Censoring The 'Net Is Hard
from the even-for-authoritarian-governments dept
Over the last few months, I've been doing research on a forthcoming paper for the Cato Institute on the network neutrality debate. In the next few weeks, I'll be doing a series of posts on the major themes of my paper. My goal will be to highlight some interesting stories from the tech world, and then highlight their broader policy implications.
This week, the blogosphere is abuzz with the story that Iran may shut down the Internet on the date of its elections next week. I should note at the outset that I'm a little bit skeptical of this story, which seems to be rather thinly sourced. It's been picked up by a bunch of news outlets, but they all point back to the same International Herald Tribune article. That story cites two unnamed Iranian media outlets, which apparently don't even agree with each other about the reasons for the supposed Internet blackout. And the idea of blocking Internet access on election day just doesn't make a lot of sense. I can imagine why an authoritarian regime would shut down the Internet for a week or two before the election to suppress access to information about the election. But a block on the day of the election -- especially one that's announced a week ahead of time -- doesn't seem like it would do the government any good.
In any event, this certainly wouldn't be the first time Iran has instituted broad restrictions on Internet access in an effort to suppress the free flow of information. In 2006, Iran reportedly required that home Internet connections be reduced to 128 kbps. That doesn't make a lot of sense either; 128k is still plenty of bandwidth to download compressed audio, for example. But the Iranian government turned to a broad restriction on bandwidth after other efforts at content filtering failed. It seems that "as fast as they put up information roadblocks, Iranians have found detours around them." The only way the Iranian government has found to cut off the flow of information it doesn't approve of is to restrict the flow of information, period.
Some advocates of network neutrality seem to think that network neutrality is an issue of free speech. The fear is that AT&T or Verizon will use sophisticated filtering technologies to block content and websites they don't approve of. A conservative telco might block liberal blogs or YouTube videos, say, or maybe Ford would pay telcos to block access to Chevy's website. But if the government of Iran -- an institution with an almost unlimited budget and the ability to throw people in jail -- can't keep information it doesn't like away from its citizens, it's awfully hard to imagine that AT&T or Verizon would be able to do so. Iran has found that the only way to limit access to content it doesn't like is to limit access to the Internet altogether. Obviously that's not going to work for telcos, which are in business to make money. There are certainly some plausible arguments for network neutrality regulations, but fears of telco censorship are pretty low on the list.
Other posts in this series:
- Censoring The 'Net Is Hard
- Ownership Doesn't Always Mean Control
- Changing The Internet's Architecture Isn't So Easy
- Revolving Door Undermines FCC's Watchdog Role
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: censorship, iran, net neutrality
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
True...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Tor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Easier To Sabotage The Net, Leveraging Tech Ignora
The easiest way to limit access to content would be to take advantage of the average user's ignorance (as Comcast has). Instead of blocking the whole Internet, or entirely blocking a particular content type, site, etc. - both of which are very easily noticed - governments could slow access to certain content, or introduce errors and glitches.
I'm not saying that this would be entirely successful, but when you just corrupt the flow, most people don't know why the service quality is so bad, and just give up. They'll blame their browser, their modem, their PC, or the host site. This is why the "uproar" over Comcast's BitTorrent filtering has been limited to a fairly small cadre of geeks.
It's like election rigging: nobody dares say, "Group x is not allowed to vote". That would be obvious to outside eyes, and could cause a revolt. Instead, jerks just intimidate group x, jerrymander, screw with voter lists, and make the travel distance large to the point where it's not worth the costs to go to the polling place. Yet in the case of election-rigging, non-technical people can understand what really happened. In the tech world, few people do.
Current world politics has shown that it's hard for people to fight back when they can't correctly identify the enemy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Easier To Sabotage The Net, Leveraging Tech Ig
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I hope they don't read this
Parhaps DDoS at the next UN perogotive?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Doesn't have to be impossible, just hard
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Doesn't have to be impossible, just hard
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Iran's possible reasoning
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AT&T, MICROSOFT, GM PLACING ADS OVER INTERNET PORN
Check out http://www.planetpop.tv/culturetrends for a good laugh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
blocking is easy
Blocking nets is easy. Try this on your outbound router port and see what comes back from 192.9.121.X
route add 192.9.121.0 /dev/null0
While i like the idea of a free unfettered net, the reality is that goverments can block whatever they want too, as long as they know about it. The net does not supercede geopolitical realities, as some would have it. The net does not see censorship as damage and route around it, The net see's censorship as a black hole.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stanford's Clean Slate Project
A Clean Slate researcher from Stanford recently gave a talk at my university, and the whole thing was basically a thinly veiled attack against Network Neutrality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Censoring
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hard
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The net does not supercede
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Censoring
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Insightful
Happy Blogging!
Maria
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.calculusproblems.org
It can be brought down.
Algebra Problem Help
Used Harley Parts
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It can be brought down.
Algebra Problem Help
Used Harley Parts
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Government Control
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
custom logo designs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
censorship
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
testimonial voiceovers
you that you have people like me who appreciate your work. Definitely a great
post. Hats off to you! The information that you have provided is very helpful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Customize Joomla Template
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Customize Joomla Template
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BMW ICOM BMW ISIS ISID A+B+C Plus BMW ICOM Software ISTA/D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]