You Can't Sue For Trademark Infringement Forty-Five Years Later; Wailers Get To Keep Their Name

NY Times On How Innovation Is A Process

from the this-theme-is-growing dept

Mon, Feb 4th 2008 10:32am — Mike Masnick

For years, we've been among a group of folks pushing for more people to recognize that innovation is an ongoing process, rather than a burst of inspiration, as is often suggested. This may seem like a minor point, but it's actually quite an important one when it comes to things like public policy on encouraging innovation, including such things as patent laws. Patents actually do make some sense if innovation really is a burst of inspiration. But when that burst of inspiration is a lot less important than the ongoing process of trying, adjusting, trying, adjusting -- and when things like patents make it harder for people to try and adjust -- then it's important to understand the distinction. Last month, Business Week ran a nice article on how innovation was a process, and now it appears that the NY Times has its own, similar, article. You could say that the NY Times "stole" the idea from Business Week -- or you could just say that both are realizing something important that's quite fundamental, and are doing their best to innovatively get that message out to the world.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: epiphany, innovation, process

15 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Bill W, 4 Feb 2008 @ 10:59am

Too bad ...
Gee, that's really too bad that the NYT stole that idea from Business Week. That means, of course, that BW can no longer expand, amplify, explore, or further develop the idea. The reason, of course, is that ideas are just like real property and can be owned or even stolen from someone and, therefore, deprive the original possessor of the ability to further use that idea. Maybe they could agree that this is an Open Source idea?

It's especiialy too bad because what if they BOTH could work on the idea? Maybe they would come to different conclusions or, perhaps, disagree and then we might see how two good minds might approach the idea. Why, we might even see if one could use the idea better than the other as they might even try to best each other on handling the idea. Then we'd get benefit from the competition itself!

But, alas, it belongs to the NYT now .... sigh ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Bill W, 4 Feb 2008 @ 11:03am
  
  Re: Too bad ...
  I just had another thought. What if one of them PATENTS the Business Process of "Innovation As An Ongoing Process?"
  
  WOW!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Feb 2008 @ 11:08am

Their lack of inspiration is why the New York Times is circling the drain.

The Times is "processing" themselves into oblivion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
angry dude, 4 Feb 2008 @ 11:14am

F*** you all dudes
A bunch of paid media clowns and worthless PR hacks talking nonsense and doing a lot of harm to the future of this country, instead of focusing public attention on real problems like fixing USPTO and making patent litigation cheaper and more predictable...

Geesh, this country is really really f*****
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
monkeygrudge, 4 Feb 2008 @ 11:18am

a book, even!
The Myths of Innovation by Scott Berkun http://tinyurl.com/2b4r7o
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- angry dude, 4 Feb 2008 @ 11:36am
  
  Re: a book, even!
  "Scott Berkun knows innovation. A member of the Internet Explorer team at Microsoft from 1994-1999..."
  
  yeah, innovation indeed
  
  they just shamlessly ripped off all essential features of then much superior Netscape browser and bundled IE with Windoze to kill the smaller competitor..
  Innovation my ass
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 4 Feb 2008 @ 12:11pm
    
    Re: Re: a book, even!
    Where do you work angry dude? It seems you only make comments here during the work day between a certain amount of time. Must be nice to be paid to make uninformed, flamebait comments for a living.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Sal, 4 Feb 2008 @ 12:44pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: a book, even!
      I'm not sure how much I can trust Angry Dude, but if that quote is true, he has a good point.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - angry dude, 4 Feb 2008 @ 1:49pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: a book, even!
        Sure you can trust me:)
        
        http://www.amazon.com/Myths-Innovation-Scott-Berkun/dp/0596527055
        
        from the book description:
        
        "Scott Berkun knows innovation. A member of the Internet Explorer team at Microsoft from 1994-1999, he is a full-time author at www.scottberkun.com and wrote the 2005 bestseller, The Art of Project Management (O'Reilly). He also teaches creative thinking at the University of Washington"
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Dan, 4 Feb 2008 @ 2:14pm
    
    Re: Re: a book, even!
    "they just shamlessly ripped off all essential features of then much superior Netscape browser and bundled IE"
    
    Netscape was hardly a superior browser during that entire 5 year span. Navigator was superior to IE for the first half of that time span, and fell behind in the second half. Microsoft essentially caught up with IE 4, and beat out Navigator with version 5.
    
    I am a little confused as to what "essential features" you are referring to.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 4 Feb 2008 @ 2:58pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: a book, even!
      Viewing web based content
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Feb 2008 @ 2:02pm

About angry dude
Angry dude used to be in the military, but seems to have been..."discharged"...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
steve, 4 Feb 2008 @ 2:02pm

Re: Microsoft IE and Netscape
It's too bad there wasn't some established legal mechanism by which Netscape (or Mozilla or U.Ill.) could have protected some of their innovations...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brian Hayes, 4 Feb 2008 @ 3:02pm

Property is so confusing
I found it odd when I read "You could say that the NY Times "stole" the idea from Business Week...". I'm certain that I could robe my works in copyright sprinkled with service and trademark claims and never protect an idea. I'm glad too that ideas are never private property.

BTW, as time goes on the posts about IP are truly educational and always witty and well-written. Bravo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Bill W, 4 Feb 2008 @ 3:24pm
  
  Re: Property is so confusing
  Sorry, I forgot the "sarcastic" flag there ... I thought it might be obvious. I, too, find the IP discussions very interesting. Although I don't think I thought much about the subject prior to becoming a TechDirt reader I certainly do take a closer look at what I read today. The strongest issue I have is with concept of ideas as actual Intellectual Property that are to be treated just as Real Property. If you take the concept to the not-so-extreme then you (or at least I) come up with "stolen property" is no longer accessible to the original owner. Of course that's ludicrous when you think of Ideas, Thoughts, Opinions, or any other mental activity. So how can you possibly try to apply the rules and law of the physical world to mental activity? And yet, as I understand it, that stretch is being attempted today in the IP courts.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]