How The GPL Defangs Patent Trolls
from the mutual-defense dept
Last week, Red Hat settled an abusive patent lawsuit brought by a company called FireStar software. Way back in 2006, I discussed the patent in question, which covers some rather broad and obvious software concepts. It looks like Red Hat has settled the lawsuit in a way that extends patent protection to the entire free software community.
Why would a patent troll agree to this? Don Marti explains how the GPL strengthened Red Hat's bargaining position. In a normal patent licensing negotiation, the patent troll would demand a per-user license fee that would be passed along to the vendor's customers. But the GPL specifically prohibits Red Hat from doing this; if Red Hat agreed to pay per-user royalties, it would be in violation of the GPL and would lose the right to distribute the software at all. That put Red Hat in a strong negotiating position because Firestar knew Red Hat wasn't bluffing. In Don Marti's apt metaphor, a patent troll suing a free software company is like "robbing a store where the safe is on a time lock" -- the victim couldn't give him the goods if he wanted to. As a result, FireStar's only option was to grant Red Hat a patent license that covered not only Red Hat but everyone in the free software community whose products are derived from Red Hat's. Obviously, that greatly reduces FireStar's potential patent trolling profits, because it can't shake down all of Red Hat's competitors. This gives patent trolls a powerful incentive to focus on shaking down proprietary software companies, and leave free software vendors alone.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: gpl, patent trolls, patents
Companies: redhat
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
GPL is the most brilliant hack ever!
Time and time again, the GPL demonstrate its brilliance as well its economic benefits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hrmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patent trolls could be our best defense?
Scenario #2; patent troll grants a free licence to all software under an ISO-recognised licence, then proceeds to attack only non-free software vendors such as Microsoft or Adobe. That's where the real money is anyhow. They've practically joined the Open Patent Alliance as far as OSS is concerned. They're no threat to us, we're no threat to them. Everyone is happy except Microsoft and Adobe. Win, win, win!
Sounds like a good plan to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Patent trolls could be our best defense?
Good fantasies you've got there, but they're not applicable to this situation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Patent trolls could be our best defense?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Patent trolls could be our best defense?
After the OOXML debacle you actually trust ISO to administer anything as complex as licensing? ;-)
Thank God, ISO has nothing whatever to do with FLOSS licenses. They're administered by FSF and OSI and for scenario #2 to work I'd nominate OSI, who probably don't want a thing to do with it.
Anyway, the patent troll settled for very little, is basically barred from going after the Linux/BSD communities for which we should all be thankful.
Hopefully, lesson learned.
Now, if just SCO could, FINALLY, learn the same lesson. (Fat chance, I know!)
ttfn
John
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Summary
2) troll realizes they do not have a leg to stand upon
3) troll settles for small handout
4) everyone laughs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ha ha ha ha ha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Idiot punk
BTW, what RMS proposed for GPL version 3 is totally insane
No wonder Linus doesn't want to have anything in common with those software punks from FSF
Linus is a practical guy after all
He understands that "creators matter"
And Red Hat is just riding its fortune on the backs of zillions of unpaid software coolies around the world
(and a strong helping hand from IBM)
Have a good sleep lemmings
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Idiot punk
Or even better, why does you post have nothing to do with anything other than a good read as to what symptoms a paranoid schizophrenic might exhibit? Damn lying squirrels!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Idiot punk
That was FUNNY !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]