherry Picking is fun isn't it, Mike?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Violent video games
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Violent video games
Yes, reading a book would be better ....... opps wait a minute those have violence also. Better just hide in a cave from it all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Violent video games
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Violent video games
I think the sarcasm was missed, no ?
In addition, I'd like to point out that there is a significant amount of violence in literature which is described in great detail. And how would I know this if I had not ever read a book? I must be making it up. Your logic is flawed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Violent video games
If you ever read King Lear, you will find depiction of violence that makes people sick and sometimes even faint. And that's from Mr. Shakespeare.
People that lament about "good ol' days" apparently know very little history, which is ironic considering that they base their theories on the past. Corporal punishment has been part of society for a long time, most often public. Yes, why don't we go back to the days of public hangings, beheadings, quartering, torture and all that other pleasant stuff. And after we electrocute our convicted, lets hang their bodies on the bridges, just like they used to do it in all Anglo-Saxon countries. That will remind those damn kids not to play the violent games!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Violent video games
Second, pornography is usually consensual--I won't say always--and so long as that is made clear to the viewers it shouldn't be an issue. I dont't see where porn and video game violence are the same principle.
Third. I'm quite sure pedophiles have always existed. However, as our technology and science has increased, so has our ability to monitor their actions and bring them to justice. So, there may be proportionally the same number of pedophiles, and we simply have a better grasp of how many there are. And I'm sure pedophiles existed before porn as well, so it is hard for you to prove that porn led to pedophiles.
Freedoms of speech refers to our right to say what we want so long as it is not insulting (ie, libel) without consequence. This was intended especially in regards to government, since colonizers were not able to voice their negative opinions about the Crown without it being considered treason. Freedoms of speech does not generally refer to people's right to "publish" material.
Yes, people are a product of their environment, but you don't know that those 8 and 9 year olds you say are out killing and raping played those games. You don't know that they saw porn or violent movies. And even if they did, you would have to try and prove that those games or films influenced their actions, which, from your argument, you haven't. If they did view those things, they are probably the exception to the rule.
All in all, you have a very unsound argument. If you're worried about what your children/relatives/friends or whomever view, I suggest you look at the ratings available on many products and employ parental controls.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Threats to public safety
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Threats to public safety
And how many people has government saved?... You know what, your comment is just so off-topic and retarded I don't even know how to respond. I would expect that from a 16-year-old pothead who is pondering the reasoning behind government based on what he learned in his high school government class, which may be the case. But, you most likely are not that kid; and that's just sad.
Sorry for the flame, but I cringed so badly when I read that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Violence
It's also a safe outlet for realizing fantasies. The game doesn't judge you. It doesn't castigate you on the basis of what your fantasy is. People need this as well. It's nice to have a time where you can do something without your "peers" making judgements on every action you do or do not take.
You don't hear any of this in the reports the psychologists make and there are many more "good" aspects to games. This said, how can anybody seriously think that games are a threat to our society?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Couldn't agree more - and that can be PROVEN mathematically/statistically.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And even the end's a load of crap - prescription drugs kill more people each year than cigarettes, lol
look it up~
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Both Sides
On the other side, the argument is that violence is training our children to be more immune to violence, therefore breeding them to experience even greater and more horrific violence.
I believe that parents should shield their kids from violence. That doesn't mean backing down and buying them the latest GTA because the brat is whining for it. Grow a back bone parents. One the other hand, video game/television/movie makers need to back off on the grotesque violence (like Manhunt 2, there is really no need for a video game like that). Both side needs to admit fault and some responsibility so we can all move on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
IF? Of course there is, it's called High School, dur.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Violent Video Games
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
" A good Injun is a Dead Injun" ...
I think we actually play the same games now as we did 50 years ago but now there is a computer with more visual graphics and goals to kill more faster more efficiently. Also, unfortunately, there is just as much bigotry now as back then, just that now we hate muslims instead.
What seems to be happening is that parents who are in a "me" and "rushing all the time world" are not taking the the time to teach their kids any moral values. Just take what you can when you can, everybody for themselves, and screw the other guy. What should we expect of kids who are taught that by role model. That's what breeds 21st century violence ... not the video games.
Regarding the shots at religion, well, I'm not very much into it myself, but, in the past it did teach people some moral values, at least the "soft" religions as were in North America. It still seems that is evident today ... how many violent Mormons, Amish, or Hutterites are there.
