Russia Wants To Censor The Internet

from the notice-a-pattern? dept

Thu, Apr 24th 2008 9:21am — Mike Masnick

Get the feeling that folks in Russia are a bit jealous of China's Great Firewall? Suddenly, we're seeing lots of proposals that seem to be designed to limit what folks can do online. Just recently we wrote about efforts to require WiFi users to register with the government, and now Russian prosecutors are trying to extend "anti-extremism" laws to the internet. The laws apparently forbid newspapers from publishing "extremist material," at the risk of being shut down completely. Prosecutors are hoping that an internet version of the law would require ISPs to block access to any sites that include "extremist" content. Of course, extremist content is defined rather broadly. It seems pretty clear that this is just an attempt to try to stifle speech the government doesn't like.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: censorship, internet, russia

34 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Ron (profile), 24 Apr 2008 @ 9:26am

Well ...
... it'll happen here soon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 24 Apr 2008 @ 11:31am
  
  Re: Well ...
  No, it won't. Idiot.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- N1ck0, 24 Apr 2008 @ 4:21pm
  
  Re: Well ...
  The US won't need a firewall, we already assume we own the entire internet anyway.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - greg, 25 Apr 2008 @ 1:29pm
    
    Re: Re: Well ...
    HAHA
    We do own the internet.
    We invented it.
    We built it.
    It was decades before anyone else had it.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
coolridge, 24 Apr 2008 @ 9:49am

a bad lesson for the world
This is what happens when the world lets one country get away with it without any repurcussions at all. The corporations and the politicians support China's efforts by their very lack of initiative in doing anything at all or taking a hard stance. Now Russia will do it and sure, maybe there will indeed be more to follow. Frightening.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 24 Apr 2008 @ 10:18am
  
  Re: a bad lesson for the world
  So policing other countries is good?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Apr 2008 @ 9:50am

But how is extremist material really defined. I would like to know, because I would like to use my own opinion on if it is broad or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Alexio, 24 Apr 2008 @ 10:19am
  
  Re:
  In Russia it can be defined as broad as they NEED it to be to prosecute the people they want to go after.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 24 Apr 2008 @ 10:22am
    
    Re: Re:
    And where is the evidence for that? Just asking? And don't quote other techdirt blogs. Find actual sources.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Chronno S. Trigger, 24 Apr 2008 @ 10:52am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      You don't get the point we are trying to get at.
      
      There is no definition of "extremist". They can make it mean whatever they want it to mean. Just because they haven't used it yet doesn't mean they won't or should even have the option.
      
      Now this is Russia not the US so they should be able to govern their country as they see fit.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 24 Apr 2008 @ 11:09am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        You don't get the point. You cannot just make statements without evidence. Well, apparently, if you are Mike then you can.
        
        Once again, point out where it says there is no definition of extemism. Does no one know how to defend their own comments?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        AlexE, 24 Apr 2008 @ 11:40am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I agree with Anonymous Coward. The story about Russia is going to make everyone register every Wi-Fi device is truly bs. You have or rather obtain a license for Wi-Fi hot spot that charges money for access. For all other cases you don't register anything. Mike please get all the facts right. Regarding extremism, Russia has definition for it in law books regarding it and I wouldn't mind if government will shutdown a few websites. In case someone will use the power for different purpose the Streisand effect will kick in. So far fair game to me.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased), 24 Apr 2008 @ 11:52am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        With a little googleing I found
        this from a UN consultant firm regarding the way anti-extremist is defined vaguely.
        
        Another
        
        Here is the main website of the Federal arm responsible for the legislation. I don't speak Russian and I don't see an English option. But if you do I am sure you can find the law and read their definition.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Anonymous Coward, 24 Apr 2008 @ 11:45am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Absolutely! So we should let those in Darfur, Burma, Rwanda, Somalia, Syria, and the rest of those countries do whatever they feel like doing. Who are we to question any of the actions that take place in these countries?
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        AlexE, 24 Apr 2008 @ 11:50am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yes we should. If people of particular country don't like something they make a revolution. We already now consequences of US deciding what is right in Yugoslavia. Force doesn't always solve everything.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 24 Apr 2008 @ 1:13pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Not disagreeing...but it seemed like Clinton went to far more places in the name of peace keeping and meals on wheels than either Bush did...and he was only applauded for it. Bosnia, haiti, etc... I dont think you can have it both ways. Either disband the UN who wants to govern the world or accept a world where the strongest survive.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
babarum, 24 Apr 2008 @ 10:27am

I would just be satisfied if
they monitored and shut down the RBN (Russian Business Network). That alone would stop the tons of spam spewed from that network alone. It would also cut off the water to all the botnets they own and effectively put them out of business.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Apr 2008 @ 11:10am

It's setting a bad example, #8. I for one am proud to be a citizen of what is soon to be oceania. Any folks here from Eurasia, Africa, or Eastasia?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- B H Paperstaxxx, 13 Oct 2008 @ 7:06am
  
  Re:
  We're alies with Eurasia fighting Eastasia right. Wait just yesterday we were allies with Eastasia fighting Eurasia right.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
brguzz, 24 Apr 2008 @ 11:36am

situation in W-Europe
At least in Germany censorship happens since years. At ISP level websites considered as inappropriate have to be blocked. You may find more searching for 'Jürgen Büssow' and 'Sperrungsverfügung'. To see Russia following such a bad example might be considered as understandable. Both in Russia and China blocked content can be easily obtained using proxy servers. Such knowledge is widely dispersed in both countries.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Canada, 24 Apr 2008 @ 12:40pm

Is it any difference between this and the story the other week about the UK Travel Agent advertising "CUBAN" vactions for Europeans that the U.S. Gov had his websites shut down because the sites where registerd by a U.S. web regestry (not hosted in the U.S.)?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike (profile), 24 Apr 2008 @ 5:59pm
  
  Re:
  Is it any difference between this and the story the other week about the UK Travel Agent advertising "CUBAN" vactions for Europeans that the U.S. Gov had his websites shut down because the sites where registerd by a U.S. web regestry (not hosted in the U.S.)?
  
