More Details On Patenting A Mutual Fund

from the hopefully-this-goes-nowhere dept

Last month, we wrote about a troublesome attempt to patent the method of creating a mutual fund. Now it appears that more details are coming out, and it remains rather ridiculous. The guy uses a method based on judging a company's sales, cash flow, book value, and dividends -- which is basically the four key things that pretty much any stock picker is going to look at. Basically, this guy has come up with a method to pick stocks that has been working okay for him (though, there are some questions as to how well it really works), and now he wants to prevent anyone else from being able to pick stocks in the same way. Luckily, his first attempt at a patent was rejected, but that hasn't stopped him from pushing forward with a second attempt to get the patent.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: mutual fund, patents


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    yo ho ho...., 3 Jun 2008 @ 3:51pm

    Hey.. now here's a novel idea...

    I am trying to patent the concept of going to a building filled with perishable and non-perishable food items where other people can come into my establishment and purchase these items from me at a slightly higher price than my cost to acquire these goods.

    I can use bigger words to minimize the obviousness ...

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Litle Punk, 3 Jun 2008 @ 5:03pm

    I have a patent pending on all methods of saving money.
    The process involves spending less than you earn.
    I will soon be asking everyone who saves money to license my method.

    I am just a little guy trying to make a profit from my invention, but I'm sure that the big evil corporations will steal my idea and not pay me what is rightfully mine.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Jun 2008 @ 7:35pm

    No money in that idea since nobody spends less than they earn these days!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    MLS, 3 Jun 2008 @ 7:45pm

    Patenting Process

    I am disappointed that a bunch of people cry "It's obvious" without having even seen what the application discloses and the claims it contains.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Chiropetra, 3 Jun 2008 @ 10:36pm

      Re: Patenting Process

      Does the phrase "trout in the milk" do anything for you?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 4 Jun 2008 @ 5:04pm

        Re: Re: Patenting Process

        "trout in the milk"

        that's a good one, never had heard of it before

        thx

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      dorpass, 4 Jun 2008 @ 1:35am

      Re: Patenting Process

      I am disappointed that stupid thoughts like that still pop up.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      John Wilson, 4 Jun 2008 @ 7:35am

      Re: Patenting Process

      I'm dismayed with some who seem to think that patents ought to be granted based on prior art, public domain and obviousness no matter how they're dressed up.

      Being in a brand new suit with nice marketing buzz words makes no difference at all. Nor does it matter if the patent applicant is Microsoft or some broker trying to patent a method of making a mutual fund based on things people in his business have been doing for decades.

      I understand that in the law the placement of a comma or semi colon can make all the difference. In the real world it doesn't.

      Even in the law common sense is supposed to play a role. Unless it's someone who makes his living off some of this silliness.

      ttfn

      John

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        MLS, 4 Jun 2008 @ 10:19am

        Re: Re: Patenting Process

        I suggest you read up on just how a patent application is prepared and prosecuted before making rants that totally undermine what you have to say.

        link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.