Wireless Showdowns That Compare Apples And Oranges
from the better-than-what-now? dept
WiMax has been having some troubles lately, but there's still a half decent chance it will eventually be useful. However, with some suggesting that recent WiMax tests show it's better than the competition (via Broadband Reports), it's worth digging into the details a little bit. The actual report (pdf) doesn't seem to compare it to very much "competition." It merely compares it to WiFi -- which is not and was never meant to be a competitor to WiMax. WiFi is a local area solution. WiMax is a wide-area solution. They're very, very different. It would be a shock if anyone ever discovered that in a wide-area wireless offering that WiFi performed better than WiMax, because that would mean WiMax was in serious trouble. Also, this is how WiMax performed under special circumstances, on a small scale, with a special permit from the FCC. Besides, the issue has never been about getting a WiMax access point to work. The real problem that people are having with WiMax is getting it deployed and working on a wide-scale in a cost effective manner that people will use -- none of which this particular test dealt with. So, we have a small-scale deployment that basically works better than a technology that wasn't even meant to compete in the space. It's like comparing a Ford Pinto to a skateboard and announcing that the Pinto is better for driving across the state. That's true, but it hardly means the press should declare the Pinto as the best solution out there.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ball state university, wifi, wimax
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why WiMax?
Sure, right now it's expensive but competition will bring that down and as they improve their networks for a "data world" the speeds will get better as well.
Maybe I'm just missing something, but to me it seems like we already have "WiMax Solutions" from Verizon, Sprint, etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
PC Community Lacks Wireless Knowledge
These analysts and reporters lack knowledge in wireless and they don't realize things like Intel's 30 mile range is dependent on many many conditions or that many wireless techs can do the same.
Thus Intel's hype has gone on unabated until recently but honest technical assessment of the technology has yet to reach most journalists/analysts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WIMAX/Clearwire
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]