  Not really. And we were equally bothered by that:
  
  http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080305/012547444.shtml
  
  If there is any difference, though, it's that the prohibition there was much more defined. "Extremism" leaves open quite a bit of definition, allowing the gov't to effective censor what they want.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
dorpass, 24 Apr 2008 @ 1:12pm

IP
Mike, why don't you comment the fact that a second annual round table discussion opened in Russia on the Intellectual Property in Russia? That should be more up your alley than yet another "OMG, they are censoring!" story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Apr 2008 @ 1:32pm

Mike just enjoys barking up the wrong tree. Political extremist/vigilante that makes up bogus stories over nothing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
greg, 24 Apr 2008 @ 3:19pm

US built the internet
The US built the internet. And for decades only the government and universities, used the internet. So let the other countries shut down the internet in their countries. Who cares. The internet belongs to the US. And only the US!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pgraves, 25 Apr 2008 @ 2:59am

Not my problem
If a man is beaten up in front of my house then I either try to step in to stop it, or if it looks really dangerous I call the police.

If someone draws a line across my front garden and says "this is another country over here", then they can beat him all they like, its no longer my problem.

If a clique of gangsters successfully takes charge of a country, and then subverts its laws in order to continue to exploit its people and resources indefinitely for their own gain (Of course this could never happen could it), then because its not my country, its not my problem.

Are we not at some level brothers and sisters? What is the bizarre and oh-so-convenient delimitation of a "country" that allows us to wash our hands of all involvement with the affairs of the people next door?

And No I'm not a fan of W.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Awnser, 25 Apr 2008 @ 5:16am

WIKI "Extremism is a term used to describe the actions or ideologies of individuals or groups outside the perceived political center of a society; or otherwise claimed to violate common moral standards."

The point about "extremism" is that the definition in its application in law, can easily be seen by the courts as a matter for the courts. Something can be extreme and harmless or extreme and harmful. The mere use of the word "extremism" is actually laying the framework for clamping down on free speech. i.e. censorship. The term is really inappropriate for the sort of application they seek. Interpretation of the word "extremism" can be so unclear and subjective, that its application in the courts can be used in a draconian way if they so choose with little accountability. Its such a cumbersome term because you basically have to be able to form a judgment of what's normal and what's not normal and what's far from normal for it to be considered to be extreme. I think the term clouds the interpretation of law and fails to provide adequate accountability in its application.

I think the term "extremism" should not be used as its just confusing to society and it plays into he hands of those that have the power to administer the law, rather than those that wish to abide by the law. I think whatever the crime, it must be specifically identified and clear cut. For example you cannot incite by way of verbal or written threat, what might be deemed a criminal act.

As indicated, one can have extreme views on all sorts of issues and be perfectly law abiding in application of those views or alternatively they can allow their views to commit a criminal offence. Conversely, you can be very normal but also commit a criminal act. i.e in the context that many acts of crime are not unusual and in fact are normal and not extreme, even though they may be illegal. In civil law the mere act of driving through a red light is not unusual and thus not extreme, but it is a breach of the civil laws of the land. In some cities stabbings and muggings are not unusual and thus not extreme, yet indeed they are criminal. Not sure how the Russian law works though as in Western law based on the British common law system, in cases of subjectivity, its usually what's considered reasonable by the average person.

Thus I think the term "extremism" is inappropriate in its application with regard to administration of law and just provides the grounds and environment that allow the law to be used for unlawful and uncivil purposes by those that govern the application of law, rather than work in the peoples best interests.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sigve, 25 Apr 2008 @ 8:24am

ITS REAL BAD AND SAD..
We have heard about "russian" we allways have talk about Russian like they have a bad management.. and now they prove it again.. and again.

I know there are many russian ppl who want a website like : www.jyderup.com

We can give them this free.. out of russia.But its not easy,cause the goverment control every thing.. and how can the buisness in russian grow serious if it like that?

Take care and have a nice weekend

Sigve
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Madan, 25 Apr 2008 @ 8:41am

Comment
Its not totally wrong thing. Internet and its user became dangerous for social order.In recent times some websites and blogs are promoting Extremism. Russia also on the gun point .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hope, 25 Apr 2008 @ 2:35pm

People will only be pushed around for so long, push them hard enough and they WILL fight back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Putin - Moscow, 27 Apr 2008 @ 11:43am

Wel..
I live in Russia, but this is the biggest nonsense I have heard for a long time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
used caravans, 8 Feb 2010 @ 3:29pm

Help me for that
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
used caravans, 8 Feb 2010 @ 3:29pm

Help me for that
killroy has been engaged with his adornment n bunk, that untold I experience. he works posts every now and then on psychostick forums. I'll bet petey has finally hopeless it and is out on a lucre fling. he never fought with anybody, called anybody names, or anything. he's gotta be all confined up. I charge things and vocalization every now and then. keeps me from earnings group. although quitting vaporisation has me a lil solon uptight than wonted. ==================
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
used caravans, 8 Feb 2010 @ 3:30pm

Help me for that
killroy has been engaged with his adornment n bunk, that untold I experience. he works posts every now and then on psychostick forums. I'll bet petey has finally hopeless it and is out on a lucre fling. he never fought with anybody, called anybody names, or anything. he's gotta be all confined up. I charge things and vocalization every now and then. keeps me from earnings group. although quitting vaporisation has me a lil solon uptight than wonted. ================== robert used caravans
[ link to this | view in chronology ]