Now There's A Concept: Newspapers Should Add Value To The News
from the why-hasn't-anyone-else-thought-that-one-up dept
It's certainly been rather painful watching newspapers struggle to adapt to the internet age. While there's more demand for news today than ever before, many news organizations are still struggling with the fact that their old way of doing business has gone away. Romenesko points us to a useful, if somewhat obvious quote on what newspapers need to do from the chief marketing officer of Northwestern's Kellog School of Management: "The majority of 'news' customers are past 'what happened' -- they want to know 'how it happened.'" What's scary is the idea that news organizations need to be told this. "News" today is a different beast than it was in the past. The basic facts, people can get anywhere. What they're interested in is being able to dig down and learn more. In other words, they want journalists to actually add value. What a concept.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: adding value, newspapers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"The basic facts, people can get anywhere. What they're interested in is being able to dig down and learn more. In other words, they want journalists to actually add value."
Yes !
Tell me something I do not already know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Economist
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Economist
In business, I'd like to pass along that WSJ does a great job of "concepts" and "why" things happened. I recently renewed my print and electronic subscriptions.
Also, Harvard Business Review does an okay job, but as of late they've become a bit soft, like Strategy+business. This comes apparent when doing a side-by-side comparison to content written 4 years ago.
I think this may be because they are often the first to break a story, and are able to get more candid interviews, whereas later-published articles seem to be re-interpretations of the same story..? I dunno, but I am also not a journalist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People don't read the news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: People don't read the news
We read past your headlines because we already know what they're going to say.
Instead more people are getting their news from Drudge, Digg, Fark, or other aggregators because those sites filter out the cookie cutter stories and focus on news that has a little more meat. Otherwise, the headlines are usually enough and the meaty stories get lost among the cookie cutter stories.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: People don't read the news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: People don't read the news
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't Take This The Wrong Way...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too much boring news, too little interesting news.
I spend a lot of time on sites like Digg, Slashdot, and Techdirt. Perhaps I've been focusing on the wrong topic but I find I have more interest in seeing what people have to say about something than the something itself. That is to say... I find peoples highly opinionated/agendized takes on what happened more interesting than what happened.
As some one noted above most of the stories are cookie cutter. After you have read enough of them even the stories about man eating rabbits and murderous office chairs start to become repetitive. However, occasionally I read something that IS useful. Like an update on the ongoing war with the RIAA and MPAA that does more than declare "F*CK THE RIAA." Stories that actually point out some of the ways the RIAA are losing or gaining ground. Or how about a story on how Hillery wants the government to take further control of how parents raise their children (which lost her my vote long before Obama even announced running).
Perhaps the solution isn't adding more superfluous information. Maybe the solution is taking all the superfluous information away. Maybe the problem itself is as simple as supply and demand. Too high a supply of stories (both low and high quality) with too little demand has resulted in a lessening of the value of all stories, interesting or not. The news market is flooded with low quality stories and only a few useful stories can be found. I do believe this scenario, coupled with other factors not present in the "News Industry," was the primary cause of the Video Game Industry Crash of 1983. Perhaps the solution is to cut back on supply, so that demand can catch up with it. They should focus only on bringing news forward that is actually interesting and HASN'T already been reported by another news source or that at the VERY least hasn't been reported from that angle (assuming the new angle is, in and of itself, worthy of a story).
I'm no economist (and I don't play one on tv) but the high prevalence of low quality stories is why I don't even bother with news sites. Nine times in ten the stories seem obvious or just bore me. Then again, Perhaps I'm just so jaded that nothing interests me any more.
/2 cent
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Newspapers still have value
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike's obvious description of the obvious
I'm not sure which is sadder, that newspapers need to be told to provide richer content, or that you feel pointing out the idea that someone else pointed out the idea was worthy of TechDirt.
C’mon man, you’ve done your best to make sure I don’t expect quality from you, but this sets new lows.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wOw ...
are yu fucking serious kidd dont be saying this shit is and unblocking site wen its not what the flying fuck ? god so retarted im in school fucking bored and i cant do ishhh cause this fucking thing do you know how many sites i tryed and then this one comes to work and it dont unblock anysites are you kidding me wow retarted .. anyways you people suck!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]