Egypt's Plans To 'Copyright' The Pyramids
from the you-have-got-to-be-kidding dept
We've had plenty of posts discussing the ridiculousness of copyright extension, especially when it applies to works retroactively. However, we're usually talking about content created in the last century. Not any more. It seems that this era's obsessions with misunderstanding the purpose of copyright is about to taken to a new level of absurdity. Chris was among many of you who took time out of your holiday feasts to alert us to the fact that Egypt is preparing to "copyright" the pyramids, the sphinx and other Egyptian antiquities. Of course "copyright" is being used loosely here. Realistically, it sounds like some Egyptian politicians need to come up with a plan to raise more tax revenue for the government, and so they came up with this bizarre plan to pretend that they can tax anyone who creates a likeness of famous Egyptian monuments. Apparently this decision came just days after a newspaper editorial suggested that the Luxor Hotel in Las Vegas owes the Egyptian gov't a share of its profits. Realistically, this has nothing to do with copyright at all, but is simply just an excuse to try to try to bring in additional tax revenue by misappropriating the concept of copyright as a weak rationale for the tax. However, in an age where copyright supporters want people to think that copyright is the same thing as real property, it's much easier to get people to believe this is a reasonable proposal. Of course, given that the real purpose of copyright is supposed to be about creating incentives for the creation of new content, does this mean we're going to start seeing new pyramids start springing up in Egypt anytime soon?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
There Rights
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There Rights
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: There Rights
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There Rights
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright Tax
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Many countries have shown that you can get rich without vast natural resources (And Eygpt does have some oil fields, as well the Suez Canal, and the Aswan Dam).
Eygpt is actually ideally located to be a player in any number of markets. It's just a question of advancing to the 21st century, or "the Third Wave" as Toffler calls it.
The problem is a culture of serfdom and fatalism. That can be changed but probably won't. Too bad. Well, at least they have their pyramids. I'm sure Las Vegas would love to share their profits with the Eygptian Government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think it's a good idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I think it's a good idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I think it's a good idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
science project
Wait; an Egyptian Pyramid MP3 player, the little mummy coffin will accept memory sticks. Now the player and the music can both be illegal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: science project
The King James Bible is copyrighted in Britain. I don't see the pyramids as a huge leap.
Daft Punk might have to pay royalties though. They love pyramids.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Germany?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who's their lawyer - The Mummy??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Honor this!
I say: Let them have their copyright!
On another note: Has anyone actually been able to build an exact replica using the same techniques? I saw a Nova thing on it but it was a 2 parter and I only saw part 1.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
what about Camel cigarettes
That will put RJ Reynolds out of business.
The pyramids are a fundamental part of their marketing for the Camel brand.
What is next, the US government charging for every picture of any official monument on Flickr?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They should look at London
Result? All the makers of tourist tat stopped using them. So those places now become over time become less famous and as time goes by, loose tourism revenue while the goverment get little if any extra revenue from the trademarks/copyrights
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
muayad
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Disney Does It
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
no money from the Luxor
"The Luxor hotel in the US city of Las Vegas would also not be affected because it was not an exact copy of a pyramid and its interior was completely different"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]