The Battle Over H-1B Visas Heats Up With Conflicting Reports
from the take-your-pick dept
Last year, the supply of H-1B visas given to skilled foreign workers to work in the US, was exhausted after a single day, leading to many calls for the program to be expanded. As we get closer to this year's eligibility period, the expectation is for a similarly quick exhaustion of visas, so it's no surprise to see people rushing out studies that are both pro- and anti- H-1B extension plans. First, comes the controversy over newly released data pointing out that many of the companies who received the most H-1B visas happen to either be headquartered or have much of their operations based in India. Of course, the whole point of the H1-B is that these workers are in the US, so it's not entirely clear why it matters who the firm is. However, it does suggest that this may involve a situation where these firms are abusing the program and are not, as is required, first looking for qualified Americans to fill the jobs. Yet, just because some firms are abusing the program, it does not mean the program itself is a bad idea.Meanwhile, Slashdot points us to an article claiming that there is no IT worker shortage, as some have claimed. The article is fairly balanced, looking at a few different recent studies that suggest there isn't a shortage -- though, there isn't much of a surplus either. It tries to reconcile the fact that companies are having difficulty hiring workers (which is undeniable) by suggesting that the problem is more with the hiring process than with the labor supply. Of course, that's just one interpretation. Another might be that many of these studies are counting all "IT workers" as equal, meaning that someone with obsolete skills or who is not particularly good, is considered the equivalent of a programming hotshot. The problem many firms are finding these days isn't that it can't find techies, but that the techies they're finding just aren't that good or qualified.
Finally, on the flip side of the coin, a study has come out dismantling the claims that H-1B visas tend to cost Americans jobs. Instead, it found the opposite was true: H-1B visas tend to create more American jobs. This is only counterintuitive if you believe that the labor market is a zero-sum game. However, as we recently noted, it is not. Bringing good workers into the US helps create more jobs here, because successful local companies help grow the economy and require even more workers. This is supported by the study, which found that for each H-1B visa issued by companies, five additional hires were made as well. With smaller companies, it was even more drastic, showing seven new hires. Furthermore, the study dispels the notion that H-1Bs are only used by companies looking to save money. It notes that when companies are facing hard times, they reduce the number of H-1B applications, suggesting that they're not being used to save money. If you've ever gone through all the paperwork (and lawyers fees) needed to hire an H-1B, you'd recognize that it's hardly a cheap or efficient process.
In the end, though, it's not hard to figure out the best path forward. The key is recognizing the simple fact that the labor market is not a zero-sum game. Bringing strong workers into the US, rather than having them compete from overseas, is much more likely to create more new jobs in the US. It shouldn't be difficult to understand this fact, though we always get angry comments from people who have trouble grasping it. It shouldn't be that complex however: if a company is doing well, it will need to hire more people. A company doesn't do well by letting the best available people (the ones who help them do well) work in other countries. This doesn't mean that it's okay for firms to abuse the H-1B process, but we need to separate the abuses (no matter how widespread) from the program itself. The goal should be to get as many smart, qualified workers working in the US, helping to expand our own economy, rather than working against it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: competition, h1-b, immigration, jobs, wages
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The study we really need...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Hey, fuck you, dude
maybe it is you and your shitty "consulting" business who should be punished here
H1Bs is the modern equivalent of slaves in America
Maybe if slavery is abolished and those H1B folks are legally allowed (by getting them green cards in the first place) to say GFY to employers like you then we could have a real labor market for IT workers and companies like yours based on cheap unqualified labor would go out of business
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Compromise
First, we should cap L visas at 20K per year, cap F visas at 2K per year, cap H-1B visas at 1K per year, and H-2B visas at 1K per year, cap E-3 visas at 800 per year, with no exemptions, set-asides, variances, etc.
Make the H-1B visa permanent, so as to end the abuse that currently takes place while the guest-worker is waiting for processing of green card applications.
Then auction them off a few each month to the highest bidding sponsor/ applicant teams, with the minimum bid set so as to cover the costs for proper background investigations to be carried out (as they should be for every visa applicant).
This will bring back some market discipline, help bring national security back to reasonable levels by reasonable means, would no longer encourage body shopping, and would encourage the use of H-1B and these other visas for welcoming the truly best and brightest to America instead of for facilitating off-shoring and driving down compensation in the USA.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe Not A Zero-Sum Game, But Definitely More Lik
From my standpoint, "the study we really need" is one charting the incoming experience level of the H-1B recipients vs. the duration of their stay in the US.
