Italy Makes 'Deliberately Getting On TV' A Crime?
from the please-explain-the-reasoning dept
With all the new laws being proposed to try to deal with people committing stupid crimes with the sole intention of getting "famous" on YouTube, it seems fair to ask if the laws themselves make sense. However, some seem to be taking such laws even further. Reader Dave writes in to point out that Italy appears to have outlawed deliberately getting yourself on TV. The law was targeted at a prankster who's made quite a career for himself disrupting TV newscasts in order to promote condoms. He's (amazingly) been able to do this 20,000 times. You can understand why this might be frustrating -- but you would also think there would be other laws to deal with this. Instead, this new law sounds very broadly written, as you could get arrested for it even if you appear on TV and are "silent and immobile." So, simply standing behind a TV reporter during a newscast could now put you in prison in Italy. Something doesn't seem right about that.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It's not a law..
(a dozen of people don't need to move to block a train or to interrupt any other public service)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not a law..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not a law..
As for newscasts are a public service?
riiiight, any "news" that relies on advertising is suspect by principal alone, let alone the rest of it.
Think of it this way, today's news is "dumbed down" to the point it will attract viewers stupid enough to actually buy the products advertised. Neat huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's not a law..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's not a law..
riiiight, any "news" that relies on advertising is suspect by principal alone, let alone the rest of it.
Think of it this way, today's news is "dumbed down" to the point it will attract viewers stupid enough to actually buy the products advertised. Neat huh?"
.. You realize the irony of saying something like that on a news website supported by advertising...right? Pardon me, I see a Google Ad I need to go click...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ahh the irony
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
there's worst
In the last few weeks and in the next few ones, press will be denied the right to inform people (about accadiments in court of law), judges will be denied the right to investigate (by the abolition of wiretapping for so called "light" crimes like political bribery), citizens will be denied the right to sue big companies with class actions and army will be called to patrol the streets.
Please, help us!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Brilliant
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gov't sucks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Disturbing...
Something about that doesn't scream "reliable" to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Disturbing...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
BabaBooey BabaBooey BabaBooey BabaBooey BabaBooey
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
20,000 times?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
one more thing ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Gabriele Paolini is crap anyway... ;)
That said: Gabriele Paolini is an idiot; not sure whether he is someone with any mental health issues or if he does all this intentionally. He once appeared during a BBC correspondence from Italy advertising the url for his own porn site. He was even sentenced for that site depicting him and other people in sexual acts. Also, while many times he has appeared promoting condoms, some other times he was saying "Viva il Papa" ("hurrah for the Pope", when John Paul II was Pope) and I saw him one time screaming some assorted nonsense at a few politicians, like "Berlusconi assassino, Pannella pedofilo!" (now I certainly am not a fan of Berlusconi, but I have no idea while he was calling him "assassin" or why did he think that old radical party leader Pannella was in his opinion a "pedophile")...
Sorry for the long text; I was just meaning to say: Paolini is certainly not reliable as a condom or anti-AIDS campaigner/supporter...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does this include politicians campaigning? If so - I'd be all for it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Existing laws should be good enough...
It ought to have civil penalties, not criminal ones, unless the actual acts were de facto disturbing the peace, in which case again, the existing law should be good enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]