Doom And Gloom: AP Latest To Claim The Internet Is Getting Clogged
from the that-damn-series-of-tubes-again dept
It really felt like we had just gone through this, but here we have a couple of articles from the Associated Press repeating the unsubstantiated claim that growing traffic on the internet is clogging it up. This has been the story that various ISPs have been claiming for a few years, but there's little to no facts to substantiate it. Yes, traffic has been increasing, but when you get beyond the marketing and PR folks, the lawyers and the lobbyists -- there's little evidence to find that the growth in traffic is at risk of clogging anything. Research has shown that the internet remains blissfully unclogged and when you talk to the actual CTOs at ISPs, they seem perfectly happy to admit that there's no bandwidth crunch. So why does the AP repeat the claim as if it's fact, without any citations or evidence?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: clogged, internet, net neutrality, traffic shaping, video
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
We had just gone through this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: We had just gone through this
And exactly where did you get that nonsense from?
And by the way: its not ONE tube, its a NETWORK. The whole IDEA behind a network is the fact that there are hundreds of different routes you can take to reach a certain point in a network, and besides, if you look at the underground/underwater cables that connect the world, not to mention the satellite links, none of them are anywhere NEAR being clogged, or run at full capacity!!
These claims are pure BS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: We had just gone through this
My question is that if the Internet is so f'n clogged why can I get 3MB down from ATI (when comcast isn't slowing my connection)?
I can tell you now that the cable companies can give much, much more from them to the home. It's how on demand HD works. The trick is that they can't give that kind of speed out. They don't need to work on the last mile, they need to work on the first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
slow internet?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
utilities
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: utilities
Greed is good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: utilities
The difference being that Entrepreneurs offer new services, or used a whole new medium (internet) to improve upon an existing system. But greed is simply jacking up prices and putting limitations while not offering any kind of improvement or anything new we weren't getting before!
There is a clear distinction here. Greed is NEVER good.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: utilities
Those entrepreneurs were taking risks on ideas that looked good and would probably make them money, but that's not greed. Greed money worship at the expense of everything else.
Greed is the CEO sitting on a festering monopoly protecting his business through legislation and scare tactics rather than investing in new infrastructure that would improve the customer's experience, but probably wouldn't bring in additional income.
The AP story says that ISPs expect the amount of traffic to be 4 times greater in 2011 than it is in 2007. What they fail to mention is that Japan or South Korea could handle that kind of increase now without breaking a sweat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: utilities
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Propaganda
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Your articles appears very mistaken
Factually, most Europeans and others enjoy a faster (less constipated) flow than US- and say so every time I ask someone from say, England, Ireland, and more.
Remember available bandwidth is NOT about speed (Light travels at a fixed speed, far as I know electricity, radio waves, same) it is about not bogging down when tapped- which most ISPs are notorious for allowing.
When they say "No bottlenecks (ISPs) they mean THEIR connection- not the end users!
Our (end user) bottlenecks are directly where we get our internet from- the ISP (if there are other choices let me know) and invariably, when reporting "slow" downloads, they allege it is "Just how the system is".
May I suggest you return to those same ISPs, pretend to seek customer support, and see what they tell you then in "Pass the buck" -ese.
Mike
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Infrastructure
"Oh no there's drought we are out of water what will we dooo?"
"Oh no there are too many cars and traffic!"
"Oh no internet users are saturating the internet!"
What ever happened to the good old days when a service had to be improved it actually was?
Build desalination facilities and aqueducts (the Romans could 2000 years ago I'm sure we can too).
Improve traffic circulation, improve roads, build more highways!
Keep expanding and upgrading the internet. Run more fibre! Keep progressing!
Apartments Estepona
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"improve traffic circulation, improve roads, build more highways!"
The result of that always is more cars, more fossil fuel consumption, more pollution, more traffic, more roads, more highways, more cars, more fossil fuel consumption, more pollution, more traffic, more roads, more highways, etc. etc.
I hope you don't intend that.
A more practical, longer lasting and less onerous solution is, build more and better public transportation systems. A maglev could cross North America in faster net time, downtown to downtown, than an airplane. Monorails, light rails and subways can be much better ways of getting around most large city.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As for the article, there is a problem with the Internet, but it is not in the backbone. That is fine. The problem is with the final mile. Ignoring the problems in the last mile is just stupid, because the whole system is only as fast as the slowest part.
Actually, even fiber will run into this issue, because typically it plugs into cable at the premise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Most of you babies should just STFU.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Greed -- excessive, obsessive, rapacious desire of wealth -- is never good.
But dictionaries are pretty good, at least, for knowing what words mean.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Clogged ... get some Drano.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bandwidth
Get rid of the illegal adware that keeps trying to connect to home every time you do anything and we have physical bandwidth to spare.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not infinite
"Indeed, one the major problems with Internet regulation is the tendency of the consumer lobby to insist it act like the old telephone network. If the only tool you have is a telecom regulation, every computer looks like a phone. But on the Internet and its access networks, every user competes with every other use for Quality of Service, and that’s why we need traffic shaping and other forms of QoS."
http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/02/11/demand-for-video-reshaping-internet/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not infinite
You seem like a fairly resourceful person and should be able to find out about it if you research "Smithsonian Award".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who benefits from a public perception of internet slowness... I lean toward the RIAA.. and wonder about the real reason for traffic-shaping (and other things related to slowness but not specific to bitorrent) by Comcast and Verizon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
net clog
[ link to this | view in chronology ]