The Naked Cowboy Has A Trademark And A Lawyer... And He's Not Afraid To Use Either
from the our-wonderful-society dept
Eric writes in to let us know of a rather odd trademark infringement lawsuit going down in New York. It appears that "The Naked Cowboy," a Times Square institution (he's basically a guy who plays a guitar in Times Square in a cowboy hat and underwear) not only has a trademark on the concept, but he's suing the Mars Company for a video billboard it put up in Times Square (of course) showing animated M&Ms prancing around in cowboy hats and underwear in a virtual Times Square. As the article above reports, the guy may actually have a case of trademark infringement under current laws, though $6 million seems a bit excessive no matter how sure the cowboy (real name: Robert Burck) is of his chances. The real question, though, is whether or not this makes any real sense. The purpose of trademark law is to prevent consumer confusion. It's to prevent Bob's Cola from labeling its bottles as Coca Cola and getting people to buy something other than what they think they're buying. Is that the case here? Will M&Ms buyers be confused? I doubt it, even when we apply the famous "moron in a hurry" test. It's certainly difficult to see how the ad takes anything away from Burck himself -- though, I imagine the lawsuit should only serve to draw more attention to him, which is likely the point, whether or not he scores $6 million out of Mars.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: naked cowboy, trademarks
Companies: mars
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Naked cowboy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And in other news ...
Oh, and does he wear "fruit of the loom" ??????
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't know what law that comes under, though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
rightness
He even shows up in Spiderman.
So, that is his shtick, gimmick. Its hard to call it a copy-right, although if they used it without permission, they are on the hook.
The bigger the company the bigger the cash.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Naked Cowboy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Naked Cowboy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Naked Cowboy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He should be sued himself
I don't see how he can claim that Mars infringed his trademark since he wasn't the first person to do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: He should be sued himself
Because that's not how trademark law works. If Burck and some other competitor were both using the Naked Cowboy mark, then the one who used it first gets priority over the other. But one can only get trademark protection for a mark if he uses the mark, and he can only get protection where he uses the mark.
So while Nestle may have come up with the mark first in Australia, Nestle has no protection over the mark if Nestle does not use the mark anymore. And if Nestle does still use the mark, it clearly does not use the mark in the United States. And if Nestle were to try to use the Naked Cowboy mark in the United States, Nestle would be infringing on Burck's use of the mark because Burck has priority over Nestle in the United States.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I was all set to agree with the implied endorsemen
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cowboys are homos he is in times square where the all the citys pros homos and whores are times square is a pig hole
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
people dress like elvis all over the world anyone in public
can be imitated there is no copyright on any looks mars should tell him to go top hell his lawyer is looking to make a name for himself this bum should go out and get a real job
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
yeeeeeeeeHAW
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i have a racist video
[ link to this | view in chronology ]