Isn't P2P Venture Capital Just Going Public?
from the the-SEC-might-have-an-issue-with-that... dept
As there appears to be a growing market for p2p lending services, that has some wondering if there's also a market for p2p venture capital as well. In p2p lending, a group of ordinary folks all team up to lend people money. The various players in the space have had somewhat mixed results so far, but there's a lot of attention. However, for most companies, getting access to capital involves options between taking out a loan (which needs to be paid back plus interest) or selling equity (usually to venture capitalists). In that case, the money comes from someone who takes some percentage of ownership and hopes to cash in not on the interest, but on the growth of the value of his or her shares. So, it might make sense to wonder whether the p2p lending companies might eventually move into p2p venture capital as well... except that we already have p2p venture capital: it's called the public equities markets. If you actually tried to do that with private companies, you'd quickly run into all sorts of trouble with the SEC, which is pretty strict in terms of regulating how a company goes about raising money in exchange for equity. In fact, there are many who believe that a startup may be toeing the SEC's line simply by saying that it's out raising venture money. So, for a variety of reasons, both regulatory and because public equities markets already are p2p venture capital offerings, it's hard to see there being a huge market for companies to get into offering p2p venture capital.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: p2p lending, venture capital
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Execpt for the fact that....
One CEO of a very well known, but smaller, public tech company told me it costs $1 million to $2 million/year just for ongoing compliance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Execpt for the fact that....
But if you're selling shares via a P2P system, you would have to be SarBox compliant as well. You'll be offering shares to the public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Execpt for the fact that....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Execpt for the fact that....
http://www.ici.org/issues/fserv/arc-reg/97_sec_hedge_rules_final.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Execpt for the fact that....
That's true. That's perhaps an exception to what I discuss above -- though, even then you would still need to be careful how the offerings are presented. Plus, it would definitely limit the market pretty drastically. If the idea of P2P finance is "micro" investing among many, many people, limiting the market to accredited investors might not be particularly useful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The only question is whether the SEC will allow informed consent agreements between two willing parties, or if it will use its bully pulpit (as it has before) to dictate the terms of trade.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But what is a P2P VC if not an open exchange for the public?
p2p venture capitalists, I presume, would be doing the same, and thus bypassing the open exchanges as well as the onerous SEC compliance requirements.
You seem to skip over the key part. By opening up the VC process to the public, you are selling shares to the public, which falls under the SEC.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
499
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SEC casts a wide net
The problem is the scam factor- stock and securities scams are the drivers behind these regs. The SEC is protecting unsophisticated investors from rip-offs. Also it is your responsibility, as a company seeking capital, to determine that the people you make an offering to are 'Acredited Investors' ($2mm in liquid assets or $250k annual income for at least 3 years). There's no way you could do this in P2P exchange.
That being said, Sar-Box is an insane burden for smaller companies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
P2P
We think that there is a potentially large emerging market for P2P, but yes, the SEC is definitely going to step in at some point and lay down some rules.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Discussing P2P Finance at BarCampBankSF
We will be discussing P2PVenture, P2PLending, Personal Finance and all the subjects concerning bank & finance 2.0 at BarCampBank SF in Berkeley CET on March 29 2008. Any innovator or disruptor should definitely consider joining.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
List of Venture Capital Firms
Venture Capital Firms for Hi Tech
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=740969
It's worth a look.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]