H-1Bs Run Out Almost Immediately Yet Again
from the april-fools dept
Just like last year, and as pretty much everyone expected, US immigration officials note that they've received tons of applications for H-1B visas -- way more than the 65,000 allowed by Congress, just in the first day of eligibility. That means that they'll switch to a lottery system and, once again, plenty of highly skilled technology talent will be working for foreign competitors rather than US companies. It's truly a shame that so many people in this country seem to incorrectly think that jobs are a zero-sum game. Bringing more highly skilled workers into this country helps create more jobs. The idea that allowing workers into the country decreases jobs here (or even decreases wages) is simply incorrect. Those workers still exist and will still compete with you for jobs -- it's just that they'll be doing it in other countries where they can undercut you even further and put even more pressure on your own company to close up shop. Not allowing skilled workers into this country is a much bigger risk for American jobs than letting them in.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: h-1b visas, immigration
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Theme Song to this post: "Shave and a haircut- Two bits"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
highly skilled. India has special schools set up to give people just enough training to pass the 'sniff test' (or 'moron in a hurry'), and then they go work for big consulting firms that farm them out to unsuspecting clients.
I've never heard of a highly skilled H1B worker on the East Coast working in the finance industry. The West Coast does have plenty of real H1B talent.
But, the vast majority of visas *are* given to people who are cheaper than US workers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I am not sure about that. I think it's still an issue of supply vs. demand. Schools should be teaching more tech skills.
I think we're really doing a disservice to the next generation in that area by essentially importing skill sets instead of trying to grow the skill sets within the schools. But there have been some great inroads and fascinating success stories-- "High Tech High" is a concept high school in Los Angeles that has had good success with a tech-based curriculum, and also aligns nicely with the "Strong American School" program. Eric Schmidt also recently took notice and hosted an insightful discussion about the changes education needs to be cognizant of in a
wired world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/general-skilled-migration/index.htm
Trying to plan a move to the States wasn't worth the hassle of waiting for a 'lottery' visa application.
I now earn more than many Australians because they have jobs that need done and not enough people to do them. This is partly to a fast growing economy (no recession here) and an aging population where people are retiring.
There is a healthy demand for skilled workers here and employers do try to train young locals but they still aren't able to recruit all the staff they need locally.
Only allowing skilled workers over non-skilled workers does however have a drawback with many vacancies in unskilled areas not being filled.
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/the-new-drought-151-workers/2008/03/24/12062070123 76.html
A healthy balance is needed between skilled and unskilled workers if an economy is to grow and if you limit workers when they are needed, skilled or unskilled then you risk your Countries growth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/general-skilled-migration/index.htm
Thanks for the link! But I don't like the numbers...
Management Consultant = 50 points
Chef = 60 points
I guess I took the wrong job. Maybe it's not too late for a career change. Heh.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Hmm. JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Bloomberg, Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse... are all listed in the top 100 recipients of H-1B visas.
So, yes, they do work on the east coast in the finance industry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You misunderstood me. I didn't say I've never heard of anyone working in the finance industry who has an H1B, I just said that I've never heard of anyone who was highly skilled.
There's a subtle difference: in the finance industry, they are all trained at special schools in India, just sufficiently enough to pass the 'sniff test' and able to spout the proper set of TLAs. They generally have no experience and couldn't code their way out of a high school programming constest.
I work in San Jose / Palo Alto and have seen my fair share of incompetence through the H1B system -- and most of these people are hired as warm bodies to fill expansion slots, but they have generally low qualifications and salary.
However, as contrary evidence that supports your theory, over the last 12 years I've seen a dramatic shift in the type of resumes that are received. 12 years ago, at a famous tools developer we were told that all resumes must go to HR because there were questions being raised about why the company was all young white males. Very low diversity. But, that was because of the resumes received. (Most of those people were not qualified either, but they were home grown).
Now, most of the resumes which I see are either of people from the Indian subcontinent, or from China -- mostly H1B. Very rarely do I see a resume from a native US citizen.
The quality of the resumes has not improved, but the asking wage has most certainly dropped.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
1) There are quite a few. Lurking in the Math Wiz basements of moajor banks. Probably you never been to that part of the building, though.
2) Try to get to business school (I mean, try to get a loan) without permanent residentship, and you'll know why you don't see H1B's above the surface much. Although it's changing right now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's hard to know who to believe
It certainly makes sense that if we need more skilled people than are present in this country, we should, at least in the short term, allow in as many as needed to fill the empty slots, and in the long-term, train more Americans in those skills. But it sure sounds to me as if a lot of the people being brought in are displacing American workers. How can I tell whether what I'm reading is just the result of misunderstanding or propaganda, or is true documentation of exploitation of cheap, foreign guest workers to lower American company costs at the expense of local workers?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's hard to know who to believe
First off, that would be an obvious and egregious abuse of the system, and anyone in such a situation should file a complaint.
I've heard such stories with offshoring, but not with H1B. I don't deny that it happens (I'm sure it does), but I doubt that it's particularly common.
But, more to the point, this doesn't mean that "everybody gets to keep their current jobs." There's NO system that guarantees that. Most of the complaining people are ones who hoped to just sit and keep their jobs forever. That's not how the world works. But, it's undeniable that bringing in more skilled workers creates more jobs in the long run. It may increase churn in the short term, but at a long term advantage.