If the chart shows that we're bringing in a ton of experienced folk, or that they're staying here for the long haul, then perhaps Mike's reasoning is correct. If, on the other hand, the H-1B recipients are under-skilled and leave once they acquire the skills, then the US is losing out big-time. It feels like Mike is assuming that the H-1B recipients are "strong workers", and I'd like to see more analysis on that point. And even if they're strong, if they don't stick around for more than a couple of years, the US hasn't gained that much.
Lou Dobbs hit on this topic in _Independents Day_, albeit more focused on university education. His argument was that if we are bringing in tons of international students, giving them an education, and then losing them back to their home countries, that's a net loss for the US. We could have been training people who would be staying and helping the US financial and knowledge economy.
Now, if there were sufficient quid pro quo — lots of American students studying abroad and returning, or lots of American entry-level workers getting up-skilled abroad — then it would be a wash. Anecdotally, it feels like more foreign students and workers are coming here than Americans are going over there, but I may be wrong about that.
And, of course, in a world full of multinational and transnational companies, it's hard to say what country gets the economic impact from any given educational or entry-level work experience.
In short, I don't think it's nearly as simple as how Mike portrays it in his final paragraph. It may be he is right in the end, but there's a whole lotta more work that needs to be done to confirm that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Maybe Not A Zero-Sum Game, But Definitely More
This is a good point -- but I'll make two points in response. First, the purpose of the H-1B system is to bring in skilled workers with advanced degrees in engineering or science. So they should *NOT* be under-skilled. If they are, then that's an abuse of the system.
Second, even granting you the premise, I am not convinced that the scenario is bad for the US. We would still be getting 6 yrs or so of productive work from the visa holder, and that work can certainly help increase the overall economic pie.
Furthermore, there are additional intangibles, even if the person eventually goes back to their home country, they bring with them ties to people back in the US that could lead to future business for the US firms.
I'm not saying they always will, but these are things that would also need to be taken into account.
Lou Dobbs hit on this topic in _Independents Day_, albeit more focused on university education. His argument was that if we are bringing in tons of international students, giving them an education, and then losing them back to their home countries, that's a net loss for the US.
I have trouble taking Lou Dobbs seriously on anything having to do with immigration. He seems to have a blind spot to even the most basic fundamentals of economics.
That said, if these foreign students are paying for their education, then what is the loss? I'm assuming foreign students are not getting financial aid from the US gov't? Right? Furthermore, again, these students are likely to make connections in the US that can be useful for future business relationships.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Maybe Not A Zero-Sum Game, But Definitely
I have one problem with your response. Having people here for 6 years doesn't necessarily mean that they are helping much to increase the overall economic pie (in the long-term). In my experience(not making a generalization about all H-1B holders), most of the people I have worked with/known that have an H-1B save most of their money or send it overseas. Also, most of them are just saving enough money to move back to their country as soon as possible.
While I'm all for immigration (both of my parents family's immigrated to the U.S.), I'm against people coming to this country, making as much money as possible, and then leaving the country as quickly as they can. That doesn't help with long-term sustained economic growth.
I think that to get an H-1B form, you must live in the country for at least 10-15 years following the time you receive it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Maybe Not A Zero-Sum Game, But Definit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Maybe Not A Zero-Sum Game, But Definitely
The phrase "advanced degrees in engineering or science" is meaningless. We have lots of people in the US with "advanced degrees in engineering or science".
If the H-1B program brings in people who can do things we can't do domestically, or have a true shortage of people who can do, then it's a great system. If the H-1B program brings in what amount to straight-up replacements for who we already have, then I think it's a net loss for the US.
After all, one of the articles you link to reported that students aren't enrolling in programs for "advanced degrees in engineering or science" because they don't think the jobs are there...and bringing in people on H-1B's won't help that perception any.
Again, only if they are capable of doing things that we aren't.
Um, OK. That's a mighty slender limb you're climbing out on, though.
University educations are not infinitely-expandable goods. This is particularly true at the top universities -- they only admit so many people. You can't, say, double the size of MIT in a year.
There's that limb again.
I'm not saying your conclusion is wrong, I'm saying it's not a slam-dunk that it's right, like you implied in your closing paragraph. Heck, had you dropped the whole last paragraph from the original post, I wouldn't have quibbled about the piece at all.
But in that paragraph, you slammed your readers — "It shouldn't be difficult to understand this fact, though we always get angry comments from people who have trouble grasping it" — yet you didn't make a convincing enough argument that the slam was justified. Certainly the articles you linked to didn't make the case for you.