Interesting though that when US people call religion a public safety threat, there is an implication that these are the "hard" religions like Shiite Muslims on a jihad would be viewed. They seem to forget that a lot of people in the world consider US corporate greed as a bigger evil than the Al Q'aida on a jihad. Just differing views on what is "right".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Summary
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: Summary
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
impact of violent media exposure
The damage done by alcohol abuse and the associated DWI, criminal, and generalized misbehavior is so high that anything being discussed here is not even a rounding error.
The attempt to supress drug usage, one of the demons of the right, has been a clear failure with enormous collateral damage. An attempt by the left to supress / regulate violent media is all but certain to be less successful than the anti-drug campaign and would also impose enormous collateral damage.
As for me, I don't fit into either camp. I won't let my 7 year old son play the current violent video games or watch current TV or movies, but I have promised him that if, after he is 10, he has shown himself to be responsible and behaved, I will take him to a local rifle range and enroll him in a NRA marksmanship course (I am a NRA life member). If he follows that through properly, we can then move on to some of the more capable weapons I have.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Parents...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Guns are Are Just As Bad As Video Games
My kid's are now in their mid twenties, rarely drink at all (and no binge drinking like so many US kids), nor were they picked on or bullied in school, nor did they bully others, and are generally non violent calm types.
Why no guns??? Well I/they didn't need them, and they would be just an accident waiting to happen. I also preferred that my kids didn't associate with drug users or gun users in their formative years ... I certainly wouldn't consider the NRA to be the most rational group of humans on the planet.
If video games and TV breed violence, then probably guns do as well. Society doesn't need either, but unfortunately they are there so we have to live with them.
Last point, just curious, what kind of weapons will your 7 year old move on to ... a grenade launcher perhaps??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: William Tecumseh Sherman
Every holiday my family gets together, has a meal, catches up, shoots skeet and trap, and then the kids go to bed while the adults play cards and have a few drinks. There is not a single alcoholic in my family. With the exception of one or two, we all know some form of hand to hand combat. And every single one of us knows the proper ways to handle firearms. Most of us can do everything but make our own firearms. That said, not one of us has been jailed because of violence and there have been no accidental shootings. Guns are dangerous if proper care isn't taken while handling them, but so are cars. In fact, most everything is dangerous if proper care isn't taken. It's not the games that are dangerous, it's the parents neglecting the children that is dangerous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Guns are not inherently evil
My 2d daughter is grown, a 2d dan black belt with a Glock and a concealed carry permit. She has worked as a bodyguard at times. She is Mormon and doesn't drink.
As for my younger kids, after they have proven themselves responsible and been adequately trained, we will see about 12 GA shotguns (field loads), a .223 semi-automatic rifle, and a 7 mm long range heavy barrel elk rifle. They have both expressed interest in hunting. As an old fart, I am not too interested in hauling a deer or elk over miles of logging stubble - it is hard enough walking through that stuff collecting mushrooms.
We are seeing a conflict here between a urbanized population and populations that are more comfortable in the field. Among other things, guns are tools. You use them to hunt and you use them to kill pests. Popping targets can be fun as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hm
Video games are a waste of time, but apparently watching Law & Order is a wonderful investment. Riiiiiiight...
Video games can be dangerous if that is all your kid does all day, but if kept in moderation, it won't leak into their real life. JK Rowling said that she has NEVER had a kid come to her saying they want to become a wizard or witch. Fantasy is fantasy. It's fun, but sensible people know it is not reality. If they don't, well, they have other problems to worry about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: #30
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sure, I have stabbed and shot random people and run over children with hijacked cars, but after I put in the cheatcode or restart the level, everyone is back to normal!
People who say games make people violent just need to be informed of the cheatcodes, and where they can find the hidden healthpacks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think it's screwy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I think it's screwy
In our society we seem to consider violence less bad then sex. Our cartoons, games, movies, books... they tend to center around violence, which actually hurts people, rather then sex, which feels good. This is absurd. Further ones that center around sex tend to be considered less moral, and are protested, or are chintzy or glitzy or otherwise poorly made/done/written. It seems to be getting to be that even ROMANCES have some car-chase or gun-fight scene.
I'll say it again: This is absurd. Sex is harmless, and perfectly natural, and yet we have all of these deep taboos against mentioning it. The stores that sell toys designed for sex, oh, sorry 'martial aids', are chintzy and have an aura of taboo compared to stores that, say, sell toy guns.