And articles about engineers with quite respectable skillsets not being able to find jobs, and they blame it on employers who are relying on low-cost H1B workers.
Again, people who lose their jobs like to blame it on all sorts of things, but anecdotal stories do little to prove things. Right now in CA it's nearly impossible to hire a skilled engineer. It may be a different story in other locations, but either way, the point these out of work engineers are making is flat out wrong.
If these same highly skilled individuals go back to their home countries, and these same companies *offshore* the jobs to them in those foreign countries, the same workers are still out of work. Or, if those same folks go back to their home countries and work for local companies that completely undercut the American company, such that it needs to lay people off, how are the American workers better off?
It's simple. They are not.
The folks who complain about H-1Bs are pretending we live in a world that we don't. They're pretending that a worker who is in another country isn't competing against them, when he is. They're pretending that the number of jobs is a zero sum game, and having more skilled workers doesn't lead to more jobs.
They're wrong.
And articles about salary surveys that document H1B workers' pay as substantially below industry averages.
Again, that's an abuse of the system. The H-1B rules are clear that they need to pay a prevailing wage. I recognize that many firms do not abide, but then let's get rid of the abuse, not the whole system.
It certainly makes sense that if we need more skilled people than are present in this country, we should, at least in the short term, allow in as many as needed to fill the empty slots, and in the long-term, train more Americans in those skills.
Again, you assume a zero sum game. That there's some permanent number of "jobs" in the US. That's simply not true. If you can bring in a skilled worker who will create an innovation that will lead to 100,000 new jobs, do you not let him into the country because he would take the job of one American who would not create that innovation?
How can I tell whether what I'm reading is just the result of misunderstanding or propaganda, or is true documentation of exploitation of cheap, foreign guest workers to lower American company costs at the expense of local workers?
Again, the H-1B is not supposed to be about cheap labor (and, yes, again, I know that it's often abused otherwise -- but it's not as widespread as H-1B haters make it out to be).
And the way to understand what's real is to simply look at the history of any country that lets in skilled workers, and see what it does to their overall industrial output and jobs numbers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's hard to know who to believe
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: It's hard to know who to believe
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's hard to know who to believe
Very well put. I'd like to highlight that the majority of the venom spit against the H1B visa program is done by the likes of Lou Dobbs, Fox News, etc... These "journalists" drown their audience in nothing but anecdotal, tear-jerking stories about down-and-out "americans" and tout nonsensical statistics typically without context or stating sources.
Those who question the benefit of the H1B visa program because of "what they read and hear" really ought to take a good hard look at what they "read and hear" Look beyond the eye-catching, heart-plucking headlines.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If high paying tech jobs that these H1Bs are applying for in America are so readily available outside of the United States, then why are they in such a massive rush to apply for the jobs in the US *in the first place*?!
I'm really tired of these apologists coming up with any excuse to justify selling out the American worker. I have nothing against anyone anywhere trying to get the best job they can acquire. I DO have a major problem with corporations that are using "there's no talent in America" as a cover for "there's no talent in America THAT WE ARE WILLING TO PAY".
Why should the mega-corporation get to select the cheapest labor from a GLOBAL pool of resources, while the worker doesn't get the same choice for THEIR services and goods? I'm sorry if I demand six figures for my job rather than $20k/yr, but I also don't have the option of bypassing my $4/gal milk in the US for a nickel a gallon milk somewhere overseas.
It is all a scam to find the cheapest suitable labor in the global pool by rigging the game. It's very interesting how people like Michael and CEOs tout how fantastic capitalism is and supply and demand is . . . until supply and demand is no longer in their favor.
If your product is in short supply, I have to pay more for it. If labor is in short supply, YOU should have to pay more for the labor. Not just import a bunch of it as a big "screw you" to local labor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
'If your product is in short supply, I have to pay more for it. If labor is in short supply, YOU should have to pay more for the labor. Not just import a bunch of it as a big "screw you" to local labor.'
Are you implying that US should stop importing more oil from other countries and use its own resources (however scarce they are or use strategic oil reserves to meet the demand), raise the price to $20/gallon etc. etc. ? Shall we implement the same model to ALL commodities US is currently importing including Japanese cars, Chinese furniture and almost every other thing.
And US shall also 'flourish' their own people and economy and stop setting up Intel, Dell, Microsoft, IBM, Honeywell and other factories in China and India etc.
My friend, I know it hurts when someone from outside comes and takes your place. But one should also realize that there must be some business/logical reason why this is happening. May be the local resource is too costly, may be it is not efficient, may it is not available and so on and so forth.
Take it easy.
Best regards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Thank you for resorting to insults. It makes it clear that you have a strong argument.
If high paying tech jobs that these H1Bs are applying for in America are so readily available outside of the United States, then why are they in such a massive rush to apply for the jobs in the US *in the first place*?!
I didn't say that the jobs in their home countries were as high paying. So, let's knock out that strawman.
I don't deny that the jobs here pay better, but that doesn't change the point.
I'm really tired of these apologists coming up with any excuse to justify selling out the American worker.
