IBM Seeks Patent On Typing-To-Speech In A Call Center

from the seriously? dept

Mon, Apr 21st 2008 6:48pm — Mike Masnick

theodp writes ""Caller: What is my account balance? The call handler responds by typing in the response '250 dollars.'" That's an excerpt from a pending IBM patent for cutting offshore call center costs further by hiring reps whose local accents make them incomprehensible to their U.S. customers without the magic of IBM text-to-speech synthesis, which Big Blue explains converts typed responses into "the native language and accent of the caller so that the outgoing voice sounds familiar to the caller.""

As Theodp noted in sending this in, you would think that Stephen Hawking's computerized speech system might count as a bit of prior art. Of course, while the patent covers more than just that, it's hard to see how the idea of letting someone type responses that are converted into speech deserves monopoly protection.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: call center, patents, text-to-speech
Companies: ibm

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 21 Apr 2008 @ 7:47pm

Wow, what an amazing idea.
I'm positive that absolutely no one has ever thought of this before.

This is poster child for the patent system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jake, 21 Apr 2008 @ 8:14pm

There's just one flaw in the idea that I can see. If one can understand moderately complex sentences in another language, it's probably not that hard to be understood in turn. Unless IBM have made a really radical breakthrough in speech-synthesis technology -i.e. something that deserves a patent under the system as it's supposed to be- it would have to be a really dire connection before Stephen Hawking would be harder to comprehend than someone with an East European or South-East Asian accent. [Full disclosure: I am really rather good at comprehending such accents, since expats from those regions sell nearly all the decent fast food in this country.]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Colg, 21 Apr 2008 @ 9:28pm

"If one can understand moderately complex sentences in another language, it's probably not that hard to be understood in turn."

Thats a really bad assumption.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shohat, 22 Apr 2008 @ 1:48am

DEFENSIVE
IBM are the good guys now. And most their patents are defensive, because sometimes you need to launch those missles when attacked.

I think Sun Microsystems set a fine example when it retaliated with full and unproportional force against NetApp, claiming that the 3billion revenue company has no right to exist, and every single NetAPP product is covered by Sun's patents.
It was cute, entertaining, and effective.
IBM is just stockpiling against trolls.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Apr 2008 @ 4:54am

Hmmmm...Calypso Wireless has a similar patent...I wonder if we will see these two in court.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Susabelle, 22 Apr 2008 @ 6:00am

Like it's not been done before...
Uhm. Maybe I should point out that adaptive technology used by disabled persons already does this...I can name a dozen products off the top of my head that do this, including JAWS, Zoomtext, WYNN, Read and Write Gold, Open Book, Scan and Read....it is a huge list.

Not a new idea at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Apr 2008 @ 6:07am

I remember playing with a text-to-speech card for the TSR-80. That had to be what 20 years ago?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
angry dude, 22 Apr 2008 @ 7:08am

IBM's patents
Greg Aharonyan did a study of IBM's patent portfolio some time ago and concluded that most of IBM's patents are junk despite the fact that IBM's technology is actually pretty good

I agree 100% with his findings (after I did my own study of IBM's patents in some very narrow field)

BTW, IBM's voice engine is one of the best

Heck, I run MisterHouse home automation program and use IBM's voice engine - sounds fantastic, almost like a sci-fi movie

"Welcome home, Sir, I'm Mister House"
"The cold beer is in the fridge, the sauna room is heating up, enjoy your evening, Sir"

Still, IBM is the biggest "patent troll" on Earth and everybody knows it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 22 Apr 2008 @ 6:44pm
  
  Re: IBM's patents
  And I thought "patent troll" defined an entity which collects patents, files law suits and does not produce a product.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
oregonnerd, 22 Apr 2008 @ 9:42am

typing-to-voice
Be a real problem if they couln't spell, eh??
--Glenn
[and if they ...eh...couln't spell or type either one, boy]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
kpo, 4 Apr 2010 @ 7:42pm

re: IBM Seeks Patent On Typing-To-Speech In A Call Center
Pretty interesting patent. I guess, IBM has many patents and such an innovator company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]