Ignorant Politicians Are Bad But Arrogant Politicians Are Worse
from the humility dept
Adam Thierer points out a Washington Post op-ed arguing that politicians should be embarrassed about their tech ignorance. Now, obviously it would always be better to have politicians who were more knowledgeable about the technology industry, and Sen. Steven's inability to tell the difference between an "Internet" and an "e-mail" was kind of embarrassing. Certainly, politicians who head committees where tech-related subjects are a major focus have a responsibility to have at least a minimal competence with technical concepts. And there are a few tech-savvy members of Congress, with Rush Holt and Rick Boucher as outstanding examples. We could certainly use more members of Congress with their in-depth understanding of tech issues.However, I don't think it's reasonable to expect every politician to be an expert on tech issues, and actually think we should give some credit to politicians who are willing to admit that they don't know very much about technology. Our elected officials are asked to vote on a truly mind-boggling array of topics, from foreign policy to health care and from agriculture subsidies to copyright law. It's not physically possible for a Congressman, much less a president, to become an expert on every subject about which he's expected to cast a vote. And so it's perfectly reasonable for elected officials to pledge, as Sen. McCain did, that they would seek out deputies who would be experts on the subjects they don't personally know very much about. The alternative is not to find philosopher-kings who are experts about every subject they are responsible for regulating. The alternative is politicians who delude themselves into thinking they're experts and rush headlong into passing ill-conceived bills. That leads to a lot of poorly thought out legislative proposals. A politician who knows his own limitations will at least think twice before proposing legislation on a subject he doesn't understand. And that can only be a good thing.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: politicians, tech literacy
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
keep the politicians happy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"These experts congressmen seek out are sometimes uninformed"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well said
Most people spend their entire lives inside houses, without having the slightest idea in architecture, read labels every day without having a clue in flexography, and drive cars without the slightest clue what is the Gas mixing ratio.
So the politicians are not to blame - the people are, for electing politicians that do not surround themselves with capable and unbiased advisors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well said
They're not being asked to build gentoo and learn css and javascript. It'd be nice if they could differentiate between two things the general public (politicians included) use on a daily basis.
Them not knowing this info is not called "reasonable", it's called "senility".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lobbyists, er I mean experts
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mark Twain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Which I think illustrates your main point pretty well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm not buying this
I expect elected officials to have at least passing familiarity with medicine, physics, literature, law, technology, biology, mathematics, chemistry, history, sociology,statistics, culture, diplomacy, economics, and several dozen other subjects that I could add to the laundry list. These are baseline qualifications that anyone who aspires to a position of leadership/power should meet before proceeding further. Those who can't or won't are clearly undeserving, as they have failed to even minimally educate themselves.
Given the incredible access to knowledge that most of us enjoy, this isn't particularly difficult. Simple steps such as "read at least one quality newspaper every day" and "find tutorial sites on the Internet" and "stop reading vapid tripe like Mitch Albom and read Richard Dawkins instead" are almost always easy and cheap (or even free).
Many of the problems we face (for various values of "we") have their root causes in the incredible ignorance displayed by government officials -- in all governments, at all levels. And we are in large part responsible for that, because we often vote for those who agree with us -- even if they are appallingly stupid and ignorant. We need to learn to value intelligence and knowledge (and where we can find it, that precious commodity wisdom) above slogans and self-interest and partisan politics.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm not buying this
I EXPECT politicians to be charismatic bastards with no clue what they are doing, but who know how to give people a warm feeling. I expect them to be schmoozes who hide their contempt behind false smiles. I expect them to be misanthropic sociopaths out for their own good and power and nothing more. Just pawns that are easy to manipulate by those who know how, but who think they're kings, or at least rooks and knights.
This is, of course, because only misanthropic sociopaths with delusions of grandeur seek that level of power, AND are capable of dealing dirty enough to get it, without getting caught.
Welcome to reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
My point was that it compares the tech ignorance of any given politician to ignorance of mortgage types held by a banking chairman, or ignorance of dirty bombs held by a homeland security specialist. The analogies in the original article are the ones that are stupid.
So I'm not sure what the article is asking, to be honest. Am I making sense now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Because only security specialists know about dirty bombs, where everyone knows that grass is green.
Understand???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
an honest politician is a national calamity
i would much rather have a bunch of greedy dishonest politicians fighting each other for the opportunity to abuse the american people than for a handful crusaders joining together to change things for their cause.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Politicians should all be very embarrassed ....
Obviously it would always be better to have politicians who are more knowledgeable about technology, industry, economy, science, culture, philosophy, art ... with ability to discover/read and understand the difference between a dogmatic position, delusional mythology, or implicit experience (not in the book) and then reason (bias free logic) the best options probable for citizens/humanity.
A general (not genius) intelligence, sanity, competence with collaboration and consensus skills is adequate for excellent decision making across many highly complex concepts/subjects. Best/Excellent decisions, depend on the person and methods they use to make decisions, far more than leadership or charisma. Charismatic leadership is good for bad or good decisions, and persuasion of an inerudite or obtuse nescient public.
However, I don't think it's unreasonable, to expect every politician to be well informed on important issues, and actually thinking prior to emotional reaction. We should give some credit to politicians who are willing to admit that they are dysfunctional due to their staff's unforgivable incompetence at keeping their politician's understanding of significant subjects second to none in the general public.
Democracy, The USA Constitution, Science, Engineering, Law, Technology, Medicine, Learning/edu, Economics, Child Care ... Food ... Housing ... International Cultures, War, Crime ... our free~press/media, clergy, and politicians have a sacred and patriotic responsibility to be well informed and keep US Citizens truthfully informed.
The POTUS and VP to federal and state legislatures, and their staff, have failed US horribly, behaved horrendously, and injured humanity. Democracy is besieged and in jeopardy of being lost for decades/centuries.
Corporatism and Corporate-Welfare (Corporatist Government) is economic plutocracy/communism with all control/wealth vested in the nepotism supporters of the corporate state. Capitalism/Meritocracy is in a critical condition and may not recover from protectionist tactics of the New Economic Fascism for global domination and exploitation.
Politicians (most not all) are clueless of limitations, and legislating limitations on US Citizens ... like opt-out privacy, tax-cut4wealthy paid by increasing taxes on middle class and poor (med-deduction went from 2% to 7% ...), DMCA .... I suspect, congress and the POTUS (over the last 20-30 years) discussed and distracted US with more fear, sports, pedophilia, religion, patriotic ... faux-truths and flagrant fraud than ever in USA history. The USA political propaganda institution has magnificently surpassed all the old Goebbels machine.
Propaganda is always essentially simple and repetitive. In the long run, influencing public opinion is achieved only by false definition of problems in simple terms, and then forever repeating the faux-lies despite contrary and factual overwhelming evidence expressed by others with real knowledge and experience. Was it Bush, Chaney, Clinton (Bill/Hilarious), Limbaugh, Rude Julie, and/or Joe Goebbels that said something like this to US.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They're all lawyers, and there's not really anything wrong with that EXCEPT that it means that they write laws in jargon. Jargon serves as code to keep those who don't speak the jargon ignorant. This is bad.
Also it means that they right laws that benefit lawyers.
So in the end they are always in favor of tying the Gordian knot tighter, because it gives lawyers more to do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Forgot to mention
I don't dislike my father, he knows where 'it's at' but some of his friends are all too much like the people they voted for. My generation will be jaded though by the time the old farts die.
It's the one after ours that will get power again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignorant politicians
We have the proof , as politicians are repeating the errors made decades ago
and they won't admit it . Add to that the incompetence and greed in the financial and business sectors , and we have what we have today , a big unsustainable mess .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]