Again, how is creating more jobs selling out the American worker? How is increasing innovation and growing the economy selling out the American worker?
Do you really think that when you send these folks back to their home countries they're not still competing? Do you really think that if they go back to their home country it doesn't impact jobs here?
You are incorrect if you do.
It is all a scam to find the cheapest suitable labor in the global pool by rigging the game. It's very interesting how people like Michael and CEOs tout how fantastic capitalism is and supply and demand is . . . until supply and demand is no longer in their favor.
Where have I ever complained about supply and demand not being in my favor? The only complaint here is that the American gov't is LIMITING natural supply. It's protectionism, not capitalism.
If your product is in short supply, I have to pay more for it. If labor is in short supply, YOU should have to pay more for the labor. Not just import a bunch of it as a big "screw you" to local labor.
First of all, take a look at salary data for engineers. Salaries keep going up. So, it's a total strawman to claim that this is about lowering wages.
That said, can you explain what happens when these folks go back to their home countries and start competing against you and put your company out of business? Then how does that help your job? How does that help the American economy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
> Salaries keep going up. So, it's a total strawman to
> claim that this is about lowering wages.
2% wage increases average are not 'going up'. They are pay cuts. If there wasn't an artificially created pool of cheap labor to fill in, then the wages would go up even more: supply and demand. When wages are going up less than the cost of living increases, then you don't have a shortage.
If there is no shortage AND you are importing workers...
how can you claim honestly that there is a shortage?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Anecdotes do not count, regardless of how many dozens Lou Dobbs has shown you this year so far.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But somehow when it comes to the tech industry, the answer isn't related to supply and demand. When it comes to the tech industry, they artificially bend supply and demand to the corporate side's favor by importing extra supply.
The guy above who says that he moved to AUS instead of the US because of our "protectionism" (what the hell are you talking about? the problem is a LACK of protectionism) has some deeply flawed logic. If he moved to the US, he wouldn't keep that fantastic salary he's getting in AUS right now, because he would be competing with the flood of imported labor.
Also, it doesn't matter how much imported labor is being paid in relation to local labor. The fact is that they may both be paid the same (but I doubt it). However, if the labor wasn't imported, then the local labor salaries WOULD HAVE TO INCREASE because of the lack of supply compared to the demand. So even if they're getting paid the same, they are impacting us by avoiding an INCREASE in our salaries.
If supply and demand economics is good enough for corporations, it should be good enough for me. But they want to fuck me in the ass with it when it suits them and shrug it off with bullshit workarounds like H1Bs and the lies that "there's no skilled labor here!" when it doesn't suit them and, instead, favors the worker.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you think that 65,000 visa bringing in employees is a "problem", then you truly don't understand the size of the work force in the US. Please define "flood".
...thus making the US company even less competitive and put pressure on that company to send those higher-paying technical jobs ... where? ... to those skilled workers living elsewhere (either via offshoring or by losing business to foreign competitors).
It is good enough for you. And if you only concentrate on the next move in any game, economics included, then you will most certainly lose the game. You are worrying about an "american" losing-this-one-job instead of looking at the implications of keeping-this-one-job.
Instead of throwing back micro-scale points, which Mike has addressed, why not attack his macro-scale points?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Live and work in the USA
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I hope they take your job next - Fawktard!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Yup. Now don't you wish some of those folks creating jobs in foreign countries were working here helping to create more jobs in the US?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
> in foreign countries were working here helping to create
> more jobs in the US?
What? In a job losing economy, you want more cheap labor to create jobs? That just doesn't bear up with reality.
Take a look at the devastating impact illegal workers have caused in the construction industry (particularly in the southeast). Wages have dropped. Now you've got unskilled Mongolian hordes building houses for 1/2 the price of the citizens. How is this a good thing? Where do the laid-off workers go to get a job in a shrinking economy if they have to compete with lower-waged immigrants, legal and illegal?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
That said, I don't agree with the argument that "illegal workers are destroying the construction industry" either. Either the jobs are worth less and so wages should be lower, or the skilled workers are truly far more productive so as to justify the higher wages. If the work can get done at lower wages, why should customers support paying higher prices??
Wal-mart is successful for a reason, the ultimate being that they cater to the customer's desire for lower prices as the foremost priority.
[In fact, I'll retract my statement about construction workers having to be local...housing is moving more and more to pre-fab, meaning outsourcing of more jobs to foreign factories and lowering the skills requirements for installation of these structures. The skilled workers losing their jobs should be looking to innovate (e.g. work with or create construction technologies such as pre-fabs) or they need to change vocations...this is simple economic forces at work.]
Don't shoot the messengers. Point out problems with the economic arguments and we've got a discussion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Now, what caused that? Was it because of 65000 H1B visas (of which only 1/12 would be attributed to the month of March)?
Or is it because the US is failing to compete with skilled workers living abroad? Who could live and work here in the US, innovating and creating new jobs IN THE US?
Simply pointing at a CNN headline means nothing. The article uses sensationalist language and numbers that scare, but if you actually read the article it boils down to the fact that "this is the worst fall in employment in 5 years".