I sincerely hope the H-1B program is truly being used for its intended purpose, and therefore your conclusion (and slam) are truly justified.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Skills
The US Department of Labor numbers show that most H-1B recipients are classified in the bottom quartile in terms of credentials, knowledge, and experience, i.e. they're newbies, not "highly skilled", and they're doing ordinary work, not work that requires skills unavailable anywhere in the USA. Indeed, the DoL strategic plan asserted that H-1Bs can be handed out even if more capable and willing US citizens are applying for the same job.
http://wistechnology.com/article?id=4228
You are correct to mention the international ties that form. Ron Hira has pointed out that H-1B visas are widely used to facilitate off-shoring, with one H-1B present in the USA for every 2 jobs set up over-seas. The H-1Bs and L-1s visa grantees act as liaisons, a means to obtain additional contracts, and a means to transfer knowledge from the USA to those at the off-shore facilities.
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=how_guestworkers_promote_outsourcing
For eign students receive financial aid from both state and federal governments. About 26% of foreign students' tution and fees are subsidized. It gets more complicated because tuition and fees are generally set so that they cover 25% to 33% of the total costs for their education, while the rest is covered by state and federal tax-victims. (This goes through cycles and there is variation from state to state.) This implies that the foreign student is paying 74% of about 30% of total costs, or about 22% of what their education costs, while US students are paying about 30% of the total costs of their education.
http://www.nysun.com/article/70731
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That's not financial aid -- that's work that they're getting paid for.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
financial aid, subsidized work
"A growing influx of foreign PhDs into U.S. labor markets will hold down the level of PhD salaries to the extent that foreign students are attracted to U.S. doctoral programs as a way of immigrating to the U.S.A. A related point is that for this group the PhD salary premium is much higher [than it is for Americans], because it is based on BS-level pay in students' home nations versus PhD-level pay in the U.S.A... [If] doctoral studies are failing to appeal to a large (or growing) percentage of the best citizen baccalaureates, then a key issue is pay... A number of [the Americans] will select alternative career paths... For these baccalaureates, the effective premium for acquiring a PhD may actually be negative."
http://www.nber.org/~peat/PapersFolder/Papers/SG/NSF.html
http://www.nber.org/~peat/Rea dingsFolder/PrimarySources/TimeLine.html
Policy and Research Analysis Division of the NSF
http://www.ucop.edu/ucophome/pres/comments/numbers.html
"A decade after lambasting the National Science Foundation (NSF) for botching a study of the science job market, Congress has asked the agency to once again take on the politically risky task of predicting how many high-tech workers the United States will need over the next decade... Nonetheless, such projections can spark a political fire-storm, as NSF learned after a 1987 study, led by Peter House, warned of a coming 'shortfall' of several hundred thousand scientists. After the forecast proved false, law-makers questioned the agency's reputation for dispassionate analysis (Science, 1992 February 14, p. 788)."
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/vol282/issue5395/s-scope.dtl
1998-12-04 vol 282 issue 5395
Gene Nelson
http://psyche.uthct.edu/nes/wwwboard/messages/53.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"separate the abuses" with magic kool-aid?
From the word go, hhe H1-B visa program was flawed and easily exploited. How exactly do you "separate the abuses" when such abuses are intentionally built/designed into the program.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "separate the abuses" with magic kool-aid?
Er how about by not allowing the abuses any more? The program is supposed to only allow jobs to highly skilled workers if there aren't equivalent American workers available. Now, clearly many companies skirt, bend or outright flaunt those rules. So the way you stop abuses is by cracking down on the companies that to do that and make sure others live up to the rules.
To think that you can't separate out the abuses from the legitimate cases is folly. There are many legitimate uses and users of H-1Bs. To throw out those uses because some firms abuse the process makes no sense.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the H-1B program is a fraud and an abuse in and of
It was created as the result of fraudulent talent shortage claims (which continue to this day without a scrap of credible evidence to bolster them).
The abuse takes the forms of under-paying the visa grantee. This is done mostly by defining the "prevailing wage" requirement (rather than prevailing local market total compensation) in such a way that the visa-holder can be, by a number of means, legally paid 7% or 13% or 15% or 40% below the actual local market compensation for the kind of work and the credentials, education, talent and experience of the individual doing it. These numbers are from memory and based on various studies by university research teams, individual researchers as part of a professional association examination, GAO and the DoL Office of Inspector General, best summarized by Norman Matloff of UC Davis:
http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/PrevWage.pdf
And the abuse consists of the guest-workers, especially those with pending green card applications, being required to work extra hours without even straight-time pay.
