Super Bowl Intellectual Property Insanity: No Big Screen Super Bowl Parties, Trademarking 19-0
from the the-big,-big-game dept
Well here are a couple stories to leave you with as we head into Super Bowl weekend. Every year it seems there's some insanity concerning the NFL somehow trying to abuse intellectual property rights above and beyond what they're designed for. Remember, the NFL thinks that it can tell reporters how to report on a game, while also forcing them to advertise for NFL sponsors. It also has been known to issue bogus DMCA notices. And, of course, don't forget that not only has the NFL bullied people into believing that you can't use the phrase "The Super Bowl" in an advertisement, after many advertisers switched to the euphemism "The Big Game" to appease the NFL, it tried to trademark "The Big Game" as well.This year, the big news (as submitted by a lot of you), but first by Ryan, is that the New England Patriots have applied for a trademark on "19-0" to represent the undefeated season the team will have if it wins this season. The NY Post, snarky as ever, filed for a trademark on 18-1 in response, supporting the home town NY Giants. This, of course, seems rather ridiculous. What would happen in future seasons if some other team was able to go 19-0? There's also the question of hubris in declaring yourself 19-0 before that final game. On that note, you can already pre-order a book about the 19-0 season, even though it hasn't been completed yet.
That's not all, though. Last year, we had a story that got tremendous attention about the NFL stopping churches from having Super Bowl parties, if they had a TV that was bigger than 55". There was a lot of fuss about it, and you would think that, perhaps, the NFL would let it slide this year. Not so. Ethan Bauley writes in to let us know that, once again, the NFL has been going around stopping churches from holding
So, remember, as you watch the... event... this weekend, to do so on a TV smaller than 55", do not refer to it as "The Super Bowl" or "The Big Game," make sure to notice the photojournalists wearing sponsors' clothing, and certainly do not put a fair use clip on YouTube. And, perhaps, cheer on the Giants in their effort to make the 19-0 trademark question a hypothetical, rather than practical, question.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 19-0, copyright, nfl, super bowl, the big game, the patriots, trademarks
Companies: nfl
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But, regardless, the NFL is getting rather...stupid (to say the least) about this trademark and copyright crap. I would consider a group viewing, regardless of size, the game (or any show) private use, so long as they were/are not charging for it. If it isn't being charged far, I can only see it (from a logical and reasonable view) being stretched to a "promotional event," if it came to that. I'd be happy just to know churches were using the game's drawing power to attract members, but in this money driven world, eyes are set elsewhere.
The commercials are better than the game anyways.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's some kind of game in February?
Seems like a lot of fuss over it. Sounds like they don't want anyone to watch it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: There's some kind of game in February?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the pats are locks
You're probably thinking, What does this have to do with Tech or Dirt or Trademark or whatever? It comes from this: the NFL isn't just trying to control access to their product--earlier this year, for instance, they tried to limit news outlets from using more than 45 seconds worth of footage of any game, including interviews, so that people would have to go to the NFL Network or NFL.com for "total access"--they are also trying to control the storyline. When the Pats are on, as Bloomberg pointed out recently, ratings are up, and that's all that matters. Thus we no longer have a game of skill. We have Survivor, and the NFL are the producers editing the storyline into compelling shape for public consumption.
Not that the NFL's infallible--clearly the refs were trying to set the table for the Pack too to set up the QB matchup the NFL had already been touting, but Favre just wouldn't tuck in--but it's tough for a team to beat both a good team and the refs. I give the Giants zero chance.
Don't believe me? Call me a Patriot hater (I love how the fans of the most racist city in the north have adopted the patois of inner city black basketball fans)? Fine. Just watch the refs. That'll be the real game.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the pats are locks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the pats are locks
The Ravens can't be blamed for calling a timeout? The Ravens lost that game.
You are a Patriot's hater it is clear.
Don't make ignorant comments like Boston is the most racist city in the North. Stop watching ESPN Classic all day and Barry Bonds interviews.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: the pats are locks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dear Conscience
Your Fired.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the pats are locks
Jonathan...Jonathan...Jonathan...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the pats are locks
You're probably thinking, What does this have to do with Tech or Dirt or Trademark or whatever? It comes from this: the NFL isn't just trying to control access to their product--earlier this year, for instance, they tried to limit news outlets from using more than 45 seconds worth of footage of any game, including interviews, so that people would have to go to the NFL Network or NFL.com for "total access"--they are also trying to control the storyline. When the Pats are on, as Bloomberg pointed out recently, ratings are up, and that's all that matters. Thus we no longer have a game of skill. We have Survivor, and the NFL are the producers editing the storyline into compelling shape for public consumption.
