Court Rules That Selling Promo CDs Is Perfectly Legal
from the huge-win dept
There was a big win for copyright and the concept of the first sale doctrine today, as a court has ruled that record labels cannot stop the sale of a promo CD just because it's stamped with a message that says "not for resale." We had discussed this case last summer, when it was first filed. Universal Music was trying to prevent a guy selling promo CDs on eBay. He had bought them at various music stores. Universal claimed that because the CDs were stamped with that "not for resale" message, they really retained ownership of those CDs and no one could sell them. This would go against the very concept of the first sale doctrine, and, thankfully the court agreed, trashing Universal's weak claim that just by writing a note on any piece of content, it could ignore copyright law and retain ownership of the good forever.This is a big victory, as a loss would mean that content providers could basically create their own copyright rules for any content they sold, potentially limiting it in much greater ways than copyright already does. This ruling, coming right after the Supreme Court's ruling in the Quanta case, about a similar issue involving patents, hopefully will block companies from trying to pretend they get to retain total control over goods even after they're sold.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, first sale, promo cds, used cds
Companies: universal music
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Licensee Transfer??
For instance, if X company buys software and in the license agreement or EULA it says that the license can't be transfered does it hold up?
I've seen instances where a company buys software in their name, doesn't need it any longer, resells it to another company. At this point, the software company refuses to recognize the 2nd company involved and considers that they are using pirated software...
Freedom
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Licensee Transfer??
The concept of software being licensed rather than sold is a completely different subject.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Licensee Transfer??
The issue with CDs is that physical media was treated as property. This gives the owner/consumer more rights: first-sale, modify the media, etc. Because once you own it you pretty much can do what you please with it (except for violate other laws by redistributing, violating copyright, trademark, etc). You could basically buy CDs and use them resell them as wall art if you wish.
But recently the media companies want to say 'no we didn't want to sell you that cd; we really just licensed it to you. Its really still our property'. In that case you loose those consumer rights because its not actually yours. But if you license are getting a license to listen to the song, your supposed to be able to exercise that license no matter what the format the media is in.
So whenever people try to claim rights as an owner they claim to be licensing it. Whenever people try to claim licensee rights they claim to have sold property. They basically want to retain rights from both without the negative.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They'll still try to pretend...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
coool!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
driving people away
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: driving people away
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
WTF?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Great!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Licensee Transfer - Thanks!
Freedom
[ link to this | view in thread ]
retail maintenance agreements
On June 28, 2007, the Supreme Court overruled Dr. Miles which was decided in 1911.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
what about mixtapes? Any Anwsers?
That I can sell mixtapes?
[ link to this | view in thread ]