But mostly from being cowed from raising any objection to working conditions on threat of termination of sponsorship and deportation.
And there's also quite a bit of abuse in the form of visa over-stays, which has caused an explosion of illegal aliens in Silicon Valley who are of Indian and Chinese extraction.
Do a few searches, the articles and reports are not difficult to find.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is even more complicated to access a permanent residency status, with a cost upwards of 25K to be shouldered by the employer. So, there is little incentive for the company to sponsor a worker for permanent status, and for the employee to stay on the longer term, and continue providing value to the economy.
At the moment I am working with an H1B visa. I just changed employers, and it is costly for my new employer, and a huge source of uncertainty for myself. It is certainly an additional thing I needed to ask as part of my negotiation with them, and made me less attractive as a worker. Thanks God things worked out well in my negotiation, otherwise, I would have ended up returning to my home country, with a practically free top notch education, thanks to the unflexible US immigration legislation.
H1B workers are taxed without representation. It is harder for us to assimilate, because the system does not want us to. All the paperwork filed insists on a 'non-immigrant' intent.
There should be a merit based system with points, similar to Canada's. You would award points based on education, language, intention to stay, family, and other parameters deemed of interest. The applicants that rank above certain threshold would be granted a visa (obviously after a security background check). An intermediate category could be subject to a lottery in order to fill up a number of applications. Furthermore, H1B visaholders, that work and pay their taxes for a certain number of years should be converted to permanent residency on an automatic basis.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lies, damn lies and statistics
For your info, we are entering a MAJOR recession in US, especially in IT
People graduating from TOP US universities with BS and MS degrees in CS and EE are having EXTREMELY difficult time finding ANY job in the field.
You need a reality check, pal
Go to dice.com discussion board:
those guys are very angry after being unemployed for a while
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
You have nothing to share
Are you one of those korporate bean counters ?
I hate those idiots
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
Dude, lern 2 dabate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
Funny, because we're still not seeing that here. Perhaps it depends on where those students are looking, but in the Valley there remains a very high level of demand for them. I know because I've been actively working with someone who has been trying to hire CS & EE grads from a top university and is having tremendous trouble hiring them, despite working for a large, recognizable tech company in Silicon Valley. They're handing out offers, but it's tough to convince the students to join because they're all getting multiple offers, and all the good ones are going to Google or Facebook. If you're not Google or Facebook right now, hiring top-notch CS students is very difficult.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
You are joking, right ?
Maybe in Houston or Chicago there is some demand (for now, until recession hits full fource and streets are littered with qualified applicants)
Valley is dead, considering cost of living
And btw Facebook is CRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
You are joking, right ?
Ah, angry dude. So like you to not admit that you might be wrong. Take a look at how many open jobs there are at Silicon Valley companies and ask any hiring manager here how easy it is to hire college grads and you'll learn just how wrong you are.
The job market remains quite hot here.
Again, that might not be true elsewhere, but in the Valley, it's tough to find good engineers.
Valley is dead, considering cost of living
And you know this from the other coast how?
And btw Facebook is CRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I don't disagree, but they're hiring like mad, and recent grads are flocking there. I wasn't making a statement on the quality of the product, just stating the fact that a lot of recent grads are going there.
Though, I guess it shouldn't surprise me that you can't separate what the discussion is actually about from some totally unrelated comment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
>degrees in CS and EE are having EXTREMELY difficult time
>finding ANY job in the field.
Yea - mythical CS and EE grads laying around with no work options...Where do you live? I graduated in 2005 - I know lots of CS/EE and even MIS grads - no one is on unemployment. Everyone is making $40K+ starting.
>Go to dice.com discussion board:
>those guys are very angry after being unemployed for a while
As far as I can tell - to be unemployed in the US with an IT related degree you need to be:
1. Not very good - for a LONG time - it takes a long time to get rid of even marginally skilled people.
2. Skilled only in something stupid and too lazy to learn anything marketable.
3. Have a MAJOR personality flaw.
4. Be completely unwilling to move or travel to where the work is.
5. Mysterious inability to show up for work regularly.
If your friends on Dice have problems landing a job - maybe they should spend less time crying on there and more time looking for work or upgrading their skills.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
have you recently tried to change your current IT job ?
Try it first and you'll know
The situatuion you describe might be true 1-2 years ago, certainly very true 10 years ago, but completely untrue today
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
On the other hand my co-workers are leaving left and right for better jobs REALLY often (out of 150 people maybe 5-7 leave a month).
