Iridium May Go Public Again
from the buying-stuff-up-for-pennies-on-the-dollar-is-good-business dept
It's really quite fascinating to watch infrastructure bubbles, where investors overspend on infrastructure, only to go bankrupt, and have that infrastructure picked up for pennies on the dollar out of bankruptcy and turned into a useful, profitable asset. We've seen it with all the dark fiber investment in the '90s, and perhaps we're now seeing it with satellite communications as well. Remember Iridium? The huge satellite phone operation spun out of Motorola that was valued at many billions of dollars? It was supposed to replace cellular phones with satellite phones that could work anywhere in the world. Of course, there were a few problems with that plan. First, it was insanely expensive to build out and launch the necessary satellites. Then, the satellite phones themselves were huge, ugly and bulky. Third, it cost a ridiculous amount to actually use the phones. Lastly, and probably most importantly, between the time it took for Motorola to come up with this plan and to actually have something to offer the market, cell towers were spread quite widely around the globe and cellular technology had improved greatly -- basically lessening the need (drastically) for Iridium in the first place.That caused Iridium to go bankrupt, and for a while the entire project was almost abandoned completely with plans in place to destroy the satellites. At the very last minute, though, a group of investors picked up the entire thing for $25 million (yes, the entire system, which had cost the original company $3.4 billion to build). Not only that, but part of the $25 million buyout was a $72 million contract with the US government. The new Iridium was a lot more focused. Rather than going after the entire mobile phone market, it really narrowly focused on occupations where such phones would be necessary. However, even then, we've still been skeptical that the economics could work out. After all, it's still costly to manage those satellites (which have a limited lifespan and need to be replaced) and reports indicated that the new Iridium really had very few customers.
However, the company now claims it's in pretty good shape, with good revenue and EBITDA, and is even talking about trying to go public once again. I'm sure the roadshow pitch will be quite different than the original Iridium. And, considering the name is still synonymous with one of the biggest failures in business, it will be interesting to see how investors react. Still, it's yet another example of companies buying up expensive assets for pennies on the dollar after an investment bubble, and turning those assets into something useful. Sometimes it's good to be a scavenger, apparently.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: ipo, iridium, satellites, second chance
Companies: iridium
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dysprosium
Shouldn't they change the name to "Dysprosium" ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rip Off
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Dysprosium
Shouldn't they change the name to "Dysprosium" ?
Source, please.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Dysprosium
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fun Sightings
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Dysprosium
Sad thing is satellites usually have a 20 year lifespan, but it looks like it's a propietary satellite so MTBF stats aren't to be found. On the dataside, 10Kbps/sec and 1500ms latency may push adoption of microwave links, UMTS, and terrestrial solutions.
Because the internet is not hiding anymore, like those whitty AT&T commercials tell us... Yes I would like tea with that download.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Dysprosium
atomic number from the periodic table
iridium 77
dysprosium 66
[ link to this | view in thread ]