5 years?? We're freaking out over a change that hasn't been seen in 5 years? This is nothing more than a normal economic cycle at this point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Strange Coincidence
Why is the tech industry so special? In every other industry, a lack of skilled workers results in companies paying HIGHER SALARIES to draw those skilled workers in. That causes people to flood schools seeking education for those areas so that they can graduate and fill the industry needs, eventually resulting in a somewhat lower salary overall, because the demand and supply are more even. THAT is capitalism. THAT is how it has always been."
Anonymous has hit the issue dead on. Isn't it amazing how Mike Masnick consistently is pushing big tech's agenda, patent deform & H1B? A really strange coincidence.
Ronald J. Riley,
Speaking only on my own behalf.
Affiliations:
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.patentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Strange Coincidence
Drawing from the global supply may lower salaries but only because that's the natural state of the supply/demand dynamic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Strange Coincidence
It is not special - it is just that you can find IT guys outside of US more easily. And also, that 'generally' it is not a threat to national security hiring non-US professionals for the job.
It is difficult to find Aerospace engineers or Nuclear scientists out of US especially in the context that these are usually highly classified jobs.
Other skill sets of civil and mechanical engineers are also not that easy to grab since it requires quite some facilities at universities which all foreign students cannot afford to get - means they are not 'that' qualified in the first place. Whereas, software engineering does not require sophisticated lab equipment so they are in abundance.
Having said that, there are still people working on H1B in automobile industries and others (go to any hospital and you will know that it is correct).
@Anonymous Coward: Instead of using filthy language, bring out arguments objectively. We are sharing our thoughts and experiences which vary from individual to individual. And yes, I am sure the day my company finds a better fit (either a cheaper guy who can do my job or is more efficient and can produce better results for the same cost), they will replace me. It is always 'survival of the fittest' in this cut-throat market.
Peace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
Well, that will happen if you've decided not to do something about it. You have a few choices, but from your statement it seems that you are choosing the "wait and pray" approach.
Personally, I'm working hard to find someone to do my job myself. The best way to get ahead in a corporate world is to find your own replacement and manage them (i.e. push yourself up the ladder).
Looking for an open slot above you is being a fish fighting up an ever narrowing stream. Instead prove the benefit of your current position by making it so important that you become way overloaded with work and need someone else to fulfill the role. Your one position becomes a small team, then a department, etc... Look for opportunities for your department to grow its responsibilities.
Market leaders don't become such by by waiting for other businesses to leave town first. They moved in, seize opportunities by gaps left in the current service providers and/or capitalizing on their shortcomings (e.g. over priced, poor customer service, outdated technologies, etc...). They grab new opportunities and take (or win) already serviced opportunities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Strange Coincidence
Actually, no he hasn't. He's wrong on multiple counts. For instance, in the very next paragraph:
But somehow when it comes to the tech industry, the answer isn't related to supply and demand. When it comes to the tech industry, they artificially bend supply and demand to the corporate side's favor by importing extra supply.
The tech industry does not "artificially bend" the supply and demand principle. Protectionism, which Anonymous favors, places an artificial restriction on the supply of IT workers, which runs counter to the competitive principles of capitalism.
If supply and demand economics is good enough for corporations, it should be good enough for me.
And yet, apparently, it isn't. Anonymous is trying to portray the import of skilled foreign labor as a corruption of supply and demand, when in actuality it is supply and demand in action.
Isn't it amazing how R.J. Riley consistently makes unsupported and incorrect statements and insinuates corporate affiliation despite reality?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
His know-all-butt side ?
What are your credentials to attack Mr. Riley ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
I don't care if you're a homeless highschool drop-out, if you make compelling points that are pertinent to the discussion, you're adding something. And if the only 'hole' your opposition can find in your arguments is the uneducated homeless source, then you're argument stands regardless of it's source.
Sorry, AD, I don't mean to actually engage you: I'm pretty sure you don't care. Just an irritation that's been growing since Ron showed up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
Why is that ?
The universal answer is this: follow the money, always follow the money...
The true honest journalism doesn't exists anymore - everybody is someone's pimp
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
Mike of techdirt ALWAYS sides with the BIGGEST tech multinational corporations
Except when he doesn't.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
I just don't understand what your criticism of points raised in this thread are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
This is the most hilarious argument used against me, because on half my posts, people accuse me of being a communist trying to take down big companies, and on the other half, I'm accused of being a shill for big companies.
So, angry dude, which is it? When I point out all the ridiculously bad things that big companies do, their failure to understand basic economics, and they way they abuse the political system... who am I working for then?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
"on ALL important issues (be it patent "deform" or H1-B visas) Mike of techdirt ALWAYS sides with the BIGGEST tech multinational corporations"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
"on ALL important issues (be it patent "deform" or H1-B visas) Mike of techdirt ALWAYS sides with the BIGGEST tech multinational corporations"
Ok, so in context then. Can you explain why I disagree with tech companies on patent reform? I have been quite clear that I think they're wrong in pushing for this particular form of patent reform.
Also, I question your use of "ALL" in terms of important issues. They may be the important issues to you, but I disagree with large multinational companies on many issues, including copyright, licensing rights, trade policy, net neutrality and I'm sure many other things as well...
I have told you before that we do no public advocacy work. I don't know why you continue to insist that we do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
What are your credentials to attack Mr. Riley ?