The guys who I know from the ACM who are graduating this spring and in the fall all have jobs lined up.
Also, I keep getting bona fide offers from the companies I consult for.
I wish I knew any decent unemployed IT workers - I get like $5k+ for each one I bring in.
Hell if you know several unemployed IT guys - start a company - if you are unemployed (and think you will stay that way) you have $0 of opportunity cost to worry about. Lock yourselves in a virtual room and do it the way H and P of HP did it. At least it would be time better spent then complaining on Dice (to other unemployed people - which is like networking but less useful)
If you really think the IT career field is being killed by H1B's - get a couple stafford loans and go back to school and change fields...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
25 ? 30 ?
Well, talk to you in 10 years.....
IT career is like sports with the only difference that you don't make nearly as much money to retire at 40 or even 50...
After 50 you are done in IT. Make sure you save enough money (or at least get couple patents for yourself to make a switch from IT to litigation)
Wonderful wonderful career !!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and statistics
Late 30's - I went to school late - mostly to make sure I stayed employable once all of the semi-skilled keyboard pounding IT jobs moved overseas.
>After 50 you are done in IT. Make sure you save enough money
>(or at least get couple patents for yourself to make a switch
> from IT to litigation)
Not really. I know you hear it a lot, but that does not make it true. Sure, you don't find a lot of 50 year olds pounding out code - but it would be kind of sad if they were still doing that after 30 years in the industry.
Obviously, like any other skilled job, those that did not keep current or move up the ladder fell by the way-side - that accounts for some of your perceived lack of 50 year olds in IT today. The rest is a combination of the people who did retire, the fact that 30 years ago the IT industry was a LOT smaller then it is now (there were less people - now they are spread thinner), and many of the employers did not exist even 10 years ago.
In the "brick and mortar" companies of the world you see a lot of 50 year olds - less then 25 year olds, but again you should expect this in any growing field.
>Wonderful wonderful career !!!!
I think so, you have to love a meritocracy...Especially a global meritocracy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and statis
Code or no code, it's just hopeless when you are 50 and forced to compete in all of the latest technologies with new college grads
Call it "burnout", it happens to everyone and it will happen to you, sooner or later
Unless you move into project management you are done in IT after 50
There are no 50 year old professional athletes
Keep saving money dude and start thinking about some other career before it's too late
Heck, you are already waaaay too old to work for Google or Facebook
Trust me on this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and st
>forced to compete in all of the latest technologies with
>new college grads
There's the crux of the problem - You should be staying current because it is your job - not complaining about being "forced" to compete against new college grads. Really - if you can't compete with someone with 30 years less experience then you - you should go.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
age discrimination
As to "staying current", with the creation of the H-1B visa program, there were several practices that had been common which firms dropped:
1. Willingness to fly in US citizens from around the country for interviews.
2. Willingness to relocate capable US citizens from around the country and from one city where a company had a facility to another.
3. Willingness to invest in education and training of both new-hires and retained employees.
It was body shopping, and in particular cross-border body shopping made possible by E-3, H-1B and L visas, that precipitated these changes and reduced the proportion of US citizen new grads and experienced professionals who could quickly land and then keep real, full-time permanent jobs. It is extremely odd in that several studies have indicated that it takes an experienced computer worker about 2 weeks to learn an additional programming language or operating system. In contrast, most of the "new" stuff in the last 10-20 years has been a proliferation of frameworks (OK, and certain kinds of tools with proliferating options), many of which duplicate functionality, but which were alleged to provide easy to assemble building blocks per the OO philosophy. It can take anywhere from a week to 2 years to productively use a new framework.
"U.S. engineers... [are] more creative, excelled in problem solving, risk taking, networking and [have] strong analytical skills..."
http://www.kermitrose.com/econ200707.html#20070702
"Dozens of employers asked to compare American engineers to their much-vaunted colleagues from India and [Red China] agreed that 'in education, training, quality of work, you name it, in every which way, Americans are better'. Even the best schools in those countries 'don't hold a candle to our best schools.', he continues. Newly hired American university graduates 'become productive within 30 days or so. If you hire a graduate of an Indian university, it takes between 3 and 6 months for them to become productive.'"
http://www.kermitrose.com/econ200801.html#20080104
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies, damn lies and st
Yeah, they tend to become managers, announcers, or commentators...
