Being A Total Jerk Online Still Isn't Criminal
from the and-so-it-goes dept
Last week, we wrote about the unfortunate situation of the girl in Missouri who committed suicide after some others who knew her created a fake MySpace profile of a boy who befriended her and then turned on her and told her she was mean and he didn't want to be friends with her. As we noted, there was a push to find or make new laws to punish those who had participated, but in the end, prosecutors are noting that no criminal charges will be filed because no actual laws were broken. Yes, it's a tragic situation, but it is not against the law to be a jerk. Of course, those who participated still have to deal with the consequences of what they did -- including attacks from a virtual posse. In the end, this is the right thing. What happened was awful, but you can't bring criminal charges against people for just being mean, otherwise the courts (and jails) would be even more ridiculously overburdened than they already are.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: harassment
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
WARNING: English language demolition in progress ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We have law to handle this.
Mike, I'm less keen on the virtual posse than you. If there's any redress to be had here, I hope it can be through the courts rather than through vigilante justice.
Although the "tort of outrage" isn't very popular with judges, it still exists in most states, and this case is probably one where it fits.
I happen to believe the tort of outrage should be respected more, used more, and misused less. It's potentially a very powerful tool we can use in order not to have to explicitly proscribe every conceivable form of vile behaviour.
Note that I did a couple of videos about a near-lynch-mob situation that cropped up on YouTube this summer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the people knew that the victim was emotionally distressed, and knew or should have known that their behavior could cause the girl to commit suicide, then they could have been held liable. Here, the Prosecutor did not find that the behavior was geared towards this end, so rightly did not bring charges.
However, there may still be grounds for a civil suit by the parents, which they most likely will win some ridiculous amount.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Suicide
> emotionally distressed, and knew or should
> have known that their behavior could cause
> the girl to commit suicide, then they could
> have been held liable.
Well, the point is, that even though they were being tremendous asshats, the people taunting the girl DIDN'T know any of that. Even the girl's parents didn't know she was suicidal. If they had, they would have made sure she didn't commit suicide, dontcha think?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Suicide
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gee. Anybody want to...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As for the content of the message, I would agree, it is probable that no laws were broken. To some extent, I like the idea of the "virtual posse" although it could have some potentially nasty side effects. For instance, what if somebody claims to have been wronged but is not entirely truthful in their claims and the posse ruins an innocent person's life?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone should do something about this blog
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Someone should do something about this blog
This is wrong in so many ways......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get the word out
Everyone should read what she said. It's amazing the delusions this woman has.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Get the word out
Come on people. Open your eyes. After checking it out, I can say for sure that there was no crime, and that the defendants have nothing to feel guilty about.
Read both sides of the story and always question the overly hyped media before passing judgment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Get the word out
Children bearing children there are no parents in
this story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Her death is sad but it's not the fault of who tau
We need to start having thicker skin and taking some responsibility. The ultimate person who ended this girls life was herself. Okay, that might sound harsh but it's also the way it is. She was young though and therefore she might not be fairly held accountable for her actions completely. A child is supposed to be guided and protected by their parents until they can make decisions on their own. Her parents obviously did not play a proactive part in her life, talk to her, take concern in her online activities or get her the help she apparently needed.
Lets start taking some more responsibility in this world. It's not the fault of someone who is rude or nasty to you or hurts your precious little feelings if you can't deal with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Civil Suit
Commenting on incorrect grammar every time you read a post shows a personality that is something I'll leave for the psychologists to explain.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
She should be charged.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: She should be charged.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Civil
Hit them with a few mil law suit...lives ruined....parents happy.
Move on....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The only real crime I see...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now, the neihbors didn't break any laws. If you read anything that deals with the online conversations not a single sexualy inapropriate thing was said by the Josh persona. In fact, the people operating the Josh persona intentionally lead the conversations away from that sort of thing. So, no law broken.
Also, it is indeed against the law to say certain things about people....unless those things are true. From what I can dig up, they only accused her of things she did. Once again, not illegal.
Finally, people can be sued for "causing" another to commit suicide (stupid law if ever there was one), but there has to be shown cause. The worst that was said were a few vulgarities and the phrase "would be better off without you". Not exactly motivation to kill ones self.