Why would I need credentials to point out the Mr. Riley doesn't know what he's talking about? The primary credentials that Riley lists at the end of his "only me" posts are self-granted, which hardly makes them significant.
I do find it amusing that you try to break it down to a "my credentials" vs. "his credentials" argument rather than actually dealing with the topic at hand. Actually, it's eerily reminiscent of Riley's attempts at discussion. You must be proud.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Strange Coincidence
Ron, you know what's even more amazing? The fact that you are completely wrong on this. I have repeatedly trashed "big techs" agenda on many topics -- including patents (despite the fact that you like to claim otherwise).
As I noted, half the time people accuse me of trying to destroy big businesses, and the other half they accuse me of being a shill. Maybe, just maybe, I simply speak my mind?
Remember, I'm not the one making money off of my positions -- you are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
In my opinion at best you spout off about issues which you are totally ignorant about and at worst you might be a stooge/shill for those companies. In the end it does not matter which because you are constantly promoting an agenda which would destroy our patent system and with it our only effective competitive advantage against low wage competition.
One last point, The Coalition for Patent fairness & PIRACY, otherwise known as the Piracy Coalition has been painting a rosy picture of passage of the Patent Deform bill. Yesterday they had two major defections. The bill is going down in flames just as I have been predicting.
One of the reasons it is in trouble is inventors are getting ready to give proponents of the bill a political hot foot right where it will cause them the greatest damage.
See: www.Docs.PIAUSA.org/PIAUSA/
We are ready to run additional ads targeting specific legislators in their home states :)
Ronald J. Riley,
Speaking only on my own behalf.
Affiliations:
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Executive Director - www.InventorEd.org - RJR at InvEd.org
Senior Fellow - www.patentPolicy.org
President - Alliance for American Innovation
Caretaker of Intellectual Property Creators on behalf of deceased founder Paul Heckel
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
You are repeatedly asking for donations from small inventors to help you run this "campaign" of yours. Do none of the organizations you so proudly represent pay you at all?
If that's the case, how are they actual organizations? What organization does not pay its President? If they do not pay you, can we assume they are merely made up organizations?
In my opinion at best you spout off about issues which you are totally ignorant about and at worst you might be a stooge/shill for those companies
Your opinion is incorrect. I'm curious as to why you claim I am ignorant on the topic when I am the one pointing to a ton of peer reviewed research and historical evidence to support my position, and you simply insult me?
One last point, The Coalition for Patent fairness & PIRACY, otherwise known as the Piracy Coalition has been painting a rosy picture of passage of the Patent Deform bill. Yesterday they had two major defections. The bill is going down in flames just as I have been predicting.
Ronald, your inability to read astounds me. I have pointed out, repeatedly, that I disagree with this bill. I don't think it helps the problems we face with the patent system. What happens with this particular reform bill one way or the other won't change my position on patents -- which is based on historical evidence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
The common perception that this patent "deform" is a fight between IT industry and everybody else is wrong.
It is a fight between several largest multinational IT/tech corporations joined by banks and insurance conglomerates AND EVERYBODY ELSE (including small and not so small IT/high-tech companies which actually produce significant inventions, like Rambus or Quallcomm or Interdigital or Amberware etc. etc. etc.)
I am IT myself and strongly against this destructive bill, because it limits my freedom as a small inventor and entrepreneur to go against the likes of Cisco, Intel or Microsoft.
Those 1 million IT employeees signing the petition on behalf of the CPF were ordered to do so by their corporate employers. None of the independent inventors/entrepreners in IT/tech would sign such a petition (I mean, of course, those entrepreneurs who actually promote progress, not the likes of Mike of techdirt)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
Heh. And amusingly, you don't think that all the patent thickets out there limit your freedoms? You've clearly never tried to bring an actual product to market.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
It's really amusing that you keep repeating this line. The only one who has been calling them "The Piracy Coalition" has been you. It's intentionally misleading on your part to constantly post this propaganda.
I understand that you're trying to get people to make this association, but it hasn't happened as of yet. It's simply your term for the organization, and nothing else.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
Do yourself a favor and rent some PBS movies like "The Pirates of Silicon Valley"
"patent pirates" or "technology pirates" is how we (small inventors) call the likes of MShit and Cisco and Intel and RIM and quite a few other large multinational tech corporations
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
Yes, and that terminology is about as accurate as the term "patent troll" that small inventors and patent abusers are always complaining about. However, I was specifically pointing out that referring to the Coalition of Patent Fairness as the "Piracy Coalition" appears to be Mr. Riley's creation, and he's the only one promoting the term (in just about every post). It isn't "also known as", it's a propaganda phrase.
You know, for someone who just accused me of being "a second reincarnation of Mike" (who's the first?), you seem to be going out of your way to defend Mr. Riley. Perhaps before trying to call me out on something, you should make sure you aren't being hypocritical.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
Says the guy that is a stooge for Rambus. You might try not signing your posts sometimes, at least your hypocrisy does not shine through quite as much. There's not much we can do about your apparent ignorance :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
Your province is idiocy and mental retardation
BTW why are you "dorpass", punk ? Do you work at Homedepot or Lowes ? Would fit you nicely in your job role: Welcome to HomeDepot, Sir. My name's dorpass. How can I help you ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
Would you care to provide an example of either?
