Drunk Off Patent Success Against Vonage, Verizon Moves On To Cox
from the who's-next dept
Having successfully sued Vonage over VoIP patents, despite an inferior product and plenty of prior art, it appears that Verizon is seeing who else it can sue for VoIP patent infringement. First on the list is cable provider Cox, who offers VoIP to its customers, just like most cable providers these days. A successful lawsuit against Cox would almost definitely mean additional lawsuits against all the other cable providers, who have also been much more successful than Verizon in actually offering a VoIP service that customers find useful. Of course, in this day and age, it seems that rather than improve the product, the answer is to sue everyone else for patent infringement. Just like the Founding Fathers intended.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cable companies, patents, voip
Companies: cox, verizon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
technonsense
Well, most of the readers of this shitty blog are already imbeciles so it doesn't make much difference at all, does it ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: technonsense
"brainwashing immature techdirt readership"
I think we all know who the immature reader is here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: technonsense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: technonsense
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: technonsense
And, since Im not one to sit idly on the side of a good flamewar, lol @ internet tough-guy getting butt-hurt over childish name calling.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: technonsense
i don't have the link to the study anymore, but it was a pretty interesting read, might try google-ing it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: technonsense
And yet, you're here...funny that.
A.A.M
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
what I don't understand
I mean, it makes good solid sense. Except that you'd be aiding the competition, but on the same note, they'd be aiding you so, do you really lose?
Just my two cents.
And again, IANAL.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: what I don't understand
While we may not agree on everything, if they would join forces, they could kick Verizon's @$$.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]