It's Baaaaaack. Canadian DMCA On The Way
from the if-you-wait-long-enough,-maybe-people-will-forget dept
You may recall that last fall, Michael Geist notified the world that the Canadian government was about to announce a Canadian version of the DMCA, that was effectively a Hollywood wishlist of unnecessary copyright controls. The politician in charge of pushing this through, Jim Prentice, thought that he could get it approved quietly with no one noticing -- figuring that copyright is a boring subject that no one cares about. He was wrong. Thanks to Geist shining some sunlight on the bill, tens of thousands of individuals suddenly became quite vocal in opposition to the bill -- and even a bunch of big Canadian companies came out against the bill. Prentice delayed the bill, insisting that he would listen to consumer and business concerns... though there were never any open hearings or public discussions.Instead, it looks like Prentice made a very minor change in the bill (allowing "time shifting") and then has waited for a convenient time to re-release the bill. It's expected that the bill will once again be introduced this coming Wednesday (just before Prentice is set to leave town). Once again, Michael Geist has all the details including what the likely talking points are in support of the bill... and why they're totally bogus. It sounds like Prentice is going to stick to the entirely false claim that Canada needs to approve this bill to meet its "international obligations" as found in various treaties it's signed. This is a common trick used by the entertainment industry and politicians to justify bad legislation. But, as Geist notes, Canada already is in compliance with the treaty in question. It's too bad Canada didn't follow the lead of other countries in standing up for the rights of its consumers.
In the meantime, as Geist notes, Prentice seems to think that this particular bill will sneak through again without much opposition. It's surprising that he thinks that, given what happened last time. But, if he's going to think people forget things that quickly, perhaps its time for Canadian citizens to make it clear that they don't forget, and they don't appreciate Prentice selling out their basic rights to folks in Hollywood who are too lazy to update their obsolete business models.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: canada, copyright, dmca, jim prentice, michael geist
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Oh well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
open hearings or public discussions.
I've been to these where public opinion was vocal and decidedly against, and the powers that be essentially said; don't confuse us with the facts, our minds are made up.
Later when anyone brought up the subject they would always say; we held meetings on that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: open hearings or public discussions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: open hearings or public discussions.
The voters COULD change things. They just don't want to. Call it apathy, call it laziness, but the truth is, the public at large just can't be riled up enough to actually change anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: open hearings
That's what we used to call these "open hearings" when I was a newspaper reporter. Named after the tiny fish that periodically descend on California's beaches, throw themselves out of the water to spawn and die.
At least the grunnions got to continue the species. All the commenters get out of these public comment hearings is a chance to let off steam.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Address for your MP
http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Parlinfo/Compilations/HouseOfCommons/MemberByPostalCode.aspx?Menu=HOC
Enter your postal code and all contact methods come up. Let them know what you think
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I did ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
can cmda
area163 on youtube for a couple vids (under 1 min)
net neutralizing freedom (of info)
privacy
copyright
web 3.0 is owned by providers.
thru filtering (sites)
throttling (your bis so THEY can pick it up)
and ad-inserts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re #4 MikeR
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Remember....there's an election coming
For our American friends, we all need to remember that the Tories are a minority government and they do not control when the committee will sit that will look this bill over and what the schedule may be. Prentice may want it in the dog days of summer though my bet is that the Opposition will schedule it for just after Labour Day so that it gets maximum coverage before the House is called back for the fall sitting.
While anything is possible given our Prime Minister, I can hardly think that they'll cast this bill as a matter of confidence in an effort to ram it through the Commons. I can't honestly see him campaigning on anything even remotely this bad.
(Again for our American friends, if the Government loses a vote on a bill that they say is a matter of confidence there's close to a 100% chance we'll all be traipsing to the polls in late fall or early winter. Canadians have a habit of punishing Governments that pull that timing off by "tossing out the bums".)
If it makes it past the Commons there's the Senate to consider who have been showing the odd flash of activity and sense recently. Surprising as that is!
So it ain't over till the fat lady sings. More to the point it ain't over till the G-G signs the bill to bring it into force and until the Courts have their look at it.
I can guarantee that one thing that will lead to serious opposition to this bill is the charge that as far as the MPAA/RIAA and Bush Administration are showing Canada is merely an extension, less than a colony even, of the United States. Seriously the wrong way to get any legislation passed.
ttfn
John
[ link to this | view in chronology ]