Cloud Computing Comes In For Some Nasty Weather
from the outages-weren't-in-the-forecast... dept
I've definitely been a fan of Amazon's web services offerings. By providing cheap, scalable and robust processing power and storage (and, as of recently, a simple database), Amazon has started to singlehandedly change the economics of doing certain things online. It's become quite common for startups to build their platform entirely on Amazon's systems -- and given the stability of Amazon itself, it always seemed like a good idea, especially following some high profile outages at popular data centers. However, this morning, that "robust" part got called into question as Amazon's S3 service had a major outage, taking down a variety of startups and services (and, apparently, plenty of images on various websites). While some are suggesting this shows the weakness of "cloud computing," it's not necessarily all that different than those earlier outages where you had a data center go down. Given this and the recent Blackberry outage, we're again learning that robustness isn't just nice to have -- for many services it's really a need to have, and we're not quite there yet.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cloud computing, robustness, s3, uptime
Companies: amazon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I am so glad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I am so glad...
Heh. Well, didn't rackspace just have a major outage too?
http://valleywag.com/tech/followup/rackspace-outage-was-third-in-two-days-321909.php
Not sure you can say that one is necessarily better than the other, which I think is kind of the point. We still haven't figured out a way to really guarantee uptime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
outage
there's no such thing in life as 100% up-time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
God is 100% up time so there
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
File under 'get a life'
- Not a matter of IF it will fail, but WHEN. When it does fail, chance are that it will be at the worse time.
- Even planes with two engines crash. So while redundancy sounds great, it doesn't mean that you won't have problems. In fact, sometimes the increased complexity of redundant systems will increase the chance of failure along with the time necessary to fix it (assuming specialized parts are needed).
- I'm probably being a bit naive here, but does this really matter? For instance, when we work with client that has a server, workstation or Internet outage and they can't work for 1/2 day or heaven forbid a full day, after they come to terms of their system being down it allows them to refocus and catch up on stuff that they had been putting off because of being a slave to the PC/info stream. Sometimes outages are really small opportunities to re-focus and take a step back to see the forest. (I know, I should work in the PR departments for Amazon and BlackBerry - LOL!).
Freedom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I disagree. In fact, I go the complete opposite direction. This proves that robustness isn't as important as we thought after all. The businesses that went down this morning will still be here tomorrow. If any aren't, it's probably not the outage that killed them, or at most it was the straw that broke the camel's back. It turns out most businesses can survive the occasional outage. Sure, it cost them some money, but it's not the end of the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the other was from a site called Metue that had some ideas on how it factors in to the microsoft yhoo deal (article is here: http://metue.com/02-14-2008/microsoft-yahoo-merger-cloud-computing-theory/)
Twice in two days , now I'm thinking I need to do some reading and pay a ton more attention to what the cloud stuff is. Time to scan the past articles here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It can work...
We've been doing "cloud computing" via Terminal server desktops for 8 years with our customers rarely having issues. By building and controling the environment, having great redundancy, and providing great service, it works. Doesn't have to be all web apps, that's for sure. And, if you pick the right service, you have someone on the other end of the phone that can help. Gotta love that.
www.IVDesk.com, it does work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]