Microsoft Patents Making A List For Santa
from the but-not-checking-it-twice dept
theodp writes "Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. But making a list for him may now constitute patent infringement. USPTO officials were busy over the holidays wrapping up the paperwork to grant Microsoft its wish for a patent on the Wish List, which was issued to the software giant on New Year's Day." Admittedly, the actual patent goes into a bit more detail than theodp's summary. It involves making a wishlist that goes beyond just a single store, which can include categories rather than just products and which also pulls in additional shopping info. Even with that additional info, it's difficult to see why this is deserving of a patent, as it really just seems to be combining a bunch of things that were easily done before online -- and we had thought that the Patent Office had issued new guidelines, as per the Supreme Court's ruling, to avoid such combinations.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: patents, shopping list, wish list
Companies: microsoft
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
well, that sucks...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
WTF
I've been using this for the last 2000 years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: WTF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: WTF
Anyway, this is actually the most legit patent idea I've heard in a while. Not that it should be patentable, but compared to the other ones...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: WTF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Micro$oft is out of control
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Micro$oft is out of control
u think Apple isn't greedy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Micro$oft is out of control
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Micro$oft is out of control
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Micro$oft is out of control
The security measures taken to patch the defective security model in the earlier versions of Windows are an exercise in frustration for the user. That and the minimum two gigs of ram you need to run it.
But if you want something that will really reduce users to screaming frustration you need to try the new versions of Microsoft Office where key functions are hidden behind what appears simply to be a logo.
That said, after the EOLAS farce, I do not blame Microsoft for patenting every possible little detail. Even if the patent is rejected, the application creates a formal record of prior art at the time of filing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Self-protection
That being said, this patent seems to do the same things as any content aggregation site. Sites like pricegrabber allow you to shop by product or category from multiple sources; and it includes product info., manufacturer data, user reviews, store information, etc. Seems like prior art to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Protection
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And don't forget
Tom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What? It's no more stupid than any other of the roughly 2 million idiotic patents companies have filed for recently.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is terrible
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How is WishList.com not prior art?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]