Is It That Difficult To Understand The Difference Between Public Data And Private Data?
from the apparently-so... dept
Just a little while after some folks in Pittsburgh, PA sued Google over its Street View offering, it appears that Google is getting ready to launch a similar offering in Australia. However, rather than celebrate a rather useful service, there's a somewhat ridiculous newspaper article in Australia charging Google execs with hypocrisy for not revealing private data about Australian Google execs. It's hard to see where the hypocrisy is here. Google is creating a database of public info, and the newspaper, by its own admission, was asking Google to give up private data on its execs. Despite what the newspaper implies, Google's Street View doesn't reveal who lives where -- it just shows photos taken from public roadways, just as anyone would see driving up and down those same roads. To equate that with private data about executives is simply wrong.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, google maps, private data, public data, street view
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
If I were a Google exec, I would...
I'll give up the private information ONLY if you print YOUR information beside it.
Of course then I would make up a set of private data for public use, sort of like my name Ajax 4Hire.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The borings
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The borings
Exercising their right to be moronic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Speaking of hipocrites...
http:// valleywag.com/373375/google-updates-street-view-in-san-francisco-leaves-marissa-mayers-pad-off-the-g rid
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Speaking of hipocrites...
As one commenter and the article say, (and a little street view trip around the specified area shows,) it is a very high traffic area and the light was financed by the people living in the hotel (including Marissa) to improve the safety of them trying to get out of that side street.
It had nothing to do with Google, despite what that article author has apparently pulled out of his ass.
In the street view one can clearly see down the side street, perceive and dead end and garner that it wasn't necessary to drive down it for the Google maps.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Speaking of hipocrites...
I really don't care...one more stop light in a congested city. If those people were smart, they'd leave the city.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So long as...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reason
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Moronic?
Still, Google took it down with a simple request, so short of a class action, I'm not sure what the point of the lawsuit is.
Now if Google was refusing to take it down, that would be different, but it looks like it was an honest mistake of taking pictures while the van driver was trying to turn around on a narrow road that becomes a driveway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moronic?
But the lawsuit? Thats moronic. Their reasoning for it is horrible too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
when those ppl saw a multi billion dollar company they figured they would try there luck.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes. Yes it is.
Look no further than people getting upset at having their raunchy pasts (that they freely uploaded to Facebook) discovered when they apply for a new job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not necessarily true
smoking gun' that show clearly that in order to get the photographs of somebody's garage they had to have infringed on a private drive OFF of a public street.
link
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not necessarily true
Thats the same driving error as the other claim.
The road (excuse me, driveway) appears just like any other road - even bearing a name apparently - "Goldenbrook Ln.".
This sort of thing is going to happen on occasion just cause we often build our roadways in confusing manners.
Perhaps the driver assumed the folks taking in the data he gathered would realize his mistake? Perhaps he should have said something himself. Obviously more effort needs to be put into making sure the mapping is done accurately and respectfully.
But to imply this was deliberate trespassing seems to be taking some liberties with the photos on the page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of course this will all go away as soon as some killer uses this project as a tool to commit homicide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
@#15
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is it private if it's on Google?
Anyone else remember the CNET story uncovering personal information about Google's own CEO using Google itself? The one that resulted in a ban by Google on talking to CNET reporters?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Retarded Aussie rag
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google's abysmal record on privacy
Google has serious privacy "issues" which I highlighted and documented with many links to mainstream sources -- in this Precursorblog post on Google and privacy -- http://www.precursorblog.com/node/665
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google's abysmal record on privacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]