Oh right, I forgot that backing up your statements isn't what you do.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Strange Coincidence
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No, I wish they would take their job stealing asses back where they came from so we can have our own damn jobs . DONE and DONE!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
US Workers Over-priced.
What US workers do not seem to understand is that they are not "special" like they were 50 years ago. Now, they have to compete with the world and don't seem prepared to do so. They want to maintain their high wages and yet at the same time do not understand that their company will go under if they do so.
Time for a US worker wake up call ... it's a flat world and you now have to compete globally. If there are lower wages in a foreign country that has lower costs and can sell at lower prices, they will undercut and knock you out of business. Better to bring in foreign skilled workers for a partial lowering of salaries than a complete loss of your existing ones.
US worker (anonymous cowards), close your eyes and live in the past, but understand that this is just a part of the sinking high US living standards ... plus it will continue to get worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mudak
Fir this kind of money I can keep not just one but two skilled programmers employed full time in some other parts of the globe
Do you live in a cardbox and go to free soup kitchen with the rest of the homeless punks ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: mudak
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: mudak
As Bill Clinton once said: I feel your pain (I mean the pain of older out of work tech workers who are no longer wanted by corporations)
Also I am disgusted to read all the moronic comments here:
"CS majors from Stanford and Berkeley are getting ~100k salaries this year with near universal employment BEFORE graduating"
Which planet are you from, dork ?
you mean that Stanford and berkley CS class of 2008 is going to be universally employed at 100k ?
hey, Stanford/Berkeley seniors, there is a lying piece of shit called dorpas here
kick him in the butt (unless he can show you those jobs waiting for you)
reality check: most of those CS graduates are going to have an EXTREMELY difficult time getting any jobs in IT simply because entry-level jobs don't exists anymore in IT
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: mudak
Here is one link:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Google-and-Facebook-Gear-Up-for-Battle-over-CS-Grads-77671.sht ml
If Vinnytsia gave you enough comprehension skills, may be you'll understand what they are talking about. And if you were smart enough (not necessary to graduate from Vinnytsia College of Punks, I know), you might have figured out that I am somewhere around those "poor" Stanford/Berkeley seniors you cry about. Of course, being stuck in a communal apartment in Brooklyn probably makes it hard to understand that things can be different in other places.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: mudak
"Microsoft and Yahoo are in this race as well, although numbers about their offers weren’t made public, but you know that they want the fresh minds in order to attempt to overthrow the others. It must be a good feeling to know that the biggest companies on the Internet are all checking you out."
Blya, mudak, ty chto sovsem shuyel ?
Yahoo has recently announced major layoffs.
You farking article is a bit old and quite a bit off
Google is not hiring too
Go masturbate on your school teacher, punk
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: mudak
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: mudak
Yes, of course, January 31st, 2008 was sooooo long ago. And how is it off, please do tell? What kind of insight do you have?
Google is not hiring too
Right, sitting in your cage of a home across the nation you know it for a fact. I should tell all the new Google hires that they weren't hired, it was just a dream.
While you are spewing more nonsense, you should address why you, as an immigrant, are so against other immigrants?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: mudak
I am not against other immigrants, I am against insanity
And insanity is what characterizes US nowdays, be it H1B visas, patent "deform" or foreign policy
Idiots like you will literally destroy this country, run
it to the ground, just like they did it to Enron...
but at least I have a place to go back, and you don't
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: mudak
Same policy that has become stricter since the times that your foul mouth floated in on a boat?
but at least I have a place to go back, and you don't
Oh reaaally now? One of these times you will talk about something that you actually know about it... but I won't hold my breath.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
In the short term there is plenty of fraud. H1B and illegal unskilled workers are supported by execs that are willing to bend or break the law to make their numbers and their stock options, even while they shift the cost to the tax payer.
Wonder why kids in the US don't want to go into tech? They watched the older folks get boned and figured they would be better off as investment bankers, lawyers and dentists, much harder to get offshored.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reality Check
"Yeah, and you should see the people we recruit from communist countries... talk about taking a pounding over the head without complaining about anything. Now that the golden handcuffs of the internet stock options age are gone we've resorted to the green handcuffs and cultural handcuffs. When we get foreigners they won't complain about much and can't move jobs even within the same company if it changes job description without delaying their green cards. Therefore it keeps salaries down artificially if you ask me. And then with the people we get from Russia, Ukraine, Romania, etc. they will gladly be exploited without any complaint whatsoever... they are paranoid that anything they say will be used against them by everybody being big brother. You need to hire your own folks for your own company and be the exploiter... we're old enough now to look the part if we can keep a poker face."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
idiotas
some nice read for fresh CS grads
right now anything IT/tech related is a dump with no future for any american (except for the likes of Billy Gates of MShit or Mike of techdirt)
stay out of IT, folks - you will be glad you did when you approach your forties
Better be a unionized plumber - at least they don't import cheap plumbers from India (so far...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: idiotas
- they use dice.com
- they are complaining about not having work
Realize that their circumstances might have nothing at all to do with the state of hiring in the tech industry. It is quite possible that these individuals are simply poor employees.