Compare K-mart to the adult 'book-store' down the block. In my town there are two. One had a gay-man beaten up outside it. One is so chintzy I'm afraid there are cockroaches in it. K-mart is brightly lit, and comfortable.
Now, I know I'm going to get flamed for this, and called a pervert, and all sorts of other things if I post it anywhere but here. Which really proves my point. Sex is so taboo that it is apparently acceptable to respond to sexuality with violence. Oh, and for the record, Rape is an act of violence and sexuality. They work so poorly together, but in our society they're both lumped under 'taboo evil things'.
And people wonder why there is so much violence and hurting in our society?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poor Quacks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kill me now
We've become a country of finks and cowering pussies who are afraid to offend anyone or do anything considered over-the-top lest we raise the ire of some special interest group.
I will give a years salary if this study wasn't backed or in some way connected with a christian family values group or some others of their ilk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
good points
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: good points
Makin the content unavlible for others restricts freedom for no good reason, and is bad.
Everyone, remember: It's your own damned fault if your life in in shambles because you lack self control.
Mind if your life is in shambles because someone, say, hit you drunk driving and crippled you it's something different.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Right To Bear Arms....
but not OK to play a video game where you could own/ use a gun?
Could it be argued that the constitution allows the right to bear arms, but does not discriminate between real and virtual guns?
Lets get the NRA onto them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Asked and answered
Here are a few observations about this whole subject of violence in video games that just fascinates me.
Every company I have observed that has a had a game under fire for its level of violence has protested that content does not affect the viewer while at the same time spending quite a bit on advertising that very same game using the premise that content DOES affect the viewer.
Study after study and statistical analysis after statistical analysis have shown that advertising works, to a varying degree. Fortunes have been made and lost; elections won and lost; careers have been made and broken due to advertising. Yet no one really knows how or why it works and no ad company I know of offers a guarantee that it will produce specific results other than a transfer of money from your account to theirs.
Do a quick search through Techdirt's own archives. Mike and others have repeatedly shown that being repeatedly exposed to content effects people's behavior. From using free as advertising for not free products to the extent people will modify their behavior just to get away from advertising to the much touted Streisand Effect. Yet few are the people that get the fact that the premises are the same.
I think there can be no doubt that being repeatedly exposed to violence in any and all media will definitely effect your behavior. The real question is when and how that effect will be realized. I don't believe anyone will ever be able to answer that for us.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Asked and answered
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The true evils of the world.
People spend hours and hours, what do they REMEMBER from it? When I play video games, or wrestle(jiu-jitsu) I do interesting things which I later remember with those who were there with me, or tell them the story. Myspace has possibly left me with the one memory of when my account got hacked and I went deleting the posts it made on all my friend's myspaces. Not to mention the messages along the line of "wtf was that?". Needless to say it's a short and not-so-satisfying memory.
Now, I am NOT saying it causes people to go killing, but it's far from inducing any significant mental stimulus like Portal. Sure, I PORBABLY won't ever need to understand the odd logic of jumping DOWN into a pit and firing a portal in front of me to go UP, but it was interesting to see how it had changed the way I percieve things(if only digitally).
Even now, I may not be writing a paper, or researching to cure lung cancer. But I AM partaking in a thought provoking discussion. Not to mention that i'm avoiding re-freshing my message box every few minutes, as I have seen somebody repeatedly doing in the next row.
Constant exposure to ANYTHING will effect you. As Benefacio said, the ad industry is proof of this. There's nothing wrong with a little exposure, just so long as it's not enormous, and if it is, it's still ok as long as measures are taken to 're-align' yourself with reality. In the case of children this would mean encouraging them to play with the "Companion Cube" a little more, and little less with Freeman's Combine pals. If they do only play with the Covenant, or Combine, or whatnot, just be sure to remind them that it's not reality, and that those such action in real life has serious consequences. This worked for me as I grew up, and it has worked for everyone I know.
Lastly, though it's used as such a teriffic waste of time, myspace itself is not evil(likewise with anything else), neither is any other waste of time. But it can get to be too much, and some people obviously can't restrict themselves. If you're reading this and are logged in, PLEASE just sign out, and go READ A BOOK instead of a Bulletin.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Violent video games
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
violent video games
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Beleve that Violent video games mess up kids min
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Beleve that Violent video games mess up kids min
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
violent vidogames shouldnt be banned
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I use violent video games to VENT my anger NOT CAUSE IT. And I am SURE most other gamers like me are the same way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]