Unnecessary Anti-Phishing Law Potentially Even Worse Than First Thought
from the totally-unnecessary-and-totally-damaging dept
Last month, we wrote about a bill proposed in the Senate that would outlaw phishing even though phishing is already illegal. If it merely restated that phishing was illegal, that would be one thing (a basic waste), but it also added some other points that were problematic, including taking away the right to anonymity in registering domain names. It turns out the bill may actually be much worse than that -- but it may depend on how it's read. The EFF has gone through the bill and claims that the bill would also outlaw the use of a trademark in a domain name. Thus, things like "sucks sites," which are currently legal, could now be considered illegal. The EFF also claims that it would not allow you the use of someone else's domain name in an email, web ad or on a website. As the EFF notes, if the domain name is used in a confusing manner, that's already a trademark violation. To completely ban it seems not just over the top, but dangerous. If you look through the text of the bill, it does seem to grant some leeway in determining what actually constitutes phishing, but it's certainly broad enough that the law can be abused. Considering that it isn't at all necessary since existing laws cover phishing, is there any reason to allow this bill to go forward, other than to have some Senators get a headline in their local newspapers about how they're tough on phishing?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: anti-phishing, eff, free speech, senate, trademarks
Companies: eff
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just another day in US politics
With that out of the way, this is nothing really new I've noticed. Politicians seem to be pushing unnecessary laws more and more often. It's part of a greater problem in America. One of many side effects that would vanish if things were different.
Essentially, mostly greedy people enter politics. They want more money and more power, never mind that the majority are multi-millionaires before they run for office.
As careful as the Founding Fathers were, I don't think they imagined how things could get out of hand and that the American public would vote people into office that don't have the intention of sticking to the original principals of America.
I say original principals because things ARE different now. As much as I'd love for shit to get back in gear and for this country to turn around, it is just not going to happen without a huge civil movement behind it.
There are a lot of things that have been done to this country to strip away our rights, and most don't even realize it. Even seemingly innocent things such as limiting the number of Representatives.
Did you know that? The House of Representatives is supposed to grow with the population. Originally, one Representative for every 30,000 people. This was to ensure that the voice of the public was heard. Mathematically it has been worked out that 50,000 or 60,000 to one ratios are better balanced between providing enough voice for a State and keeping the number down.
Instead, Congress limited the number of Representatives. They limited the voice of some people, some States. Some States that should have more than one Representative are limited to the minimum of one while a handful of States are given a majority.
All so that the House will not go above the arbitrary number 435.
I imagine that if the number of Representatives could be what it was, it would be a _lot_ harder to bribe our Congressmen to pass stupid laws. Stupid laws like the one this article describe would similarly be more difficult to pass.
I hope America finds itself again someday. The Experiment still has great Potential, it just needs _true_ patriots to make it succeed at its _real_ intent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Just another day in US politics
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More problems with bill
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Phishing isn't the problem. Fraud is the problem.
Most phishing sites are hosted on compromised home PCs or insecure servers as part of ever rotating botnets. The perps and the data they are given remain outside the US. Zero impact to phishing. Lots of collateral damage.
Bad legislator. Bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only a few of us have a right to domain names. Most of you have only the right to breathe, as long as the air isn't in tubes. So this law is for your own good because it will ensure that fishing is good for the fishermen (you) and the people who own the tubes (my constituents, er, my friends, er, the telcos). Now go back to watching American Idol and be quiet. Next we need to outlaw the ability to make anonymous comments on the tubes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]