I've put out a few contracts to these sites, and substantially less than 10% of respondents are worth considering having in a negotiation round.
At our company, we have a serious shortage in IT talent (product managers, developers, senior QA, consultants) and have had open reqs for months. We've turned away TONS of unqualified "IT worker" resumes and have interviewed dozens only selecting about 1/3 of those we interview.
Though we have lots of work to do, we simply cannot afford to bring on dead weight. Just because someone has "Java" or "software testing" on their resume does not make them a good developer, nor a good employee. We need intelligent, team players who can communicate and be responsible to perform their duties. And there are a number of other managers in area companies I know complaining of the same thing.
We aren't looking for people with lots of experience, but we are looking for motivated people with the ability and desire to learn and work within our environment.
If by "unionized" you mean that the employee can get a position and then sit on their laurels simply doing their day-to-day task list, then it doesn't matter what field they get into...they'll eventually get replaced by someone. Even the unions cannot protect stagnant or unproductive employees. Wages increase because with time employees experience and skills improve...not because they've performed the same action time in and time out for some measure of time...though that is not what the typical union leader believes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: idiotas
I did my own research a few months back, not really looking for a job but assessing the current and future perspectives of IT in this country
Boy, was I dissapointed
Only afterwards I went to dice.com to confirm my findings
and suspicions:
Just like I thought: the tech hiring market is dead and still getting worse by the day
The 90% of jobs posted on dice.com are non-jobs, recycled over and over again by the same of different recruting agencies
After nobody local gets hired some H1-B is brought over to work for 15$ an hour (for 60-80 hour week getting paid for only 40 hour week) and to live with 5 other H1-Bs in one-bedroom appartment
You are clearly either a corporate stooge or a brainless techdirt lemming - pick one
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: idiotas
Taking a job site (Why dice? they aren't even close to the largest...) as a weather vane for the job pool is questionable at best...the kind of stunt I expect from CNN and Fox News.
How you can claim that I am not a techie is ... interesting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: idiotas
Go take more of your "management courses" to become a real bullshit artist, like Mikey
Then you'll have a wonderful career path in front of you
one day you can even run for senator or even ,God forbid, a Pres of this country
hell, the curent bunch of pres candidates aren't looking too good to tech/IT folks, all support more H1B visas, all are corporate buddies, I'm not voting this time
This country is going downhill, that's all I can tell you
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: idiotas
We aren't looking for people with lots of experience, but we are looking for motivated people with the ability and desire to learn and work within our environment."
Sounds like you need an H1-B
motivate him with an impressive 12$ hour salary so he can afford to share one-bedroom with other 5 folks like him
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
US Workforce
Good point, and maybe nature is just getting rid of the worst of the virus ... the overpaid US worker with their overuse and exploitation of the world's resources.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: US Workforce
Hey, check this out, folks: http://www.supportresort.com/
Scary, isn't it ?
3.36 $ per hour, that;s right
Doesn't even buy youi a hamburger in good old USA anymore
maybe just a kids meal
I ma out of this f****** field of tech/IT
It's all f***** up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blessed Be my fellow EARTHLINGS, Screw the rest of you brainwashed fools.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
they already do...
Yes, we need to raise the cap, but we also need to reform the way H1-Bs work. We should be auctioning off the visas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't understand my own industry
Seriously, what's going on? I see stories about the desperate need for foreign programming talent in the U.S., and yet I know so many guys who are desperate for work, know their subjects well, have years of experience, and don't even want all that much in terms of salary.
I don't have anything against competent programmers coming to the U.S. to work. I just can't understand why management has the perception that there aren't any local people to do these jobs. Hell, I can't even convince management at my office that there are plenty of good local programmers out there who need jobs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't understand my own industry
Have you brought these out-of-work individuals you know in for an interview? Have you found out why it is that your company, looking for talent, isn't hiring these individuals? Could it be that they don't have the qualifications your company (or all other companies they've interviewed with) are looking for?
Could it be that they aren't all that employable?
Just a thought. You have a job, they don't. Either you are better than they are, or you should be scared for yourself.
I find myself in the same shoes as your manager. Lots of interview candidates, very few with the skills we're looking for (intelligent, motivated, team-oriented...don't care what technology they know, as long as they can learn).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I don't understand my own industry
???????????????????
What ? Just shut the fuck up already
Companies have laundry lists of precise SKILLZ and years of experience required for each shitty position paying like 20$ an hour
When they cann't find 110% match they can hire some H1-B for 12$ and work him to death
Just leave us alone, you, corporate butt-kisser
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cause they want to hire much cheaper workers!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good bye, fuckwad Mike Masnick
Mike Masnick is the "CEO" of techdirt, so of COURSE he's going to be pro H-1B. He's one of the people who is trying to screw us over. People like him are exactly the cause of the problem in the first place.
I don't know about you guys, but I see more and more of these guys at my job, and my yearly raises have been getting more and more anemic. But you all can relate your experiences to Mike Masnick all you want ... he's never going to listen to you because all he's interested in is profits for his company, not what's actually happening to the rank-and-file IT worker.