Not that the NFL's infallible--clearly the refs were trying to set the table for the Pack too to set up the QB matchup the NFL had already been touting, but Favre just wouldn't tuck in--but it's tough for a team to beat both a good team and the refs. I give the Giants zero chance.
Don't believe me? Call me a Patriot hater (I love how the fans of the most racist city in the north have adopted the patois of inner city black basketball fans)? Fine. Just watch the refs. That'll be the real game."
I could not agree more. First Superbowl I have ever refused to watch.
The only flaw in your post was the use of the word patriots or pats. I am sure you really meant to use their real name the New England Cheaters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Trademarking Numbers
Or are hyphenated numbers a different story?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Trademarking Numbers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How pwoerful is the NFL?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is...
...this Super Plate of which you speak? Is it like some kind of gigantic serving of salad? Eaten by David Beckham, perhaps?
Somebody kept whispering to me about some kind of mutation of rugby involved, but that's ridiculous--surely nobody would play with their food in that way...?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Superbowl?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Superbowl?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is it?
So maybe that is one reason they are banning churches versus Sport bars and the like.
As to the usage of Super Bowl, Big Game and other such nonsense well that is the typical corporate attitude that the US courts have allowed and condone. Contact your elected officials and hound them to change the laws to stop this idiocy. Citizen activism is what will prevent this not whining here,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is it?
Paranoid much? If I had to guess, I'd say that churches are holding Super Bowl parties because they would rather embrace modern trends than be hurt by them [causing low attendance]. "Oh, you say you're not coming to church this week because the Super Bowl's on? Well, what if you could watch it here?"
**AA would do well to learn from churches, the oldest "business" model in the book.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Church bowls?
Oh, and by the way, the screen we have is only 4.5" tops. Of course, there's this bright light behind it and this lens in front of it, but that's just details.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Church bowls?
For the cost of a can or two of food, you get to watch the game with a bunch of people. There's catered food donated by local businesses and a potluck from other attendees. No pressure to worship, no pressure or propaganda, just a relaxed gathering of other fans who don't want to watch the game alone.
Last year the church raised enough money and got enough donations to last through mid-summer.
And the TV screens were all small, but there were a lot of them, as many attendees brought them so you could drift from group to group and socialize.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Big Game in February
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Conversely...
...on the other side we have the Kentucky Derby. Oh, I'm sorry! I mean, "The Kentucky Derby sponsored by Yum! Brands," which is what you're supposed to call it now any time you refer to it. Yes, the race was officially renamed that way. But, hey, at least third parties can actually still call the race by name, even if the name is more than twice as long as it used to be!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
new approach
I mean sure lots of money would be lost while this is happening, but the following years NFL (I hope im allowed placing those 3 letters next to each other) would be begging and perhaps would end up paying for reporters and other party organizers to talk about its games and big events.
I believe in the past when actors or celebrities were complaining too much about the breach of privacy due to over zelous reporters the reporters would snub them which usually ended up by the celebrities having to issue a public apology and so one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: new approach
I think the trademarking of 19-0 is totally stupid and trying to prevent churches and others from showing the game on tv's of any size is even more idiotic. The stadium can only hold a limited amount of people that's why we have TV's and advertisers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not referring to the them
Happily I don't give a crap about them or their thing, so they don't make any money from me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
superwhat
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STUPID BOWL!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Super Bowl...
I have just always had better ways to spend my money, and better things to do with my time than sit in front of an idiot screen and watch pro sports. I know I am in the minority, but if more people refused to pay the prices now charged for pro games, things would change for the better.
Just my opinion. Pro sports are a waste of time, money and electricty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Screw 'Em
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'll do one better..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Super Bowel
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignore it
The NFL has no teeth when it comes to forcing people to watch their show on small screens. And absolutely insane. It is, in essence, boycotting TV manufacturers of large screen TVs. The NFL relies on public good will for everything. If we get pissed off, we can still watch the game. Invite them to sue us. If they dare, show up to court but make sure you invite reporters, and then suggest boycotting anything that advertises on the Super Bowl for a period of one month following the next year's game to remind these imbeciles that we live in a world based on reality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Super Bowl
This is AMERICA not RUSSIA or CHINA -- We WILL NOT BE OPPRESSED by big corp interests ! Stupid asses, and just because I feel like it: Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl, Super Bowl ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stand UP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not a fan here... Hoping for a better society.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As American as...