The neihbors did something rude, but if you listen to all of what was going on you find nothing more than people being people. No criminal intent, no sexual assault, no grounds for suicide. The worst that happened were a few obscenities and the Josh persona saying he was better off without her. Hmm, sounds like a normal day in any American city to me. The only person at fault was the girl who killed herself and, if you insist on pointing fingers, her parents. Though I would have to say that thier actions were typical of the american family as well.
In the end, the neihbors have more cause for lawsuit than the "victims" family. They were absolved of culpibility and yet they are still recieving threats via the internet and "outraged" citizens. Nice to know that america can stand up for something, to bad it isn't for what is morally right.
On a seperate, yet related topic, it's about time that "virtual posses" like the one that threatened the neihbors and, most especialy, the "To Catch a Predator" people were prosecuted. What they do is illegal and yet people praise them. Look into the statistics, the numbers, the facts, and you find that they help virtually no one and ruin the lives of a great many. If you want an internet crusade then take them to task. All the things said, incorrectly, about the neihbors CAN be laid at the feet of these people and yet the public hail them as heroes. That's irony for you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Posses
> the one that threatened the neihbors and,
> most especialy, the "To Catch a Predator"
> people were prosecuted. What they do is illegal
What the "Catch a Predator" people (the organization is called Peverted Justice) do is NOT illegal. Hell, they work with the cops and prosecutors on a regular basis. If what they do is a crime, don't you think they'd have been stopped and arrested by now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Barrenwaste
16 I can understand, wasn't too long since I was 16. But... jeez man, it's just... wrong at 14 and under... anyway people who haven't fully matured yet look awkward and shitty. And they have too damn many issues. And it's too easy to hurt them.
Go pedophile catchers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My problems with these things are as follows. Firstly, while driving the girl to suicide was not the intention, that was definitely the cause. If this had been in the physical world and the interactions had taken place at a party, somebody would probably be held accountable, even if it was just people carrying on with the party while the girl killed herself being charged with some kind of negligence.
The other thing that concerns me is that creating a fake persona and doing pretty much anything else immoral online would be prosecuted. If anything remotely sexual had been suggested, or a fake meeting arranged, this couple would go down under pedophile laws. If they had made suggestions to the girl to pirate movies or download a virus or they had posted libellous comments on a company website, they could be prosecuted. But, since "all" they did was drive a girl over the edge of suicide, they get away scott free? That's simply not right.
Surely there's some kind of harrassment or stalking law that can be used? These parents are clearly not good role models for their daughter, and if they were willing to do this simply to understand a falling out between a couple of teenage girls (who often don't have a rational reason for such things), what will they be willing to do with the future boyfriends or employers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get over it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Get over it
Except it was not, it was an adult setting up a child, building her up just so she could knock her down
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If an adult did in meat-space to a child what these adults did from down the street, heads would roll. This isn't an issue of "if I say you stink and smell and I hate your guts and you go home and slit your wrists, am I criminally responsible?". This is an issue of conspiring ADULTS systematically destroying a child.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The fake MySpace sudo boyfriend breakup is the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back.
The sad fact here, as with 99% of all stupid tragedy crap in the news and the courts, is that its easier for us to point the finger at someone else than to take the responsibility. Parents need to start PARENTING.
Blame the gun makers, blame the video games, blame fake boyfriend breakups, whatever. Blame the freaking parents for once! They are the MOST INFLUENTIAL PERSONALITIES IN A CHILDS LIFE!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
She knew
Megan was seeing a therapist about her depression. The adult woman committing her disgusting antics towards Megan knew that Megan was suffering depression and seeing a therapist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Well, the point is, that even though they were being tremendous asshats, the people taunting the girl DIDN'T know any of that. Even the girl's parents didn't know she was suicidal. If they had, they would have made sure she didn't commit suicide, dontcha think?"
Only problem is, except for the suicidal part (no one knew that) they DID know all the rest.
They knew they were dealing with an emotionally disturbed/depressed hormonal 13 year old girl, and as any parent or right thinking adult knows, that is playing with fire
And even they did not, what adult in their right mind does the crap they did to any 13 year old disturbed or not? And even worse see's nothing wrong with it after the fact with it's associated consequences?
