Is Twitter The Future Of News?
from the not-quite dept
The Loose Wire blog has a fascinating example of "crowdsourced" journalism in action: When the UK experienced its largest earthquake in decades, the story was covered first not by the BBC or a traditional wire service, but by a twitter-only news service called BreakingNewsOn. And that service, run by a 20-year old Dutch student named Michael van Poppel, got its leads directly from Twitter users in the UK who were surprised by the quake and made Twitter posts about it. I think this highlights some important trends in the future of journalism. First, when news happens, there are almost always some people around to observe it first-hand. So if enough of those people have ways of sharing their observations with the world -- via Twitter, blogs, Flickr, YouTube, or some other mechanism not yet developed -- then news reporting may consist largely of tracking down these various first-hand reports and synthesizing them into a story. It may not be necessary to send out a flesh-and-blood reporter to cover a story if there's already a ton of information about it on the Web. Second, the line between professional and amateur journalism is blurring, and will continue to do so. Someone we would ordinarily consider just a blogger can break news if he happens to be at the scene of a story or he happens to be the first to notice newsworthy happenings being reported elsewhere on the Internet. Finally, this story suggests one answer to the frequent hand-wringing over the decline of newspapers. It's true that some newspapers are being forced to reduce the number of reporters on the payroll. But that lost news-gathering capacity is likely to be outweighed by the vastly increased news-gathering capabilities of the Internet. If mainstream news outlets can get better at tapping these kinds of decentralized news sources, they should be able to report more news with fewer reporters.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Newspapers, definition:
The NEWS was selected and re-worded by the owners of the newspaper to present a specific viewpoint (which may or may not coincide with your viewpoint). The selected NEWS may or may not coincide with your preferences of news stories. The information and news presented was typically biased by todays standards.
Today, newspapers are still printed locally as a hobby (similar to candle making and horseback riding).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe, but probably not.
I think this is driven by the 'long tail' -- Somehow driven by the core concept that people want to read news that's relevant to their life.
Some news stories sourced from Twitter, et al, are sensationalized, but that can be figured out by reading some of the other news or opinion on the site your visiting.
Will Twitter, et al overtake conventional news outlets? Dunno. But but what makes it newsworthy is "news consumers" are finally being able to get different slants on the same topic or story. This in turn allows an individual to synthesize a unique opinion themselves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So what do you think about it? There's a lot of data out there these days!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*Future* reporting??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Typo
"First, when news happens, there are almost some people around to observe it first-hand. "
Should read:
"First, when news happens, there are almost [always] some people around to observe it first-hand."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
breaking news ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not journalism
I felt the earthquake and turned to the BBC for a report. What I got was hysterical "twitter". Nothing about the epicentre, the scale , the potential damage (the scale would forecast this). I did find out that, variously, people were frightened, had never felt anything like it, furniture moved and that there appears to be quite a few people awake at 1:00am.
This was good compared to the Camden Town fire "reporting" which had all of Camden Town ablaze and people dying everywhere. News should be about responsibility and trust, the general public are typically neither.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A List of News Organizations using Twitter
http://red66.com/2008/02/a-list-of-news-organizations-using-twitter/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Twitter for breaking news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
twitter and earthquake
Documentally is based in the UK.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Twitter is the future of marketing too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]