It's my understanding that if you're still doing the same thing after 30 years that you were when you entered, you've done something wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The real test: change the price structure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have managed 15-20 h1-b holders in past. Most of them have mediocre technical skills.
However some H1-b application are legitimate like phd holders.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
H1B Aren't That Skilled In My Personal Experience
Don't get me wrong here -- I know these people personally and consider many of them my friends. But H1B is just a ticket for some corporations to increase their profit margins at the expense of workers -- it's that simple.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
international students...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: international students...
Any foreign student (or any foreign person) with a graduate degree, and who has stayed out of trouble, should be offered a green card upon graduation (or upon request).
If there is a problem with H1B's it is that we make the holders leave after 6 years.
We (the US) should be trying to corner the market on smart people.
Our economy - like any other - grows when we have more smart, hard working people living here, buying homes, buying cars, raising families, and paying taxes - no matter where they are from.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: international students...
A mere PhD does not make one "best and brightest". You've got to do a lot more to qualify for that appelation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Beyond The Economics
Jeremy's point is not without merit, but I would dispute that the long-term harm done to the economy by such practices is particularly severe, and in any case higher education in the United States -and to a lesser extent my own country- is run on a commercial basis; if the government wants to incentivise the intake of domestic students over international ones (and there are probably reasons why that's not a bad idea), I'm sure there are better ways to do it than making it harder for international students to get visas to attend courses after they've been accepted.
Anyway, I would suggest that the best way to put a stop to the misuse of the H-1B visa might just be to convince employers to look a little harder before they give up looking for a candidate from the local area who doesn't suck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How NOT to hire an American worker!
Haven't you heard about "TUBEGATE" thee infamous video, "How NOT to Hire an American Worker".
Korporate AmeriKa (sic) does want to let you know what is happening in the job market!
but if your interested..... go to
www.youtube.com/programmersguild
and for more
www.eng-i.com/E-Newletters.htm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How NOT to hire an American worker!
www.eng-i.com/E-Newsletters.htm
for the real news on H-1B
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
>^..^
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
H1B and EB green card programs defraud Americans
At the very least, American job applicants in these cases should be informed that the jobs they are applying for are already being held by foreign workers on H1B visas. But, just like every other aspect of the H1 visa and EB green card programs, the essential details are intentionally hidden from the American public.
The H1B visa program and the EB green card program work together to defraud American workers and drive them out of their chosen careers. This is just another reason to shut down both the H1B visa and EB green card programs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
europe from a mexican point of view.
Then, i tried to find a job, and it was quite easy here in france. Tehy didnt care i wasn't french nor european, they sad it was great having people from everywhere (as long as they were qualified) so we can have different points of view, opinions, way of doing things). A prove of that is that in my company we are around 2100 people, with 65% of french guys and the rest are non-french, and between 5-10% non europeans. so they see clearly the advantage of having immigrants.
Comming back to the mexican engineer working in the US, they are looking for jobs in europe (and not leaving the US to go back to mexico). For the salarys they begin at 40keuros, so around 60k dollars. (and we don't have to pay an extra health insurance, like in your film sicko).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
education
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unemployment versus H-1B Program
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Umm...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A show of hands, please
Personally, I know about a dozen, and I'm not terribly social. I just managed to jump into a new job myself before my previous company was about to lay me off after 8 months.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A show of hands, please
If an idiot, under-skilled, foreigner, and not top of the heap guy as me (and most of the H1B applicants), is able to create jobs for programmers, why all these capable programmers are not creating it themselves?
Are H1B defrauding Americans? Should we all foreigners return home? How is the country going to stay competitive if people educated on US money is jettisoned back to their home countries?
Look to Universities' admissions statistics. Arguably, there should not be any benefit for a school on admitting a foreigner, yet, the most renowned technical institutes have a very large fraction of foreigners as students or PhD candidates. The school is willing to pay guys like me to study and do research at the same time.
If you are capable, you too can study for free. That is why this is the land of opportunity. Meritocracy they call it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People are high in demand with certain skills.
Those people become short in supply.
Because of supply and demand being in favor of the EMPLOYEES, they get paid high salaries.
High salaries drive up interest in the field and people flood to study that as a career.
Available workers in that field increase, driving down costs for employers.
Here is how corporations want this to work:
We want lots of people with a certain skill and we don't want employees to have any control over anything and want supply and demand to ALWAYS be in our favor so we'll just stack the deck by hiring people on H1Bs or outsourcing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
india talent
Indian people are skillful, reliable and valuable for organizations that why every organization have demand for indian skilled employees
[ link to this | view in chronology ]