Motorola: Since We're Not Innovating, We'll Litigate Over Patents
from the suing-RIM dept
We recently noted the challenges facing Motorola, as it's been unable to continue to innovate in a way that customers desire in the handset business. Unfortunately, it looks like Motorola is choosing the all-too-common strategy among those who fail in the marketplace: they start suing for patent infringement. Motorola has now decided that since it hasn't been able to beat RIM's Blackberry in the marketplace, it's simply going to sue the company for patent infringement instead. Of course, as in any good patent nuclear war, RIM has fired back with its own patent infringement countersuit, meaning that both companies will be tied up with lawyers and judges, throwing away money that could have gone towards actually innovating and actually competing in the marketplace.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blackberry, innovation, nuclear war, patents
Companies: motorola, rim
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
But it goes to show just how irrational that they are.
We didn't even get into the immorality of anti-competitive practices.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't mess with...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't mess with...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't mess with...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wow
Yes, I know you're trying to be sarcastic, but I'll let you in on a secret: sarcasm has to have some basis in reality. Otherwise it doesn't actually prove the point you were trying to prove.
This is the second time tonight, Paul, that you've tried and failed to actually prove a point. We've had this discussion before, and it doesn't seem to do much good, but I'll try again. I have no problem if you disagree with me. But, if you disagree with me, I'd appreciate it if you actually posted arguments that explained why you disagreed with me rather than trying to post mocking statements that only display your own ignorance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Radio Hams should watch this carefully
[ link to this | view in chronology ]