Facebook Loses Attempt To Remove Court Documents From The Web
from the the-privacy-game dept
Last week, Facebook got slammed as people realized that its "Beacon" advertising solution was a lot more intrusive in terms of revealing private info than had been previously believed -- leading some partners like Coca-Cola and Overstock to think better of being involved. As you probably know, this resulted in Facebook modifying the offering slightly -- though still refusing to offer a universal opt-out. The big criticism of Facebook here, of course, was that it was not respecting its users' privacy.That's why it was rather ironic that while all of this was going on, Facebook was involved in a legal fight to try to get some documents taken off the web -- claiming that its founder's privacy was being violated. That case involved a Harvard alumni magazine called 02138 that had recently published a somewhat unflattering story about the Facebook founder and posted Mark Zuckerberg's testimony in one of the ridiculous lawsuits against Zuckerberg (from people who claim he "stole" the idea from them, even though the idea was hardly unique in the first place). However, Facebook was claiming that these court documents revealed too much info about Zuckerberg and needed to be taken offline. As Kara Swisher reports, a judge has ruled against Facebook, noting that the documents were a part of the journalistic effort that went into producing the article and provided the necessary transparency for people to dig deeper into the article. Perhaps that will now be the excuse that Facebook uses to explain why Beacon doesn't really intrude on an individual's privacy as well...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: mark zuckerberg, privacy
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Have a good delve and think about Sucker and facebook and im sure you will come to agree.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Laughing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Beacon
However, for us Firefox & Opera users, we have an easy way to permanently remove it. IE7 *might* have a way but I am not sure if the article talks about IE6 or IE7.
http://www.wikihow.com/Block-Facebook-Beacon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To be honest, the main thing that turned me off about Facebook was its insistance on knowing 'real life' information about me. Even seemingly innocent stuff like the fact that it encourages people to use real names rather than pseudonyms. I've seen enough people get in trouble in the past (and I'm talking "full on identity theft with ruined credit" trouble) from giving out stuff even as basic as that to make me... leery about the whole thing.
And that's not even getting into the problems of, say, your boss finding your profile.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]