This woman deserves everything bad coming her way, the only sad thing is her kid will also suffer the fallout for her stupid acts. My only hope is they send the daughter away to live with relatives, not only to protect her from the lynch mob but also from her own mother, because if the mother is like this I dread to think what kind of warped and screwed up values she is instilling in her children
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They linked it here but I'll link it again: http://meganhaditcoming.blogspot.com/
Go on, it's a long read, but after it I seriously think you'll reconsider your position on the matter and question what it was you actually read in the media.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stigma
behavior is peer pressure.
I hope the people involved in this sad event
spend the rest of their lives with an albatross
around their necks. As a warning for others that
might commit such repulsive acts.
The psychopathic parents involved are beyond
redemption but they could serve as example for
others. It's the only positive outcome I can
imagine.
May they bear the stigma until the end of days
for this cruel, ruthless, despicable act.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Her side?, just pathetic excuses
but...
Her side is absolutely ridiculous, it is one thing when kids are bullying kids, but a grown woman attacking a 13 year old? come on! I agree with an above poster, if this was the father doing it, he would be in jail. This woman needs a figgin job and stop pretnding like she is 13 again. it sounds to me like this woman is equivalent to the mom in Mean Girls. I really hope she is happy, and if she truly feels no guilt about this, then she is hardly human. She should have provided the proper guidance to her daughter to handle such a situation.
And those of you who think an adult grown woman causing this level of mental distress on a 13 year for revenge is OK, then I really hope you never have kids or are around kids, or other human beings for that matter.
Do you hang out at the middle school and ty to steal lunch money? hey you could block the the ladder to a slide just to make some 6 year olds cry too. get a life
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
blog barf
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blog help?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Blog help?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: RE: posses by BTR1701
No, the true predators are the Perverted Justice people. I've done a little looking and they are being sued, by a couple hundred people. GOOD! Now we just hope the lawsuits are succesful and the those people are stopped permanently and required to pay heavy fines and jail sentences.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: RE: RE: posses by BTR1701
I'm speechless, but the ones I support are the ones that let the other make the first move. If they make the first move it's entrapment. If the other does... then there's something wrong with the other.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Apparently, to the PJ haters and pedophiles, universal revulsion isn't something society is entitled to. This Drew woman should be pilloried, virtually at least. Her vile actions had horrible results. Her public behavior may not have criminal repercussions, but the that doesn't preclude civil action or social action.
She performed this behavior in public, a girl died as the result. Now sympathizers think Drew is off the hook? If I lived in her town, I'd make sure she knew she wasn't welcome in my shop. If I lived on her street, there'd be a sign on my lawn explaining just how welcome the myspace murdering mother is at my house.
Tell me, how does that make me a posse or a vigilante?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Barrenwaste by Anonymous Coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Barrenwaste by Anonymous Coward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Was a law broken?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:#45
Answer:
"She had attention deficit disorder and battled depression. Back in third grade she had talked about suicide, Tina [Megan's Mother] says, and ever since had seen a therapist.."
"According to Tina, Megan had gone on vacations with this family [the Drews]. They knew how she struggled with depression, that she took medication."
Reference link:
http://stcharlesjournal.stltoday.com/articles/2007/11/10/news/sj2tn20071110-1111stc_pokin_1.i i1.txt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bray loudly sheep
The parents should have been aware of their child's condition and acted accordingly. Giving her unmonitored access to the internet demonstrates quite clearly that they had very little concern for the well being of their child.
I don't care what the "other" people did and a reasonable person would not have been exposed to a situation like that so this falls into a lowest common denominator scenario that should not exist.
Simply put, if you can be induced into killing yourself by reading words on the internet you should be removed from society for your and our protection
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bray loudly sheep
"I don't care what the "other" people did and a reasonable person would not have been exposed to a situation like that so this falls into a lowest common denominator scenario that should not exist."
Riight. Reasonable people don't normally get exposed to armed robbery, yet we still have innocent people robbed, wounded and killed. But since it's not all that common, we shouldn't do anything about it anyways. That's what the Second Amendment is for, right? Pathetic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Speaking of jerks....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pedophile
Lori is a perfect example of a child sex offender and should immediately lose custody of her daughter and be put in jail for a long time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
being a jerk online and more....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
geez..
Get your brain centers out of your crevices. Stop smelling your farts and if you say ANYTHING about going green, I WILL kill myself(interpretation?) and then my "people" will look up all your ip's and then we will take you all to court for my admitted slaughter on the internet. I'm horrified that you people live here..I now never will wonder how we got here. Thank you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]