Forget DRM, Microsoft Looks To Build Digital Manners Management
from the mind-your-manners dept
If there's one thing companies should understand by now, it's the idea that restricting people from doing stuff that they want to do tends to backfire, badly. Just look at every attempt to create "DRM." Well, apparently Microsoft is trying to create a different sort of digital restrictions policy: one based on hard-coded "manners." A few folks sent in notice that Microsoft has applied for a patent on a system for "device manner policy" (DMP). Basically, such a DMP system would restrict the use of certain features in certain locations. So, for example, a mobile phone that has the DMP technology might not be able to ring in a movie theater, but would instead shift to vibrate. Or a digital camera or cameraphone would automatically disable the ability to take photos in a museum. Really, this is just another form of DRM, restricting what people can do with the technology they own. While it's nice to think that technology could somehow block out rude uses of devices, the opportunity for problems and abuse seems quite high. Wouldn't we be better off focusing on social norms to get people to learn when it is and is not appropriate to use certain technologies?Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: digital manner policy, manners, patents
Companies: microsoft
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Again, everything should be the consumer's choice. So as long as we can decide when or where our devices would do certain things, we should be fine.
Jemar
-SwaggerDap.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Call me a cynic, but I've long since given up on hoping that people will do the right thing on their own.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You missed the problem
Step one: Said thing is optional, but we built it in - turn it on or off
after said product is well established, step 2: Said thing is now included automatically "for your benefit". Can't turn it off now. Whoops!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You missed the problem
Step one, said thing is 'optional,' turn it on or 'off,' but if we really want to (or even on a whim) we can over-ride your preference without notifying you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
`So as long as we can decide when or where our devices would do certain things, we should be fine.'
That is what you already have.
Now, a *hinting* system, that would be nice. If the moobile companies were to get together and spec-out an open shared protocol whereby a phone could detect how inappropriate it would be to ring in a given place, that would be interesting. It certainly does not fall to m$loth to impose this on the world - it can only become nonstandard that way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Choice
Sure, it's all about choice. Whether I choose to punch your lights out next time you're yapping in the cinema... or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Choice
Keep up the good work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It would be nice but...
Sure, but some people are unteachable. Consider the texting-teen while driving. Or the oh-so important noisy guy at the movies. Or any other social slob who doesn't care about their neighbors only themselves.
Society has rules because many in society need directions controls on their behavior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It would be nice but...
This is a flawed technical "answer" to a social problem.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Get Real
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hopefully there is already a patent...
MS did this already with hollywood (HDCP, playsforsure, etc.) and this looks like some sort of deal with a government (probably china or england, possibly the US). we won't know until the first country comes forward requiring all mobile phones support the "feature".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hopefully there is already a patent...
Unfortunately, the patent does exist but MS owns it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
focusing on social norms
Good luck with that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dressing Rooms/ Gyms / ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But if we must talk about it being used in cell phones, then allow me to contribute this. With all the ISPs who also provide cell phone services (most trying to sell 3G "high bandwidth" phones now) and those very same ISPs running out of bandwidth in their poorly designed infrastructure for the tubes, is it not possible that they are also refusing to upgrade their wireless services? If you ask me, a phone manufacturer will pay to use DMP, start making only phones with DMP, and then AT&T along with Verizon will be the first two companies to only sell DMP phones. With DMP, they can shut your ass off when you start using 3G to browse youtube too much and it causes the age and poor design of their 3G delivery system to show. Bandwidth is still not unlimited just because you throw it through the air.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why all the hand-waving?
It would be... difficult... to enforce this on all phones, especially with the rise of 3rd-party software we're seeing recently. I think if anyone at Microsoft really has that goal they're deluding themselves.
But to have a way to say "hey, we'd appreciate it if you turned off your ringer here" seems like a good thing - I, for one, would prefer not to have to remember to turn off my phone when I'm at a movie.
Techdirt's usually good about noting that technological means don't alter the ends - i.e., phishing is fraud, not some "new" crime; "cyberwar" is a meaningless term; etc.
I don't see the difference between this and a sign, really. There are rules, they're posted, you can choose whether to follow them. What's the problem?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why all the hand-waving?
A sign requires human action to comply, so there is a choice. When you start planting automated hooks into the device, you are taken out of the loop; the choice is made for you. That's the problem.
Yeah, it would be hard to get it on all phones, and yeah 3rd party software might have something to say about it, and yeah it's pretty dumb on MS's part. But it's also a bit of a frightening concept.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No One Will Buy In
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No One Will Buy In
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would like this too, but not from Microsoft...
But it has to be my choice, and I simply do not trust Microsoft to leave it at that. I do not want my phone or camera automatically disabled by the police when they turn up to a peaceful protest with tear-gas and batons, for example.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yes - Miss Manners will control your life
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Set the Limits *Very Carefully*
Changes are fine, providing that the user is notified of them, but disabling should not be used unless it is a health and safety issue. e.g. on an aeroplane
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
what you have to remember
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]