Patent Hoarder Caught Shuffling Patents Around Has To Pay $4 Million

from the hoarding-doesn't-always-pay dept

Mon, Jun 23rd 2008 4:54am — Mike Masnick

You may recall earlier this month that we wrote about Erich Spangenberg, who had set up a series of shell corporations for patent hoarding (and suing). Unfortunately, it appears he got greedy after a big win against DaimlerChrysler. As part of that settlement, he agreed not to sue the automaker again over the same issues -- but by using the various shell corporations, he had a different shell sue Daimler. Daimler saw this as a violation of the settlement and sued back. Now comes the news that Spangenberg has lost and has to pay nearly $4 million in legal fees to Daimler. It's good to see courts finally pushing back on some of the overreaching by patent holders.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: erich spangenberg, patents, shell companies
Companies: daimlerchrysler, plutus ip

8 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Serves em right, 23 Jun 2008 @ 5:06am

Will this discourage the practise ?
2.3 - 4 = -1.7

Ha Ha
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Jun 2008 @ 5:30am

Yessssss!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ehrichweiss, 23 Jun 2008 @ 6:15am

Somehow I bet that we're still going to hear from angry chick, err, dude about how the American people are ruining the great patent system that almost awarded him his almost patent(s).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Willton, 23 Jun 2008 @ 6:31am

Wrong issue
This is not about overreaching patent holders; this is about a litigant breaching the terms of his settlement. He deserves to get punished as such.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 24 Jun 2008 @ 5:31am
  
  Re: Wrong issue
  Willton -> This is not about overreaching patent holders; this is about a litigant breaching the terms of his settlement. He deserves to get punished as such.
  
  Yes, but this is above and beyond, over the top, and hey - wait a minute - it was committed by an over reaching patent hoarder.
  
  Its not just a violation of the terms, it is continuing to do what they were suppose to stop doing. Contempt ?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
eleete, 23 Jun 2008 @ 6:59am

The Patent
Is the patent still intact though ? He can simply sue Ford or Chevy to get the $$
Yep It's still a broken system then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
bored, 23 Jun 2008 @ 7:06am

About damn time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Jun 2008 @ 11:13am

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

HA!!!!!!!!!

oh, Did I say "HA HA HA HA H AH AHA HA AHA HAH AHHA"!!!!!!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]