Instant Messaging Eating Into SMS Text Messaging
from the but-of-course... dept
The old "accepted wisdom" was that folks in Europe communicated via SMS text messaging, while folks in the US were mainly doing internet-based instant messaging. There were a variety of reasons for why things developed this way, but it was a generally accurate statement for a while. However, even early on, some of us began wondering what would happen as the two worlds started to merge. That is, as mobile phones became more powerful and acted more like handheld computers, wouldn't users start to realize that instant messaging would save them a lot of money in terms of data costs. Especially with advanced phones like the iPhone, it seemed inevitable that "expensive" SMS would start to run into trouble. And, in fact, that appears to be happening. A new study in the UK (where SMS text messaging is huge) has shown that, as people start using instant messaging applications, their use of SMS text messaging drops significantly. The one exception, by the way, is with older users, who are comfortable enough with SMS and don't seem as interested in using IM on their phones. Either way, this has to be a concern for mobile operators who have a tendency to assume that high-priced services will always remain high-priced and in high demand.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: instant messaging, sms messaging, text messaging
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cell vs internet
America:
Cheapest cell phone plan (not prepaid): I've found a 500 minute Verizon family plan. 2 phones, unlimited texting, unlimited Verizon calls, unlimited nights and weekends: I pay $130 a month.
Cheapest internet plan: Currently we have 2 broadband options here, Time Warner Roadrunner and Verizon DSL. RR is $60 a month (which I have,) VDSL $40. I can find multiple sources for $10/$15 a month unlimited dialup.
Germany:
Cheapest cell: My cousin pays 15 Euro (roughly $30) for a single cell phone, no texting but if he added it it'd be about another $5 a month. Even 2 phones means $70, and that's not a "deal" by any means
Cheapest internet: My cousin HAS to pay for dialup as there are no other offerings. ~$55 a month, THEN he has to pay by Kb used (not sure of the rate, but everyone over there is scared to use it due to cost)
So in conclusion:
America: Internet cheap, Cell phones expensive
Germany: Cell phones cheap, Internet expensive
It only seems logical it evolved like that...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Instant Messaging Eating Into SMS Text Messaging
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SMS
HOWEVER, it is almost nothing -- which gives you an idea of what sort of margin they make on any fees they charge.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
txtmsg/IM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: txtmsg/IM
BTW: for you *nix users, check out Ethereal. It's the tool I use to see AIM messages (handy if you have someone backpacking on your network and they happen to be...dumb)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: txtmsg/IM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: txtmsg/IM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: txtmsg/IM
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: txtmsg/IM
I wonder how long it'll take him to figure out how to commit a man-in-the-middle attack on you? After all, how do you know who you're exchanging keys with ... ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: txtmsg/IM
http://www.thespec.com/news/article/344046
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ethereal? Wireshark!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Texting isn't expensive - and it's growing not shrinking
The figures in the report cited are about all messaging - from computers as well as phones. It's not clear what might be driving the changing proportionate shares of messaging types, but it certainly isn't the collapse of SMS.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
IM vs Text
regards
kerry
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SMS is "store and forward" not "instant"
Beck
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Keeping records
[ link to this | view in chronology ]