Is The US Navy Using Patents To Shake Down Companies?
from the something-doesn't-seem-right-here dept
The latest example of how problematic our patent system has become, involves a series of patent infringement lawsuits against a bunch of banks based on a patent that is the property of the US Navy. It turns out that the Navy licensed the patent out to a small company in exchange for 30% of any profits from any patent licensing or litigation. It certainly looks like the Navy is encouraging questionable patent lawsuits. The Navy gets a patent for security authentication, using taxpayer money, and then hands it off to a small company to sue a bunch of banks and generate more revenue for itself. That doesn't seem right. It certainly doesn't help promote the progress of science or the useful arts. The story gets even more ridiculous when you compare it to a story we had a few years ago where an unnamed government agency (possibly the Navy) used a "states secret" claim to avoid having to license a patent. So, basically, the government can use whatever patents it wants without licensing them, but when it comes to its own tax-payer-funded patents, it hands them off to companies to sue others on its behalf. I'm sure that's exactly what Thomas Jefferson pictured when he worked out the details of our original patent system.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Generate revenues?
Who chose the company and on what criteria?
What are the complete terms of agreement between this government agency and this private company?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Schools?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the government can't own a patent, can it?
I've done software development work under DARPA grants before (as probably several readers of this blog). Everything we created that was turned over to the government was in the public domain. (Other games are played where one tries to write the contract to permit the developer to retain rights to software - but that is a third can of worms.)
How can the Navy get a patent???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Make a blog, Techdirt will believe anything
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Military Trolls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How the Navy gets a patent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is flat out bullshit. At the MOST the US Navy should be able to 'go after' the companies not paying the license fee to use the patent (don't like that either, but it's what should be allowed in the current system).
This is like me renting some construction equipment, it getting stolen, and then ME claiming my 40,000 dollar tractor was stolen. It's fraudulent!
Personally, I don't see how the Navy or any other arm of the government can own patents. To me, if something is invented by the US Navy, it should be available for all US Citizens to use without having to pay some asinine fee. The point to the government is to "provide for the good and welfare of the people" and I don't see how this kind of thing is helping me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
by the way to #4 - a patent *is* public domain. public domain just refers to the publishing, but doesn't give the public the right to compete w/ the owner of the patent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's your assertion, but do you have any evidence? And even if it were true, why should a company that was already paid for a product be given back the product it provided? Talk about a sweetheart deal.
it just didn't get the "ownership" of the patent because taxpayer dollars funded the Navy's or DoD's investment.
And it shouldn't. Or the benefits of ownership. Those should go to the taxpayers who paid for it.
I figured some covert military "communications officers" might show up to defend this practice. Are you one?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Heh
Yes, you can sail the seven seas
In the navy
Yes, you can put your mind at ease
In the navy
You can shake down da banker
In the navy
You end up lookin like a wanker
In the navy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hold up with my tax dollars!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't you knees hurt !?!
Government exist only thru the public's sufferance, claims of "saving money" or even more dubious claims of "saving lives" is just pathetic rationalizations for the abuse of the publics trust. I'd hate to see the state of the knees of people who find this scam acceptable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]