NBC Universal Explains Why ISPs Should Filter Copyrighted Works
from the because-they're-BIG dept
The NY Times "debate" between law professor Tim Wu and NBC Universal General Counsel Rick Cotton that began Monday now continues. It's actually not much of a "debate" because each are simply answering the questions posed by the moderator, Saul Hansell. However, the latest concerns whether it makes sense to require third party companies, such as ISPs or consumer electronics firms to filter or block content in an effort to protect copyright holders from unauthorized use of their content. Wu's answer focuses on a slightly different question: whether it makes sense for the government to step in and mandate such solutions, and provides a reasonable answer questioning why the government should be protecting one industry's business model at the expense of others'. Cotton's response is quite similar to the one he gave last week at CES. Effectively, it's "there's so much piracy going on, that we need to have others step in and protect our business model."I'm curious if Cotton believes that automobiles should have been forced to go 3 mph with people walking in front of them waving red flags, for the sake of protecting the market for horse-drawn carriage makers? Or, should consumer electronics companies been forced not to allow VCRs to record TV? Both examples involved "big" problems that were seen as "threats" to an existing business model. Yet, rather than being actual threats (after some bogus lobbying/court cases), companies realized that these were actually huge opportunities to expand markets and make even more money. So why is it this time it's suddenly a big threat and not an opportunity? And even if it is a threat, why should it be seen as something that a third party needs to handle? What happens when the required filtering in the US means that foreign consumer electronics makers come up with the next great innovation that isn't possible in the US and we fall behind in terms of the next important innovation? None of that seems to be of concern to Cotton, whose sole focus is on preserving a business model that is certainly not the most efficient nor effective for the industry. I recognize that it is Cotton's job at NBC Universal to make these kinds of statements, but it should be his fiduciary responsibility to the company to suggest that there are better paths to adapting to the changing market place, rather than clinging to an obsolete business model and dragging down other industries with it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, rick cotton, tim wu
Companies: nbc universal
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
filte
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Strangelove
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The only solution ...
I think we would find the world wouldn't end, and, in fact, things would go on without very much disruption, despite whatever dire predictions the copyright apologists would make.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good Greif !
WTF !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh Noes.....
I will be the first that thinks our Internet Providers should give us free access to downloads and crap. Damnit why the hell am I paying so much money for this BS. Im seriously considering breaking my computer very soon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
just to let you all know
If we can't trust this man to know this is unacceptable than how can we trust any pronouncments of his?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: just to let you all know
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Netnutrality
(scratches chin) "I wonder how much they make in legal fees from these record companies. Especially when they decide to sue joe blow for haveing 50+ music files on his computer even though he LEGALY BOUGHT the CD which happens to be a COPY of the orginal created work." I could see someone getting pissed off if someone took something like ohhh the ORIGINAL Bible setting in the vatican and start change passages in that... NOW I can see someone getting REALLY pissed off about that. When I spend 20$+ for a F****** CD that costs .10 cents to make you damn well better believe I'm going to do what ever I damn well please with it...
Ok I'm done ranting...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Netnutrality
Did you ever hear of a SPELL CHECKER? Like the one built in to the comment field on here? Do you think all those nice red lines are just decoration?
Gawd - is this a sample of what keeps file sharing alive? God help us all.
Now get back to the convenience store. It's your shift.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My Copyright
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pull your head out of your ass
The day is near where you'll be able to subscribe to the channels you want to stream their shows. Then we won't be forced into the Comcraptastic channel bundles that are forced down our throats.
Focus on making quality entertainment and improving the user experience. Trying to chip away at our rights and freedoms will drive people away in the end.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: pull your head out of your ass
Yeah, sure. Give me some of what you're smoking. The last seven years have done away with all vestiges of democracy in this country.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why ISPs Should Filter Copyrighted Works
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
remember...
this overall is a very bad idea, and i hope that the Gov stands up to this corp buyout attempt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They don't get it.
Any 'mandated' key escrow system will get buried with escrowed keys.
The best message - don't consume what they produce. At all. Don't watch their products. Try to stop using the parent corporation products. (HA!! Stop using GE stuff?!?!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What wouldn't be filtered?
If you record a thought in anyway, it is your intelectual property. You don't even need to apply for a copyright in the way that you do Patents. The moment you record it, it belongs to you unless you have previously asigned posession to someone else. Regardless, everything on the internet is in some way copyrighted.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stupidity run amuck
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lawyers are not typically corporate strategists, so of course he shouldn't be expected to tell the corporation what strategic direction they should be going.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That may be true, but when he says things tantamount to "technology people are lying when they say it can't be done" and "youtube can do it, why can't everybody else," it's clear that he is straight-up ignorant. He doesn't know and he doesn't care that he doesn't.
I could sit him down to a cup of coffee and say "a computer doesn't know anything, especially the difference between my_home_movie.mpeg and hollywood_blockbuster.mpeg," and his response would be something like "well they should!" And if I told him why they can't, and how youtube works, I bet he'd insist that everybody do what youtube does. Port this to apply to the entire internet, and it says every bit and byte that travels through the internet should be inspected by a human to ensure that it does not infringe one someone's precious right to copy. Now wouldn't that be nice?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ISP business model not threatened
piracy only threatens obsolete business models.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well lets see
[ link to this | view in chronology ]