Blockbuster Sued For Revealing Movie Rental Info To Facebook's Beacon
from the oops dept
There was plenty of people upset by Facebook's original "Beacon" advertising system, that automatically connected information on purchases to your "news feed" and broadcasted them to all your Facebook friends -- but now we'll find out if some of that activity was illegal. One of the initial participating companies was Blockbuster, who automatically fed information to Facebook about what movies you had rented. It turns out that there's a specific federal law against revealing info about movie rentals (who knew?). The Videotape Privacy Protection Act was apparently passed by Congress after Supreme Court Appointee Robert Bork's videotape rentals were revealed while he was being reviewed by Congress. While plenty of folks don't know about this law, you would think that it would be pretty near the top of the list of laws that a company like Blockbuster would be familiar with. Yet, it seems to not have occurred to anyone there that automatically feeding movie rental info to Facebook might violate that law. However, it appears someone else did recognize this and has now sued Blockbuster for violating the law. Not surprisingly, the plan is to turn this into a class action lawsuit. Thanks to the specifics of this particular law, it's unlikely that other Beacon participants violated this law, but it's only a matter of time until class action lawyers figure out some other law they probably violated.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: advertising, beacon, privacy, video privacy protection act
Companies: blockbuster, facebook
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
They will send out a coupon for 1 free video rental (So long as you provide all your personal information) to those who rented movies during this period and may have had their information revealed.
The attorney's will get paid based on how many coupons got sent out, (not how many were actually used).
The attorney's will make lots of money!!!!
God bless America (Just don't make us sue you for it)!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Throw a brick through BlockBuster's window. You won't get your $2,500. But you'll get $2,500 worth of satisfaction. And it's the only way you'll get anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There oughta be a law!
Gotta love a system that rewards those who "seek" damages rather than those that were actually damaged.
Never forget... More lawyers in the state of NJ than all of Japan and Korea combined!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ignorance is no excuse
If so, BB may have a defense - they were not allowed access to the laws because the laws are under copyright.
http://techdirt.com/articles/20080416/133815864.shtml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TOS
And even if it didn't say that when you signed up for Facebook, one of the provisions probably allows them to change the TOS by sending out an email notification that no one reads.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
federal law: movie rental info private
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: federal law: movie rental info private
No, it was the Robert Bork hearings, not Clarence Thomas.
But it still doesn't explain the special law *just* for video rentals.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wonderful
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]