FCC's Adelstein Drags Out XM-Sirius Review Even More

from the unbridled-discretion dept

Wed, Jul 23rd 2008 1:47pm — Timothy Lee

As we predicted last month, the FCC's approval process for the XM-Sirius merger continues to drag on. This is becoming absurd. The merger was announced almost 18 months ago, which should have been more than enough time for the FCC to reach a decision, or at least come up with its merger conditions for the companies to consider. Yet it was only last month that Chairman Martin came up with his initial proposed conditions, and now Commissioner Adelstein is proposing even more restrictions as a condition of approving the deal. As I've pointed out before, the way antitrust law is enforced is problematic because of the unbridled decision it gives to government bureaucrats.

Adelstein's laundry list of merger conditions appears to have no particular connection to preventing the abuse of monopoly power, the supposed purpose of antitrust law. For example, he would require a 6-year freeze on price increases. If he believes the merged company would have too much market power, then he should vote to deny the merger. If, on the other hand, the merged company would not have too much market power, then a price freeze isn't necessary because competition will be sufficient to keep prices down. But the idea that they have too much monopoly power today, but won't in 6 years, doesn't make a lot of sense. His other major requirement, more minority-owned and non-profit channels, has even less connection to limiting the firm's market power. More minority-owned radio stations may or may not be good policy, but it has nothing to do with antitrust law, and it seems problematic for the FCC to impose those sorts of requirements as part of the merger review process.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: antitrust, fcc, merger
Companies: sirius, xm

12 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Chronno S. Trigger, 23 Jul 2008 @ 1:59pm

long, drawn out crap
It sounds to me like they are just trying to draw the merger out in the hopes that XM and Sirius will run out of money and go belly up. That way they can't compete with terrestrial radio at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sumbuddy Stoopid, 23 Jul 2008 @ 2:41pm

Uh Huh...
Yeah, how long did the Exxon, Mobile thing take? Or how long did it take for AT&T to buy up the Bells again? AT&T and Cingular (2.0)? But to radio companies???? Give me a break...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Woadan, 24 Jul 2008 @ 7:54am
  
  Re: Uh Huh...
  AT&T did NOT buy up the Bells. One of the Bells bought AT&T.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2008 @ 3:17pm

They are trying to just stall and until XM and Sirius go into bankruptcy. They are both losing money, it's obvious there's plenty of competition to sat radio, etc. They sure didn't have any problem approving Exxon Mobile merging who are now raking in billions of dollars of profits and breaking their own profit records every quarter. Which of course lines the politicians pockets so it's no wonder they approved it quickly. They won't get anything financially from the sat merge and the NAB already lines their pockets enough to make them listen to their crap about sat radio.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2008 @ 3:18pm

"Yet dozens of lawmakers have expressed concern about the merger and several state attorneys general have asked the FCC to block the deal, saying the combined company would hurt consumers who could face higher prices and fewer choices with the monopoly satellite radio provider. "

Oh lets see who those lawmakers get money from... could it be... the NAB? Of course it is...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Freedom, 23 Jul 2008 @ 4:53pm

Price Increase - Yeah Right...
I don't think they need to worry about pricing. It is already fairly high and I think most folks are on the brink of saying no at the current prices. One increase would probably push a lot of folks to cancel.

Frankly there are plenty of alternatives and I've yet to see any content that makes sat. radio worthy of its cost.

They don't even have interesting talk shows or other material that would make it interesting.

I'd love to have access to all the local talk show talent across the country or some other aspect that would really make the service, but nope, instead I get some national shows that aren't all that interesting.

In short, if it wasn't for our plane and wanting to get XM on it when flying, we'd probably dump it (I know cry me a river). But in the end, it is priced fairly high for what it is.

Freedom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2008 @ 6:35pm
  
  Re: Price Increase - Yeah Right...
  I spend a huge amount of time driving. Its well worth the money I pay not to have to find a new station every half an hour. Not to mention I always know what stations to go to to hear what I want.
  Not to mention not having my music mangled by censorship, because people have become so lazy and stupid that they would rather have the government baby sit there kids for them then to put a little effort into monitoring them.
  I would gladly pay a little more to keep that.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
anti-comunism, 23 Jul 2008 @ 5:16pm

If price is to high, if the schedule does not satisfy you, there is always free radio, mp3 players, internet radios, cds,etc.
Just come on, decide this crap fast, denied or approve. Move along, what a waste of money from tax payers.
This sound like comunism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 23 Jul 2008 @ 6:31pm

I wonder how much money, And what he is being promised to take this simple thing and draw it out.
Just shows how crooked the whole system is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cynic, 23 Jul 2008 @ 6:49pm

Unelected incompetent (and perhaps corrupt) bureaucrats. I have felt for decades now that the FCC is very nearly worthless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jason Hartzog, 23 Jul 2008 @ 7:09pm

XM-SIRIUS
Exxon-Mobil merger doesn't fall under FCC merger(Don't get me wrong I agree it was lightning fast.) AT%T merger does. Kevin Martin, in my opinion, should have corruption charges brought against him for what he has done. This guy reminds me of J. Edgar Hoover (unless you're a Telco.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lucretious, 24 Jul 2008 @ 4:21am

I won't be a happy camper if I can't listen to Ron & Fez.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]