Privacy Groups Miss The Point: It's Not Where Google's Privacy Policy Is, It's What It Does
from the focusing-on-the-wrong-thing dept
Last week, we wrote about the ridiculous concerns being raised by a few privacy advocates that (gasp!) Google doesn't include a link to its privacy policy on the front page. This seemed like a really pointless concern since almost no one reads these privacy policies anyway, and those who do often misunderstand the policy anyway. Besides, there are plenty of companies out there that don't even abide by their own privacy policies. In other words, the real issue isn't where the privacy policy is, but whether or not the company actually keeps its promises and treats its users' data properly.And yet... a bunch of consumer and privacy groups, including ones I respect like the EFF and the ACLU are now trying to turn this into a big deal by publicly demanding that Google add a link to its privacy policy on its home page. This isn't about privacy. This is "privacy theater." It's about putting on a good show that has nothing to do with whether or not Google is doing right by its users. If there's a link to Google's privacy policy on its front page or not, it won't change what Google does with users' info, and it almost certainly won't change the way anyone (other than maybe these groups) view Google. It's all a big show for no reason. There are plenty of important causes that these groups should be working on. Worrying whether or not Google links to its privacy policy from its front page or one page deep is silly pandering.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: aclu, eff, hype, privacy, privacy policies, privacy theater
Companies: aclu, eff, google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Silly Pandering indeed!
Personally, I don't care about Google's Privacy Policy. Why? They've given so much to us (myself being a user) and NOT spammed their users with third party stuff. There's no reason not to expect them to hold fast to their high level of trust between them and their user base.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Much ado
(Advertising Programs - Business Solutions - About Google)
won't clutter the page nor detract from the user experience.
It is silly for these groups to take a shot a Google for not displaying some meaningless eye-candy and it is just plain stupid for Google to dig its heels in on such a minor tweak to the home page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Much ado
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Much ado
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Hmm...if I'm at www.google.com and I want to see their privacy policy, what might be a good way to SEARCH for it? Oh, I know. How about googling the words "google privacy policy"? I don't know what's so hard about that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's a privacy policy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shift of focus?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Much ado about nothing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I recall
I trust Google more than the ACLU.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As if it really mattered..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing better to do?
Although Google could easily shut them up by putting a link on the home page (and their reasoning for not doing so is pretty silly; it wouldn't add *that* much clutter to their page, not any more than is already there), there is absolutely nothing wrong with where the link is now.
Can Google sue for defamation for these groups trying to make a public spectacle out of this non-issue? If they think a law has been violated, let them take Google to court, where they can attempt to explain to a judge how clicking "About Google" and "Privacy Policy" is too hard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bored and have nothing to do....
and if someone wants to read the damn policy... just google it and it pops up in front of you......
by the way, i use iGoogle and it's right there at the bottom of the page saying.... "privacy policy".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its there
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Its there
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google "Google Privacy Policy"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He who will fool me at play, will fool me any way...
The issue is being blown up by google not anyone else, put the link out there and don't get lippy about "creativity" or "clean" home pages. As if; Advertising Programs, Business Solutions, or that filthy copyright symbol doesn't already soil the precious home page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wise up folks.
Butte Muncher
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
iGoogle
I mean, I understand that it's not on the classic home page, but really, is it that hard to find? Let's find out. Hmm, let's see... Oh! 'About Google'... *click*... THAR IT IS! Google isn't trying to hide anything. I guess we just have some lazy people is all...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
mission creep
googles home page works because there is so little on it
ffs leave it alone
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Liar or Moron?
'Ms Givens, of Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, said: "I went through the exercise of finding [Google's] privacy policy and it's not easy. It's not intuitive and it's not a couple of clicks. You have to work at it.'
And yet, I was able to get to it in three clicks. (About Google -> Privacy Policy -> Google Privacy Policy).
It's one thing to say you don't agree with the way a company does something, but why does this woman feel the need to lie about it to make her point?
Pathetic!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
little details
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I agree...but...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fortune and glory
All of the "privacy companies" will gain "glory" (actually "notoriety") and bragging rights because they were the ones who "forced big bad Google to do what we want".
It's very telling that they go after a fairly small issue (where to place a link on a site) rather than the larger issue of auditing sites to make sure they follow their own privacy policy. But, which issue is easier to handle and which will bring them "we beat Google" bragging rights faster?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually, I do care
[ link to this | view in chronology ]