Senate Looks To Outlaw Phishing, Even Though It's Already Illegal

Should Internet Censorship Be Considered A Trade Barrier?

from the bad-idea-for-a-good-reason? dept

Wed, Feb 27th 2008 8:55am — Mike Masnick

I'm generally wary of attempts to use international trade agreements to bludgeon through other policies. For example, Hollywood has used that system for ages to force through bad copyright laws on other nations. So, consider me a bit skeptical to hear that the EU is now looking to claim that internet censorship should be considered a trade barrier. I certainly respect the reasoning, that internet censorship is bad, and it's not a good idea to encourage such policies. However, tying it to trade agreements is likely to open a potentially dangerous can of worms, while probably having little to no impact on getting censoring countries to change their policies.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: eu, international trade agreements, internet censorship, trade barriers

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

John Duncan Yoyo, 27 Feb 2008 @ 9:42am

First they fine the pants off Microsoft and now this. What a Union a government with real cojones.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- neil, 27 Feb 2008 @ 9:59am
  
  Re:
  you think the fines for microsoft are fare and just?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2008 @ 10:07am
    
    Re: Re:
    yes. yes i do.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2008 @ 1:38pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Y'know, cause bundling an internet browser is just so damn evil. >.>
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joel Coehoorn, 27 Feb 2008 @ 10:42am

Think of it this way:

A company in Country A puts up a web site selling it's products, and will ship anywhere. Companies in the same industry in Country B now have to compete with this company more directly. They don't like this, and convince Country B to censor the web site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2008 @ 11:28am

Does this mean that France will have to stop cracking down on Nazi propoganda and memorabilia sales on the web?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Drawmack, 27 Feb 2008 @ 1:09pm

Amusing
Tying two unrelated concepts in order to foster the desired outcome is always a bad idea. First of all, if we tie censorship to trade agreements then we also tie censorship to embargoes. For example I live in the U.S., so if this tie is successfully made then I'll not be able to view any site from Cuba.

Additionally, it could prevent a politically just embargo against someone because the trade embargo would create an information embargo.

If trade embargoes, imply information embargoes then we truly are at the mercy of our government's honesty on foreign policy. Does this sound like a good thing to you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2008 @ 6:48pm

Couldn't companies not having to pay health insurance for their employees while the govt. pays be considered a trade barrier?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Xenu Atkinson, 29 Mar 2008 @ 9:42am

good idea, good reason
When China forces Western companies to comply with the Communist Party's arbitrary censorship agenda, those Western companies are forced to put onto the Chinese market hobbled, incomplete products. Whereas China's stock in trade (right now)is generally upper-stream manufactured goods, the United States economy has turned into a heavily services-oriented, information-rich market. The firms that are thriving in our marketplace simply don't do well in China's environment of artificial barriers and rampant cronyism. (See, for example, Yahoo's experience from 1999 to 2005--they eventually had to pass off Yahoo! China to a Chinese firm precisely because they couldn't walk an impossible line.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gayathri, 4 Apr 2008 @ 8:29am

Business marketing system
A team of successful entrepreneurs credited for www.SelectWealthSystem.com
A new home-based-business marketing system that provides the strategic high ground for internet marketing.
Pro Team Marketing uses an automated marketing system that is currently promoting a cutting-edge young company, entering the early growth stage, that targets the largest consumer base in the United States with their financial educational products.
http://www.SelectWealthSystem.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mazie Gentner, 18 Dec 2012 @ 6:53pm

I am working for an online marketing agency Sydney and I should say that it can be a trade barrier for the reason that it is going to limit connection of companies with their customers and other people. People should conduct more studies and research because anything that we do in the internet can affect people worldwide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]