PR Firm Says Video Games Should Be Regulated... After Video Game Lobby Picks Different Vendor
from the don't-mess-with-hill-&-knowlton dept
It's a competitive business world out there and sometimes you don't get the clients that you want. But, should you take revenge on companies that opt not to use your services? Apparently that's what PR firm Hill & Knowlton did (though the firm denies it). The Entertainment Software Association (ESA), the lobbying group for the video game industry, went searching for a PR firm recently. H&K had competed for the business, and as a part of that, conducted a survey about video games to aid in its presentation. The ESA chose to go with a different firm... and H&K then released parts of the study that painted the video game industry in a negative light in what certainly looks like retribution. The firm put out a press release announcing "60% of respondents agree that the government should regulate the sale of video games," which is exactly the opposite message the ESA wants out there, of course. The actual study had some other conclusions that fit more with the ESA's message, but H&K chose to highlight the exact message that the ESA has been fighting against. In fact, the whole press release pushes the idea that the industry should be regulated, completely skipping over the other parts of the study.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: pr, studies, video games
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
games should be regulated
although the system for movies doesnt completely stop people from seein movies that were not intended for their age range, it stops them from buying them.
there's no way i think a 10 year old kid should be able to buy a game like GTA.
but other than that, leave the games industry alone...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: games should be regulated
It's not the industry's fault that the people selling games are 17 years old, make a dollar over minimum wage and see no problem selling M games to kids slightly younger than themselves.
The games have warnings on them. Clear, easy to understand warnings. How much clearer could Mature and Adults Only be? Just because the ratings don't come from a group of secretive puritans doesn't mean they're worthless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: games should be regulated
It's not the industry's fault that the people selling games are 17 years old, make a dollar over minimum wage and see no problem selling M games to kids slightly younger than themselves.
I was under the impression that it was mostly up to stores to enforce the sale of the game. So if a store sells an M game to a child, they couldn't be fined for doing so (not like selling a rate R movie to a minor).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: games should be regulated
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: games should be regulated
Movies are not regulated. It's a voluntary system. Games also have a voluntary system, but it's not followed very well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: games should be regulated
A 10 year old is NOT allowed to buy a game like GTA.
People are *so* uninformed!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: games should be regulated
No, they are not.
A 10 year old is NOT allowed to buy a game like GTA.
No. There is a voluntary system, that stores are free to ignore (many of them do). There is no law against selling a 10 year old GTA.
People are *so* uninformed!
In this case, it would appear to be you that is uninformed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just a thought....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re #1 Fuse
So, it already is regulated just as much as movies eh?
The problem is that the clerks don't check ID cards of any sort and sell it anyways.
Unless you go to GameStop (at least the ones around here). All of them card everybody I see go through the line except those that are Obviously parents and about 40+ yrs old.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re #1 Fuse
The ESRB is not a government body. The second the government starts even rating games it becomes a first amendment issue. The ESRB is an organisation crated by game developers for the benefit of the parents. It is the store's choice to sell or not sell M or AO rated games to individuals under 18 years of age. Most stores have a policy that they will not and an employee will be fired if they do. Movies are rated the same way by an organisation that is not controlled by the government.
So your correct but only if the company has a policy not to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Free market!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Free market!
Yeah, the lesson is make sure that Hill & Knowlton has been removed from your (short or otherwise) list of PR firms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That the simplicity of this system seems to go completely ignored is terrifying to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Point?
Games should be free like music. I got it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Point?
Jeesh, where have you been?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
why bother regulate the industry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Value of info from those PR firms
To me, the real message here is that everyone should ignore any "evidence" from any of these PR firms. Now, how do we convince politicians of that ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Value of info from those PR firms
Pay them, of course
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shopping for the "right" results
I don't know anything about this PR firm, but another way to spin this story would be that they did the public a service by exposing a flaw in a system that allows for results shopping.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shopping for the "right" results
Granted that would be intellectually dishonest (although many companies in many different sectors do that), but that's not what happened here: the ESA was looking for a PR firm, and obviously the smart thing to do is contact and listen to several to see which one is (or at least seems) most promising/capable. The ESA didn't ask the PR companies to do a survey, H&K did that on their own, it was their decision as they hoped it would help them land the account. They didn't get the account because the ESA liked another firm better, it had nothing to do with the survey, after all, it's not like just because H&K did the survey, that the survey would have to be used in any campaign or in any way, shape or for, if the ESA had decided to go with H&K
Even without reading the original article and just reading Mike's summary, how is this not clear???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And I think everyone is right, it's the parents deal to watch their kids. Parents are so lazy know adays I think they have issues remembering their children's names. Take for instance the new most popular toy, a bear that reads books to children. and teaches them to read. You don't have to do anything with your kids anymore. Then they get all pissed when something goes wrong.
Regulate parents.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They are regulated
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They are regulated
No, they are not.
You know the little black box in the corner that has either T for Teen or M for Mature or whatever else they use for other age groups the game is regulated for?
Yes, I am quite aware of those boxes. However, that is an voluntary industry agreement, that no needs to obey. It is not a law. It is not a regulation. It's simply a voluntary system that there is no penalty for if not followed.
Sure, no stores or ill informed parents listen to those ratings, much like most dont listen to the R rating in movies when it comes to kids. So what's the big deal?
The "big deal" is that it's a violation of free speech to regulate who can buy the games. Every time a local gov't has passed a law, it's been thrown out as unconstitutional.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Strikes Again!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Um....... no they are not.
Thats why they have ratings on them.
No. The ratings are a voluntary system set up by the industry. They are not a regulation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]