Sprint Takes Away 3 Unnecessary Fees, Replaces Them With 2 New Unnecessary Fees
from the fee-fee-fee-fee dept
Mobile operators have a long history of trying to hide price increases by adding official looking, but totally unnecessary fees to customer bills. The fees usually have quasi-governmental names to them, such as "Federal Programs Cost Recovery," which makes many customers (falsely) believe that these are actually taxes required by the government. Instead, they're simply a way for the operators to squeeze more money out of you while claiming to keep the price low. There's been something of a crackdown on these fees lately, and Sprint has decided to throw in the towel... sorta. It's getting rid of three of the fees, but replacing them with two other fees, just to make things even more confusing. Again, it doesn't appear that either fee is required, but rather they act as a way to hide a price increase while being able to publicly market a lower price.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
San Francisco is an uneccessary fee...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fees
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wait a minute
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Update of Contract?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Update of Contract?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sprint Bad
The lesson - even when a company is uncovered doing an illegal act, they still find a way to keep your money!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ahh...so what are the fees you speak of?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ahh...so what are the fees you speak of?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ahh...so what are the fees you speak of?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ah, the old CTIA explanation. Sorry, don't buy it. In what other business does a company get to tack on its real costs as added "fees." When you buy a pizza, you don't pay "oven fees." You pay the price. Yes, there are fees charged to the telcos, but that's part of the cost of doing business. The complaint here is that Sprint is not at all clear about what those fees are for and implies they are taxes when they are not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You're making me laugh. Nothing the CTIA does is about lowering people's bills. It's the opposite.
One way or another you will pay for it - no such thing as a free lunch...
You might want to try actually reading what I wrote. I didn't say there was a free lunch. I just said that the telcos should be a bit more honest about their prices. They hide price increases in "fees" so they can advertise lower prices.
Then again, I guess following your logic, remove the fee and thus awareness, and bury them in other services.
Again, please READ a little before you make really dumb assumptions. If they want to break out their price, that's fine. But don't advertise the price without fees. Include those fees in the advertised price. Otherwise, it's dishonest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]