MySpace Wins Another Lawsuit Against Another Famous Spam King
from the richter-goes-down-again dept
Just a month after MySpace won a huge fine against famed spam king Sanford "Spamford" Wallace, it's now won its lawsuit against another big name spam king: Scott Richter, who it sued a year and a half ago. Richter and his father (who runs the company) are claiming victory in that the fine is only $6 million -- when MySpace had been asking for much more. You may notice that I'm not linking to coverage of this story, since right now it appears that only the Associated Press is writing about it -- and, as you may have heard, the AP has decided it doesn't want bloggers linking to its stories. Fair enough. Update: Here's the News.com coverage.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: scott richter, spam
Companies: myspace
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: AP Business Model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: AP Business Model
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Amazing! You can't even put a price on that!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Money
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How is the common man to afford 'justice'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
spammers
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great Job!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The AP...
It's good that spammers are getting their just desserts in court, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is meaningless
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I agree
And is a $6 million judgment really effective against spammers? I would bet that they could just save their money for a few months, pay the judgment, and write it off as a cost of spamming users on MySpace.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I agree
No, they won't appeal this decision. First, every day that the spammer delays payment is another day that interest accrues on the award, making it more expensive to pay the $6M. Second, this was a binding arbitration decision under the Federal Arbitration Act, which allows for expedited review. The FAA only allows for vacatur of an award in extremely limited circumstances, such as the arbitrator was fraudulent or exceeded his powers. Thus, if MySpace moves to confirm the award in federal court, they can get judgment rendered pretty swiftly.
Further, if the spammer refuses to pay, MySpace can order seizure of the spammer's assets, and if that doesn't work, MySpace can take a loss on its tax return, thereby alerting the IRS that the spammer may be committing tax evasion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poster #13
If Richter appealed, he would probably be order to pay more. He got lucky with arbitration.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Boycott
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"spam king" lawsuit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"spam king" lawsuit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]