And, my fellow IT workers, if you guys had any brains whatsoever, you'd stop reading this site. There's a million sites out there that are pro American worker and pro IT. There's really nothing special about this particular one.
If you keep reading this site, then maybe you do deserve to get replaced by one this H-1B guys that Mike seems to have a woody for.
And so, I bid you adieu.
Pete
ps- Mike Masnick, go fuck yourself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good bye, fuckwad Mike Masnick
His clients paid him to tell them what they don't want to hear. Maybe he is telling you IT workers what you guys don't want to hear for free?
You don't want to hear that foreign workers entering the country would eventually culminates in more jobs and more demand for workers like you?
Maybe Mike is just damn honest and you're biased because you live in a fantasy world where only zero sum games exist?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good bye, fuckwad Mike Masnick
You spew an awful lot of hatred towards me, but you fail to actually make an argument. In fact, you say many things that are simply incorrect.
Mike Masnick is the "CEO" of techdirt, so of COURSE he's going to be pro H-1B. He's one of the people who is trying to screw us over. People like him are exactly the cause of the problem in the first place.
I employ no H-1Bs. I've never tried to. To be honest, the process of securing an H-1B visa is so expensive and cumbersome I'm surprised so many companies bother.
My interest is certainly not in screwing over techies. I'm trying to build a business that helps employ many more of them. Why is that so problematic to you?
But you all can relate your experiences to Mike Masnick all you want ... he's never going to listen to you because all he's interested in is profits for his company, not what's actually happening to the rank-and-file IT worker.
Actually, I'm very concerned with the "rank-and-file IT worker." I'm not sure if you noticed, but a big part of our business is helping those rank-and-file IT workers make more money by providing their expertise to companies.
And, my fellow IT workers, if you guys had any brains whatsoever, you'd stop reading this site. There's a million sites out there that are pro American worker and pro IT. There's really nothing special about this particular one.
I'm really concerned as to why you would possibly think this site is not pro American worker or pro IT? In fact, I made it quite clear in the post (did you read it?) that the reason we should support more skilled workers is that they HELP this country by INCREASING jobs here.
Putting your head in the sand doesn't help. Recognizing the actual economics does.
So if you prefer to leave this site, that is fine. But it doesn't change the economics at play. I am very strongly pro-US innovation. I want to help create more new jobs in this country. But you don't do that by keeping skilled workers out. This is econ 101 stuff. Protectionism HURTS the market.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Good bye, fuckwad Mike Masnick
Hah ? That's why you want to take patents from little dudes like me and hand them over to large multinational corps ?
That's really "pro-US innovation"
(Spare us from hearing your usual bullshit about how innovation is different from invention and why a copycat is more important than original inventor...)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Good bye, fuckwad Mike Masnick
As per usual, you spew, but you do not bother to read or understand. I do not want to take patents from you and hand them over to large multinationals. I have pointed to stacks and stacks of evidence showing that without patents you actually end up with *fewer* large multinationals and many *more* smaller, more innovative entities.
In a world without patents, companies need to be quick and innovative, not slow and cumbersome. It should favor small innovative teams -- and that's exactly what history has shown.
I know you like to pretend differently, but you haven't shown any evidence to prove your point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good bye, fuckwad Mike Masnick
Not true, you obviously have never read it before, just commented on whatever insanity went through your head at the time. So if you are to say that this is the last day you ever comment here, now that will be a cause for celebration.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Consultant
This shop should be filled with young American grads in their 1st or 2nd job being paid enough to live and make payments on their very large student loans. Instead we have a flock of H1B’s that are sending half the $$’s they make home, and not investing in our economy.
They are here simply because they are the lowest bidders, not for any special knowledge. If I didn’t have very specific specialized skills I wouldn’t be here. Prior to my arrival they went through two H1B’s that claimed to have my abilities, but couldn’t cut the day to day requirements much less new projects. They, or the firms that represented them, simply lied about their experience to get them in here. This is not an unusual situation.
The last time we had 150K+ visas available I couldn’t get a contract that would pay me enough to leave the house. I’m a traveling consultant and I need 95 to 100 per hour inclusive of expenses to make it. From late 2001 to 2005 all I was offered was 45 to 50, which at that time was an after expense net of 15 to 20. As I said, that was not even worth leaving the house that I can’t pay the mortgage on at that level.
Meanwhile, an H1B will drive a used vehicle, live in a sub-standard apartment (usually with several other H1B’s), and not need to travel again until the next contract. This is almost the same as indentured servitude, which is illegal.
Since ’05 I’ve worked mostly at fixing the mistakes of those H1B’s that took the jobs I wouldn’t/couldn’t do at that price. Happily there is plenty of that kind of work, and sure to be more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Consultant
And I am surrounded by all-American educated engineers that have some engineering knowledge, but no biz knowledge. My company does not even do H1B and we still have trouble finding those young American professionals you are talking about. Having gone to school with them, I do wonder where you come up with a fairy tale of American programmers/engineers knowing much about business. It is a universal problem, they are good on technical side, not business or even common sense. You can blame it on H1B all you want, but once you get an average engineer without regard for his citizenship, you will have to come up with another lame excuse. You'll probably say it's because they wear crappy pants or don't shower enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]