Canadian Folk Band Wants Harry Potter DVDs, CDs, Games Destroyed Due To Similar Name

from the oh-come-on dept

Tue, Mar 4th 2008 6:02am — Mike Masnick

With all the attention the Streisand Effect is getting these days, don't be surprised when we see more people trying to use it on purpose to their own advantage. Witness the story sent in by reader Jon R, where a Canadian folk singing group is suing Warner Bros. Studios, demanding that all Harry Potter DVDs, CDs and video games that mentioned "The Weird Sisters" be destroyed. Why? Because the folk group has a name similar, but not the same as "The Weird Sisters." It seems like such a blatant "lawsuit for the sake of publicity" that we won't even bother to name the actual folk group's name. The band isn't suggesting that the Harry Potter stories are riding on its fame (which would be the normal trademark claim), but is saying that because they're such an unknown act, people will think they ripped the name off from Harry Potter: "Consumers will assume that the smaller and less famous Canadian band is trying to take advantage of the Harry Potter fame." Actually, my guess is that they'll think that a lot more for this bogus lawsuit than for having a different, but similar, name. Warner Bros., for its part, notes that the folk group filed a similar suit before, and was told to pay $140,000, which it has not.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: harry potter, streisand effect, the weird sisters, trademark
Companies: warner brothers studios

31 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Le Blue Dude, 4 Mar 2008 @ 6:16am

Wyrd Sisters
The norns, controllers of fate, and part of mythology are sometimes called the wyrd sisters. Clearly potter and the band drew from the same source. Last I checked, the norns and the Moirae Atropos, Clotho and Lachesis were both combined by pop mythology as the wyrd sisters. (wyrd means fate)

Clearly the Canadian band is a bunch of jackasses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scott, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:02am

Too Wyrd!
Perhaps they should also try to sue author Terry Pratchett for his almost 20-year-old book entitled, "Wyrd Sisters."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2008 @ 10:54am
  
  Re: Too Wyrd!
  ok! :)
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2008 @ 10:56am
    
    Re: Re: Too Wyrd!
    dahm it stop that, crap!, again
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ben Fulton, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:02am

Wyrd Sisters
One also wonders if Terry Pratchett could sue the band out of existence based on his book of that same name, which probably predates the band!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overcast, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:05am

The "Streisand Effect" does not Equal GOOD attention.

There's no way I'd buy their music just because of this. Lil' whiners.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Chronno S. Trigger, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:13am
  
  Re:
  Far too many people believe (erroneously) the adage "Any publicity is good publicity".
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hellsvilla, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:07am

JKR prolly knew this
JKR prolly knew the band existed (she did do her homework in other similiar matters) and thusly used a slightly different name in the books.

So even when you do your due diligence, it can come back to haunt you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- PaulT (profile), 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:08am
  
  Re: JKR prolly knew this
  You're kidding, right? "The Weird Sisters" is such an unthinkably unusual name that Rowling couldn't have thought of it independently?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - John Duncan Yoyo, 5 Mar 2008 @ 12:25am
    
    Re: Re: JKR prolly knew this
    No Rowling borrowed Wyrd Sisters from Pratchett who may have lifted it from Shakespeare. The Bacon estate should sue.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
PaulT (profile), 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:07am

Yep
To those guys above who had the same idea as me, quick and dirty wiki research shows that Pratchett should counter-sue
The band formed in 1991
The book was published in 1988
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scott, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:19am

More like The Scary Sisters!
Checked out their website.
From the photo, looks more like The Scary Sisters. Yikes!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Martin Edic, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:20am

This suit is nothing more than PR linkbait. I'd like to see Techdirt do some pieces on how people are using IP laws to promote themselves...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mat, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:27am

Err... Shakespeare anyone?
It was Shakespeare who popularised the term 'Weird Sisters' in Macbeth - it's the name for the three witches. And even that wasn't original.

So please no more comments about Rowling or Pratchett - you're about 500 years too late...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hellsvilla, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:32am
  
  Re: Err... Shakespeare anyone?
  No kidding? What part made you believe anyone is not taking this into account?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scott, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:35am

Err... Shakespeare anyone?
We all know it was Shakespeare who originated the "weird sisters" but, it was Pratchett who coined the phrase "The Wyrd Sisters." Since the band is called "The Wyrd Sisters," I think Prachett is a little more relevant than Shakespeare.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:41am
  
  Re: Err... Shakespeare anyone?
  More relevant that Shakespeare?!? How dare you sir. Once I get my cod piece back on I shall slap your face with my glove and demand satisfaction. Shakespeare irrelevant... indeed.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2008 @ 5:09pm
  
  Re: Err... Shakespeare anyone?
  Weird was spelled Wyrd back then
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2008 @ 7:55am

Shake, spear, kick in the rear
Shakespeare wrote better prose accidentally whilst wiping his bottom with a dung rag than all the novels of Pratchett and Rowling combined, sir!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- sigh, 4 Mar 2008 @ 9:08am
  
  Re: Shake, spear, kick in the rear
  Good for him. He still wrote about weird sisters, not the Wyrd Sisters.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2008 @ 5:10pm
    
    Re: Re: Shake, spear, kick in the rear
    He wrote wyrd. Read the orriginal, if you can stand the spelling :-p
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
iPhone, 4 Mar 2008 @ 8:20am

suing warner bros
Guess they're not selling out their shows and very few cd's. Gotta pay the rent somehow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
nipseyrussell, 4 Mar 2008 @ 8:52am

how does one write accidently while wiping their bum???
also - cod piece jokes are always funny!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ben Fulton, 4 Mar 2008 @ 9:04am

Shakespeare was foolish enough to let his copyright expire. If only he'd sold it to Disney...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
demonr6, 4 Mar 2008 @ 9:15am

what's left?
No really.. when you think of it all of the unique and imaginative names have been long since taken so where do you draw the line? Someone is bound to come up with a name of a band, movie, book etc that has been used up at some point in time so freaking deal with it. If it is something absolutely blatant like you wanting to name your kid themed playground "Disney World" then for crap sake you should be kicked in the nuts and slapped with a lawsuit but what these retards are bringing up a lawsuit for is absurd. Change your name to the Flaming RoachCocks and be unique. Wait, that name was taken already. Nevermind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Keith, 4 Mar 2008 @ 9:16am

These same fools tried to sue Warner Brothers Entertainment Canada, Warner Brothers Records, Pulp’s Jarvis Cocker and Radiohead’s Phil Selway and Jonny Greenwood over the same issue a few years ago:

http://www.ateaseweb.com/2005/10/01/canadian-folk-group-sues-jonny-phils-wyrd-sisters/

No t sure how that all ended, but I know a judge blocked their attempt to keep the movie out of distribution:

http://www.ateaseweb.com/2005/11/05/judge-dismisses-wyrd-sisters-motion-to-block-hp -film/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2008 @ 10:50am

wtf! is wrong with people now? The band probaly sucks anyway. Beyotch!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2008 @ 10:52am

you whore!!! (funny though)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 4 Mar 2008 @ 10:59am

wtf! is wrong with people now? The band probaly sucks anyway. Beyotch!

can i sue for no apperant reason too!? :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crockbender, 4 Mar 2008 @ 4:57pm

The Wyrd's are weird. I think I shall avoid them, their music, their website, and any further articles about them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chrisropher Tatman, 5 Mar 2008 @ 11:03am

harry potter bin around since 1990
[ link to this | view in chronology ]