Turns Out P2P Filters Don't Actually Work

from the so-much-for-that-plan dept

Tue, Apr 1st 2008 7:20am — Mike Masnick

While ISPs are succumbing to pressure from the entertainment industry to start using traffic shaping products to filter out P2P traffic, there's been little examination as to whether or not those products actually work. Until now. While the findings aren't complete, what did come through loud and clear is that most vendors of such products don't have very much faith in their own products. Internet Evolution went to test 28 such products -- and 23 refused to let the tests happen. Of the five that they could test, three were so unhappy with the results that they forbade Internet Evolution from publishing the results. In other words, most of these products just don't work.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: p2p filtering

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

AC, 1 Apr 2008 @ 7:37am

Mmmm... Stir Fry
Mike - Typo in the headline.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Soy... sauce?, 1 Apr 2008 @ 8:41am
  
  Re: Mmmm... Stir Fry
  I'm a lo mien and wonton fan myself. Woka Woka Woka!
  
  Hmm. Now I'm hungry.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike (profile), 1 Apr 2008 @ 8:43am
  
  Re: Mmmm... Stir Fry
  Oops. Fixed, thanks.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Apr 2008 @ 7:41am

Whenever legal tries to run the IT department, it just doesn't work out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Apr 2008 @ 7:52am

So how many companies are running out and buying the programs from the two companies whose software actually worked?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AMusingFool (profile), 1 Apr 2008 @ 7:57am

they need permission why, exactly?
And how can they be forbidden to publish the results? They got the copies for free, with conditional publishing? Then why not buy the software, and publish the results?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gunnar, 1 Apr 2008 @ 8:29am

My guess is these filtering programs aren't cheap, and Internet Evolution doesn't have the review budget of, say, Consumer Reports.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pete Valle, 1 Apr 2008 @ 8:57am

Won't Wok
I had a weird mental picture of Mike trying to get programs to use a wok for him...

Anyways, I think that, no matter how much the filters suck, ISPs are going to continue to use them, just to save face.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
comboman, 1 Apr 2008 @ 9:19am

Isn't this a good thing?
ISPs can tell MPAA/RIAA they installed filters. Customers can still use P2P. Win-win?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ReallyEvilCanine, 1 Apr 2008 @ 10:16am

Block what and how?
How exactly are ISPs going to filter encrypted µTorrent streams running on any of a few thousand otherwise IANA reserved ports that the torrent users themselves don't need but other users and businesses do?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Isn't it expected?, 1 Apr 2008 @ 11:38am

And we're surpised?
Given we cant get independent evaluations of voting machines why are we surprised?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]