Gob Bless the rich people!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
F u, the NFL can do whatever it wants, they can't force reporters to cover their games the way they want, they can just not give them free passes anymore. Piss them off? Buy your own tickets you bunch of cheap ass moochers. You want to be all professional? Then write about the game after watching it on TV instead of expecting free tickets and access to all the parties.
Yeah, go ahead with your boycott, that will just prove how no one really cares about you or your stupid opinion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Nothing else is going on so lets waste everyones time and money on a situation which should be no ones business but the NFL.
This is sickening and this ass hat should be called our for this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Brian
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ironic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, if T-mobile can own magenta
http://www.colourlovers.com/blog/2007/11/04/beware-t-mobile-owns-the-color-magenta/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pro sports vs. Amateur sports
Do what I do...watch amateur sports instead. For one, amateur athletes play not to become richer than Namibia, not for a shoe deal, not for a throwaway supermodel girlfriend, but simply for love of the game. You won't have to spend an arm and a leg to watch amateur sports. Amateur athletes aren't some whiny primaddonas that think they're more important than God. I have paid absolutely no attention to professional sports in years, and I haven't missed it one bit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only in America
Greedy
Lawyers
Idiot regulators that allow/encourage
RIAA
etc.
I am sooooo glad I don't live there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Only in America
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Only in America
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What if...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Copyright cheating
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Silly, almost impossible to enforce
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Real Reason
Its all about the money.
Myself, I'll be online playing games, instead of watch the Lamer Bowl.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sunday drive...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@Ignore It
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too many lawyers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So they don't want people to see adds,,,
Makes perfect business sense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
F---k You NFL
Have the laborers of China print up a million throwaway cardboard hats, and partner with these church groups who want to get together as a group to watch your stupid football game, buy a $1 cheap hat for the Superbowl, and half the money goes to feed the starving babies of the Sudan. That way, you arrogant bastards can still track the number of Superbowl viewers for your precious Nielsen ratings.
After the game, the beancounters can ask: how many stupid hats did we sell today? It would work, if you would get your head out of your respective asses long enough to consider doing something positive for humanity instead of being dick heads.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Greedy NFL Asshats
All lawyers should trip over their own feet, while never catching the ambulance.
The biggest asshole in all the countries of this world is my son, who got two Super Bowl tickets for nothing, and didn't ask his dad to go.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Superbowl Intellectual Insanity
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fine(c) Print(c)
...barely(c).
(c) 2008(c) -(c) Forever(c) .(c)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
19-0 trademarked?
Also, does a trademark on "19-0" cover "19 and 0", "19 and zero", "19 wins, no losses", etc?
Although I'm a Giants fan I was kind of hoping they did it just so I could see it. Now I hope they don't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Appease the NFL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thoughts on definition of "public performance"...
Again, the law is somewhat archaic- being written in 1975 when the cost of a 56" television was simply outside of the grasp of the general public.
Now that barriers to entry have come down, I would imagine it would be in the public's best interest to revisit USC 17.110(5)(B)(i)(II).
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/110.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Thoughts on definition of
Again, the law is somewhat archaic- being written in 1975 when the cost of a 56" television was simply outside of the grasp of the general public.
Now that barriers to entry have come down, I would imagine it would be in the public's best interest to revisit USC 17.110(5)(B)(i)(II).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The super what now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The super what now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NFL? screw em......
if enough folks quit watchin' 'em, quit buyin' their cheaply made crap clothin', etc., maybe they'll get a grip on reality.......
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Okay, I will rename it
Stupid Bowl
Shithole Bowl
Come on, join in, it's more fun than watching that game and giving the NFL even more money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Toilet Bowl
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well, there goes that plan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: well, there goes that plan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes but did they?
Here is another two number for you to think about trademarking....17-14
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
18-1
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You all are freaks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Did I miss the Superbowl
Ron & Fex noon - 3pm XM Radio 202
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
close call
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
18-1 Tshirts at Bustedtees
This shirt preserves the memory of the thousands of "Patriots World Champion" t-shirts that were destroyed shortly after Super Bowl 42 ended.
http://www.bustedtees.com/shirt/18-1/male
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
With the ease of copying media and such, everyone's like some big whiny baby on their 'rights'. Which - *real* people haven't really been doing anything different.. I had a lot more music on copied cassette tape than I do MP3.. lol
But the big corporations have a different perception now than they used to with the ease of copying audio and video.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The NFL Wants 1 thing...MONEY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]