Blackboard Wins Lawsuit Over E-Learning Patent

Another Court Rejects RIAA's 'Making Available' Claim

from the good-news dept

Mon, Feb 25th 2008 8:03pm — Mike Masnick

Yet another court has rejected the RIAA's "making available" theory of copyright infringement. As a central part to most RIAA cases against individuals for file sharing, the record labels have insisted that merely making an unauthorized music file "available" for file sharing is the equivalent of copyright infringement. Others have pointed out that the law is pretty clear that there needs to be actual distribution (i.e., a copy is actually made) before you can show infringement. The RIAA doesn't like that theory because the evidence they have usually only shows that a file is available, not that it was actually shared. The specific case at hand involved the RIAA asking for a default judgment against an individual who did not respond to charges of infringement, but the judge rejected the default judgment, noting that by using the "making available" standard, the complaint was insufficient. The judge, among other things, points to William Patry's book on copyright, where he explains that "without actual distribution of copies.... there is no violation [of] the distribution right" and also to the infamous Perfect 10 ruling concerning copyright infringement of thumbnail images.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: making available, riaa
Companies: riaa

9 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

zcat, 25 Feb 2008 @ 9:15pm

Not a good precident
GPL3 defines 'making available' as equivalent to distribution... do we really want to undermine RMS?

Oh.. never mind :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Javarod, 26 Feb 2008 @ 5:29am

Making it available is the same as copyright infringement? Does that mean if I leave my door unlocked I can be sued for copyright violation? After all, someone could come in and copy my movies or music since I made it available.

:D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2008 @ 5:38am
  
  Re:
  No, javarod, it just means that your analogy is stupid.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Seth, 26 Feb 2008 @ 5:57am
  
  Re:
  Maybe not the best analogy but flaming him doesn't make you sound any more intelligent. So either be productive to the thread or don't post.
  
  His point is valid though, there are many way to make copyrighted material available and for that to be interpreted as infringement is a bit of a stretch.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2008 @ 6:28am
    
    Re: Re:
    I wasn't trying to make myself sound smart. I was just pointing out how terrible his analogy was.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
David, 26 Feb 2008 @ 7:13am

Well, Javarod does make a good case of where do you draw the line on "making available"? Is a simple password enough? or do we need to protect it with high end encryption?

I think leaving the door unlocked is a good analogy...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 26 Feb 2008 @ 8:23am

Is there any valid reason besides copyright violation in putting copyright material in a file sharing program?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dalane, 26 Feb 2008 @ 8:47am

File sharing does not mean "stealing". Say you have a DVD and it gets scratched. Do you now have to go buy a new DVD? No you can download it and burn a new copy. After all you already own a license to have the movie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dave, 26 Feb 2008 @ 9:12am

By the RIAA's rationale, cops should be responsible for car theft since they setup cars that are unlocked (or sometimes running) for thieves to steal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]